[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: [Membership] Structure of 'at large' membership



Subj:	Re: [Membership] Structure of 'at large' membership
Date:	99-02-02 17:37:26 EST
From:	BRPWIT
To:	Joseph@lebaron.net

The issue of BIG BROTHER?SISTER is unacceptable to most of us. Th all seeing
organization controlling everything is fraught with danger and monsterous
problems.

Regionalization makes more sense. For example, i thing someone (person /
organization) familiar with a regions language and customs can be more
effective than one who isn,t.

I can't see someone in BOSTON ruling and controlling a Domain name assignment
for someone in Beijing. I would think that an example would be in minimizing
inflammatory names. 

I know freedom of naming is controversial - but there are some names that are
not acceptable to people in the US that would have no meaning in TIBET.
thanks
steve witkin

---- Begin included message ----
The issue of BIG BROTHER?SISTER is unacceptable to most of us. Th all seeing
organization controlling everything is fraught with danger and monsterous
problems.

Regionalization makes more sense. For example, i thing someone (person /
organization) familiar with a regions language and customs can be more
effective than one who isn,t.

I can't see someone in BOSTON ruling and controlling a Domain name assignment
for someone in Beijing. I would think that an example would be in minimizing
inflammatory names. 

I know freedom of naming is controversial - but there are some names that are
not acceptable to people in the US that would have no meaning in TIBET.
thanks
steve witkin
---- End included message ----