[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IFWP] ICANN Membership/Self selection works best



Eric and all,

  Compleatly agreed.  This has been the basic principal that the INEGroup
has supported from the very beginning...  It remains so...
Good point, although restated, Erick!  >;)

Weisberg wrote:

> Diane Cabell wrote:
>
> > Joop Teernstra wrote:
> >
> > > I agree with Ellen, that there is much merit in the idea of limiting ICANN
> > > membership to the assigned name and number stakeholders.
> >
> >
> > What about corporate holders?  Should they be permitted to vote in the at-large?
> >
>
> Beware of administrative nightmares.  Who wants to spend eternity arguing over which
> applicant is a stakeholder and which applied for no reason (not likely, btw)?  If
> someone thinks she wants to be a member, that should be enough UNLESS we can apply
> some MECHANICAL criteria, such as requiring an e-mail address (which suits me).

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208