[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [IFWP] At large membership
At 01:57 AM 10/20/99 , J. Baptista wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, William X. Walsh wrote:
> > On 20-Oct-99 Joop Teernstra wrote:
> > > Failure or capture of the AL membership makes it even more
> > > important for
> > > Individual Domain Name Owners to press for their admission into
> > > the DNSO.
> > Too bad there is no viable organization that can push for this
> > admission.
>agreed. The idno need time to grow, an increased membership, something
Every other constituency was recognized,
warts and all, with the "understanding ;-)"
that they would grow into a more robust
and legitimate organization over time.
Why the double standard for the IDNO?
New Media Relations
"We are creating the most significant new jurisdiction
we've known since the Louisiana purchase, yet we are
building it just outside the constitution's review."
-- Larry Lessig, Harvard Law School, on ICANN