[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Comment-Ip] Re: [IFWP] RE: GAC Draft Agenda
- To: "Richard J. Sexton" <richard@vrx.net>
- Subject: [Comment-Ip] Re: [IFWP] RE: GAC Draft Agenda
- From: Michael Sondow <msondow@iciiu.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 19:42:40 -0400
- CC: list@ifwp.org, "Twomey, Paul" <Paul.Twomey@noie.gov.au>, edyson@edventure.com, Members@IATLD.ORG, Becky Burr <bburr@ntia.doc.gov>, paul.scolese@mail.house.gov, mark.harrington@mail.house.gov, james.tierney@usdoj.gov, Mike Roberts <mmr@darwin.ptvy.ca.us>, comments@icann.org, "Vajrabukka, Nikki" <Nikki.vajrabukka@noie.gov.au>, "Roberts, Erica" <Erica.roberts@noie.gov.au>, WIPO comments <comment-ip@icann.org>, WTO Media <media@wto.org>, WTO Trade Policy Review Board <tprmaster@wto.org>, Larry Irving <lirving@ntia.doc.gov>, WTO Group on Basic Telecommunications <gbt@wto.org>, "Lidia Carlos-Silvetti (ERAD)" <Lidia.Carlos@wto.org>, Committee on Trade and Development <comtd@wto.org>, Trade and Development Center <devitd@wto.org>, WTO Forum on Regionalism <colette.obyrne@wto.org>, Information Technologies for Development <devitd@wto.org>
- References: <m10iKmJ-000Xy0C@ns1.vrx.net>
- Sender: owner-comment-ip@zephyr.isi.edu
Richard J. Sexton a écrit:
> No, they're all big ones. It would be nice Paul, if you could
> give us your thoughts on these topics even if they're only
> your personal observations. It might make things easier in Berlin
> if we all knew where we stood on the issues when we got there.
Nothing to worry about, Richard. ICANN's GAC is not going to
implement policies affecting international commerce.