[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: The Battle In Seattle: From the Frontline
- To: Becky Burr <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, Esther Dyson <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Mike Roberts <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Fwd: The Battle In Seattle: From the Frontline
- From: Jay Fenello <Jay@Fenello.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 15:17:57 -0500
- Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
>Subject: The Battle In Seattle: From the Frontline
>Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 14:48:11 -0500
>The Battle In Seattle
> From the Frontline
>December 3, 1999
>It will take some time to tally up the results of the "Battle of Seattle"
>but there is no doubt the globalists are running scared. Before Seattle
>they were smug: the op-ed columnists in the Times and Wall Street Journal
>talked about WTO and NAFTA foes with the patronizing tones reserved for
>folks trying to use hand looms long after it was established cotton could
>be spun with electric power. "Luddites", members of a left-right
>"Halloween coalition," -- so the epithets ran.
>Americans understand, so the globalists claimed, that consumer choice is
>king; that the China market is huge. The unspoken corollary was that one
>day the United States would import ALL its manufactured goods from the
>likes of China and El Salvador. Only fools, those who refused to
>listen, couldn't understand that.
>But a couple of days of trade bureaucrats needing squads of cops in full
>riot gear to escort them to and from their hotels, and the globalist
>nation-breakers are a little less arrogant. President Clinton, nothing if
>not attuned to the political breezes of the moment, arrived in Seattle and
>suddenly began talking how the WTO should put labor standards on the
>Labor standards. Imagine that. A two-term Democrat who has always
>received the major union endorsements, who has made very effective use of
>union soft money political advertising, just now claims to have discovered
>that one his core constituencies might have legitimate interests at stake
>in the trade negotiations
> But as soon as talk of labor rights and standards crossed his lips,
>Clinton's buddies at the WTO rebuffed him. No question of it. Clinton,
>they sniffed, was trying to appease a domestic constituency. But the WTO
>wouldn't have it. Speaking out against child labor in the global trade
>talks was a definite no-no. Labor standards would "discriminate" against
>the "developing" countries.
>Happily the WTO doesn't - yet - have the last word here.
>A formidable coalition against it is now forming; nay, it already exists.
>It has passion on its side as well as reason. It includes
>environmentalists, important groups like Friends of the Earth, and the
>thousands of folks who marched on Monday in sea turtle outfits. (The WTO
>had declared American laws against fishing techniques that killed sea
>turtles illegal.) Its backbone is union members, who want keep decent jobs
>that provide decent benefits for themselves and hope their kids can have
>them too. It includes folks like Ralph Nader, a veteran activist, a
>fertile political mind. And of course it includes economic nationalists,
>people like Pat Buchanan who put America first without apology. Buchanan
>is the sole presidential candidate who opposes the WTO and probably the
>only one who had given the organization more than passing thought before
>The globalists fear this coalition, and now so much more than they did
>last Monday. Washington is so thick with lobbyists, politicians could
>delude themselves that only the folks who can fund campaigns with big soft
>money really count. But in a democracy, the soft money folks can be
>overwhelmed -- and that may be what's beginning. Millions of American
>recognize - even if they aren't union members or working class that
>America is a better place because workers can earn good wages, have access
>to health insurance, hold jobs on which they can support their families.
>You don't need a personal connection with Teamsters or steelworkers to
>realize this, just some common sense.
>After Seattle, the nation's politics seem pregnant with possibility. The
>elite consensus which wants Americans to buy and consume and not think too
>much about important questions looks suddenly shaky. Other issues may
>emerge as well. Perhaps immigration - where most Americans want a
>slowdown, and the Congress doesn't listen to them. Perhaps an hyper
>active foreign interventions supported by both Republican and Democratic
>elites, the folks who think American can solve every problem with force,
>or those who yearn for a new Cold War. Here, the elite hold on public
>opinion is even more tenuous than it is on trade.
> After Seattle, it looks like real democracy may be starting up again.
New Media Relations
"We are creating the most significant new jurisdiction
we've known since the Louisiana purchase, yet we are
building it just outside the constitution's review."
-- Larry Lessig, Harvard Law School, on ICANN