[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Membership] Re: [IFWP] ICANN comments deadline
Esther Dyson writes:
> Here is what the bylaws say:
> Because the DNSO and the Accreditation guidelines were so
> long/complex, we made sure to get them up especially early.
> On COI, we're not trying to railroad them through.... Please
> comment and we'll take the comments into account.
Your bylaws were written in secret without public
comment or oversight. This interim board is stacked
with mute people who were picked to support these
bogus bylaws and the whole premise of ICANN. The
entire inelegant and ungainly so-called Supporting
Organization proposal has been discredited and is
generally believed to be unworkable, undemocratic
and doomed to failure due to it's conplexity and
ponderous density. Wonder what of this is so hard
to grasp until considering the fact of how much you
all have to personally gain from ignoring same.
Dyson/Roberts appear set to railroad it all through
because they continue to ignore all such comments and
take nothing into account save the opinions of "true
believers". The organization they are attempting to
set up is unsustainable. It holds power to a limited
number of persons and their corporate backers. Ms.
Dyson and Mr. Roberts, due to their naivete, butt
ignorance, moral ineptitude or all of the above
have themselves opted in and have a great deal to
gain from this concentration of power. These two
and all their co-conspirators opt out anyone who
dis-agrees, collectively blocking any and all
comment while they strut about at the front of
cushy conference rooms worldwide pretending they
are the new overlords of our cyber destiny. Which
they most fucking certainly ain't.
Free Community Network _ email@example.com
http://fcn.net _ http://fcn.net/allisat