[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Membership] Fees for Organizations
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I would suggest extreme caution. There have been several mentions in
this thread about the constituency groups collecting ICANN dues. This
is not the responsibility of the constituency groups, nor was there
any mention of forming a collection process as part of the
constituency groups formation.
Diebold Incorporated / anycastNET Incorporated
- -----Original Message-----
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 1999 12:12 PM
To: Michael Sondow
Cc: Diane Cabell; Membership
Subject: Re: [Membership] Fees for Organizations
so make it a smaller percentage of revenues, or define it differently.
go with your second paragraph.
At 03:09 PM 01/05/99 -0400, Michael Sondow wrote:
>Esther Dyson a écrit:
>> Excuse me, but 1 percent of revenues is often equivalent to 10
>> profits. That is rather high....
>True enough. But what about enterprises that have high revenues and
>no profits because they are over-spending, paying their executives
>too-high salaries, or any of the other things they do to the
>unhappiness of shareholders (when these exist)? Should these pay no
>fees, when more financially responsible corporations are paying high
>Lest ICANN fall into the position of the tax-collector,
>across-the-board fees are more feasible.
Esther Dyson Always make new mistakes!
chairman, EDventure Holdings
interim chairman, Internet Corp. for Assigned Names & Numbers
1 (212) 924-8800
1 (212) 924-0240 fax
104 Fifth Avenue (between 15th and 16th Streets; 20th floor)
New York, NY 10011 USA
High-Tech Forum in Europe: 24 to 26 October 1999, Budapest
PC Forum: March 2000, Scottsdale (Phoenix), Arizona
Book: "Release 2.0: A design for living in the digital age"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0.2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----