[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: more internic fun, and an idea (fwd)
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: more internic fun, and an idea (fwd)
- From: Michael Dillon <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 18:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
- Organization: Memra Communications Inc.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 10:18:29 -0400
From: Mark Borchers <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: more internic fun, and an idea
On 4 Aug 99, at 6:36, melinda b. thompson wrote:
> i suggest that internic should prorate the yearly charge and have to
> subtract the prorated days that it takes them to process change orders from
> the yearly bill for the domain.
> each single one would be just a small ammount.
> however, with as many domains that have been held up in "manual processing"
> or whatever, it could add up.
As frustrating as it can be to deal with InterNIC, objectively it
should be noted that:
(1) Your proposal would be costly to enforce because it would be
necessary to determine whether the registrant submitted a correctly
formed template so that culpability could be determined.
(2) It wasn't that long ago that two-week processing was standard for
a lot of domain transactions. They raised the bar on themselves by
improving turnaround time through automatic processing. I'm not sure
that they should now have to pay a price for that.
NetworkTwo Communications Group
"Give beer to those who are perishing..." (Proverbs 31:6)