Posted April 9, 1999
At a special meeting conducted via telephone on March 31, 1999, at 2:00
pm U.S. East Coast time, the Initial Board of Directors of the Internet
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers unanimously adopted bylaw changes
designed to establish the basic framework for the creation of the three
Supporting Organizations called for in the Bylaws (including specific
provisions establishing a Domain Name Supporting Organization), based
in large part on the DNSO
Formation Concepts statement adopted by the ICANN Board of Directors
on March 4, 1999. The changes adopted included several modifications
from the draft changes posted in advance of the meeting at http://www.icann.org/dnso/dnsobylaws1.html,
in response to public comment received on that draft.
The revised bylaws
are now posted, along with "red-lined" versions of the new
Supporting Organization provisions and of the technical
amendments adopted to conform the rest of the Bylaws to those changes.
Minutes of the March 31 meeting, describing in more detail the specific
changes, rationales, and responses to comment received, will be posted
no later than Friday, April 16.
Highlights of Bylaw Changes:
- Article VI
was replaced with a revised article establishing the framwork for establishment
of Supporting Organizations. Articles VI-A,-B,
were added to establish the specifics of the initial Supporting Organizations.
(For now, VI-A and VI-C are reserved until the Protocal Supporting Organization
and Address Supporting Organization are established. The structure
of the Domain Name Supporting Organization is set forth in Article VI-B.)
- In response to public comment, several modifications of the draft
versions of Articles VI and VI-B were adopted, including the following:
- Along with many clarifications and editorial changes, the Board
removed the specific requirement that no two Directors selected
by any Supporting Organization be citizens of any one Geographic
Region. Multiple commenters raised objections to this provision;
more importantly, the Board expects to deal comprehensively with
the issue of geographic representation in conjunction with the future
adoption of an At Large Membership structure.
- A quorum requirement was added for the Names Council.
- Clarification of the DNSO's responsibility for funding its administrative
and operational costs was added.
- The ability of any group to petition the Board for recognition as
a new or separate DNSO Constituency, without prior ICANN staff approval,
- Several changes to other provisions of the Bylaws (specifically, Article
VI, Section VI; Article V, Section 1; Article V, Section 2; Article V,
Section 4; Article V, Section 6; Article V, Section 9; Article V, Section
10; Article V, Section 11; Article V, Section 12; and Article V, Section
13) were adopted to make the provisions consistent with the new Article
Further Comment Requested:
In order to more fully explore an issue raised by one comment
submitted in reaction to the draft ICANN Bylaw changes the ICANN Board
seeks further comment on the following question:
Should the initial DNSO Constituencies currently identified as "ccTLD
registries" and "gTLD registries" be re-categorized as "open registries"
and "closed registries," identified according to whether the registry
is open to any registrant, worldwide ("open"), or is instead limited to
certain registrants based on geography, intended use, or other criteria
Please submit comments to email@example.com.
Comments concerning the layout, construction and
functionality of this site
should be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org.
©1999 The Internet Corporation for Assigned
Names and Numbers. All rights reserved.