[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IDNO:546] RE: A simple question



Kevin and all,

  A good point here with respect to the IDNO as it may indeed
relate to the ICANN and the DNSO.  But as you know Kelly,
the NC/PNC amongst others of the ICANN (Initial?) interim
Board, seem to believe that Individual Domain Name owners
are more of a nuisance than they are collectively worth and might
serve to upset their apple cart.

Kevin M. Kelly wrote:

> I'm about to collapse two point that Joop has made to highlight what I see
> as the most salient feature of the IDNO:
>
> Joop Teernstra wrote:
>
> >Dear Mark,
> >
> >If you do not care to be classified either commercial or non-commercial, if
> >you do not care to be put in a pro-NSI or an anti-NSI camp
> >you are just the kind of ordinary Domain Name Owner the IDNO constituency
> >was created for.
> >
> <snip>
> >
> >As an Association of Domain Name owners we will continue to exist and grow,
> >with or without ICANN.
>
> With some pain, we have grow beyond a discussion of pro- & anti-NSI (Satan
> or Savior--the truth is somewhere in between) into an organization that I
> believe will persist with or with ICANN.  The point being that is not a
> group organized against anything.  We are organized for the purpose of
> protecting the rights and access of individuals to DNS.
>
> --
> This message was sent via the idno mailing list. To unsubscribe send
> a message containing the line "unsubscribe idno" to listmanager@radix.co.nz.
> For more information about the IDNO, see http://www.idno.org/

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208