[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [IFWP] At large membership

At 01:57 AM 10/20/99 , J. Baptista wrote:

>On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, William X. Walsh wrote:
> >
> > On 20-Oct-99 Joop Teernstra wrote:
> > > Failure or capture of the AL membership makes it even more
> > > important for
> > > Individual Domain Name Owners to press for their admission into
> > > the DNSO.
> >
> > Too bad there is no viable organization that can push for this
> > admission.
>agreed.  The idno need time to grow, an increased membership, something
>more robust.

Every other constituency was recognized,
warts and all, with the "understanding ;-)"
that they would grow into a more robust
and legitimate organization over time.

Why the double standard for the IDNO?


Jay Fenello,
New Media Relations
http://www.fenello.com  770-392-9480

"We are creating the most significant new jurisdiction
we've known since the Louisiana purchase, yet we are
building it just outside the constitution's review."
   --  Larry Lessig, Harvard Law School, on ICANN