[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [IFWP] At large membership

To: list@ifwp.org
Subject: RE: [IFWP] At large membership
From: "J. Baptista" <baptista@pccf.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 02:57:53 -0400 (EDT)
cc: idno-discuss@idno.org, domain-policy@lists.internic.net, ifwp@ifwp.org, comment-bylaws@icann.org
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.991019234609.dp-lists@dnspolicy.com>
Sender: owner-comments-bylaws@icann.org


On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, William X. Walsh wrote:

> 
> On 20-Oct-99 Joop Teernstra wrote:
> > Failure or capture of the AL membership makes it even more
> > important for
> > Individual Domain Name Owners to press for their admission into
> > the DNSO.
> 
> Too bad there is no viable organization that can push for this
> admission.  

agreed.  The idno need time to grow, an increased membership, something
more robust.

Cheers
Joe Baptista

--
Planet Communication & Computing Facility           212.894.3704 x1033
Public Access Internet Research Publisher           419.821.8581 fax
Centro Planetario de Communicaciones y Computacion  888.830.5744 x3223

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [IFWP] At large membership
  - From: Jay Fenello <Jay@Iperdome.com>

References:
- RE: [IFWP] At large membership
  - From: "William X. Walsh" <dp-lists@dnspolicy.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [IFWP] At large membership
Next by Date: Remarks on the proposed amendments to ICANN bylaws
Prev by thread: Re: [IFWP] At large membership
Next by thread: RE: [IFWP] At large membership
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread