From: Louis Touton
Dear Mr. Smith:
Your reconsideration request dated 1 February 2002 has been received and designated as request number RR 02-2. It has been posted at <http://www.icann.org/committees/reconsideration/smith-request-01feb02.htm>.
Based on an initial review of the request, it appears that it does not provide some of the information required by ICANN's reconsideration policy. That policy, which is posted at <http://www.icann.org/committees/reconsideration/recon-policy-04mar99.htm>, provides that the following information must be provided in any reconsideration request:
(The bracketed numbers above have been supplied to simplify references.)
The lack of this data makes it difficult for the reconsideration committee to assess whether any action should be taken. In particular, it appears that your request provides either no information or insufficiently specific information in response to items , , , and . Please note that the reconsideration committee has recently stated that failure to provide sufficiently clear and specific information makes it difficult for the committee to recommend that any action be taken in response to a reconsideration request. <http://www.icann.org/committees/reconsideration/rc01-4.htm#AnalysisofVeriosReconsiderationRequest>
It would be helpful if you would supplement your request as to items , , , and . To allow you time to submit supplemental information, the committee will not act on your request for seven days, until 9 February 2002.
Comments concerning the layout, construction and functionality of this site
should be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org.