Final Report and Recommendations of the GNSO Council's Transfers Task Force
Exhibit E: End Notes
30 November 2002
As updated 12 February 2003

Final Report and Recommendations of the GNSO Council's Transfers Task Force
Exhibit E: End Notes
30 November 2002
As updated 12 February 2003

[1] other submissions were received by the Task Force consisting of 4 "thank you for your submission/I agree"; 1 complaint re: pop-up ads repeated 3 times; and 1 comment intended for the Whois task force)

[2] From a Public Comment Period submission from Tim Ruiz (et al) (http://gnso.icann.org/dnso/dnsocomments/comments-transfer/Arc01/doc00000.doc)

[3] The Task Force heard this from a number of sources, but it is most readily conveyed in the collection of Registrants comments submitted by Danny Younger. These comments can be found at http://gnso.icann.org/dnso/dnsocomments/comments-transfer/Arc01/msg00006.html

[4] This proposal was formally submitted to the Task Force by the Registrar Constituency and formed the basis for much of the early work of the task force.

Broitman, Elana, and Ross Wm. Rader. "Inter-Registrar Domain Name Transfers; Principles & Processes for Gaining and Losing Registrars." ICANN-Registrars. October 1, 2001. ICANN DNSO Registrar Constituency. November 27, 2002. < http://www.icann-Registrars.org/pdfs/rc-irdx-091801-v1r0d8.PDF >

[5] General Counsel's Briefing Concerning the Implementation of Policies by Registrars and Registry Operators.

[6] If you've read this far, you have the sincerest thanks of the Task Force.

[7] 3 other comments were received. One was an administrative notice from the DNSO secretariat and the other two were requests for clarification by the Task Force Chair.

Page Updated 01-Mar-2003
©2003 The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. All rights reserved.