[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IFWP] Discussion of Constituency Formation
RIchard and all,
If you remember, there was some discussion and heated debate
with respect to Registrie(S) with respect to a constituency...
Of course I have yet to see a definition in terms of the DNSO,
what a legitimate "Constituency" is... So my comment is yet
again, LET THE GAMES CONTINUE, and/or THE DIVISIVENESS
Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> At 01:04 PM 4/10/99 -0400, Bret A. Fausett wrote:
> >Following the recent posts on the ICANN web site:
> > http://www.icann.org/dnso/constituency_groups.html
> Is says there:
> >The DNSO Formation Concepts statement adopted by the ICANN Board of Directors on March 4, and the draft
> >bylaw changes designed to implement that statement, call for the formation of a number of self-organized
> >Constituency Groups within the DNSO. In particular, these documents specify that the DNSO will include the
> >following initial Constituency Groups:
> > ccTLD registries
> > Commercial and business entities
> > gTLD registries
> gTLD registrieS ? There's only one... or does this mean "prospective
> registreis" ?
> firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com
> "Those who give up a little freedom for a little security
> will not have, nor do they deserve, either one"
> --Thomas Jefferson
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208