[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Comment-Dnso] RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote
Let's see: I recommended against "voting". So, when I say that "if I were
to vote" x.uy.x should apply, but since I'm not convinced that we (all of
us) have agreed that voting is a good idea, I'm reserving "voting" until I
get a sense from others who are working on this that "voting" is a process
they have agreed to...
So, Chris, what's the recommendation? Different circumstances can elicit
different "agreements". Thankfully, we are evolved organisms, and capable of
complex thinking... Do I have to "vote" since I am still trying to
encourage the group to understand that "voting" is premature".
From: Christopher Ambler [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 1999 3:26 PM
To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA; 'Rita M. Odin'; firstname.lastname@example.org;
email@example.com; Farber,Michele A - LGA; 'PSWG';
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
Hold on a second. I didn't agree with voting for a co-chair, but I
was told that a vote like the one below would not count, and that
I had to either vote or not vote.
Marilyn, please vote or not vote. What you did below is NOT
Personal Opinion Only, of course
This address belongs to a resident of the State of Washington
who does not wish to receive any unsolicited commercial email
----- Original Message -----
From: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: 'Rita M. Odin' <OdinR@arentfox.com>; <email@example.com>;
<firstname.lastname@example.org>; Farber,Michele A - LGA <email@example.com>; 'PSWG'
Sent: Monday, August 16, 1999 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote
> While I don't support the idea of voting at this stage, should I vote, I
> would largely
> agree with Rita's outline and caveats. Marilyn Cade, AT&T