Re: Objection to Names Council Report on Mandatory Arbitration

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Kathy and all,

  I agree compleatly.  Not only is what you contend correct, but it
seems to me that the GA should have a vote for final approval
of any broad reaching and effecting policy such as this one as well.
Anything less would be a complete disregard for the White Paper
and the MOU as well...

KathrynKL@aol.com wrote:

> Sorry I could not get back to you earlier.  I find the Names Council and
> ICANN deadlines to be immensely troubling since they assume that a)
> constituencies are organized and fully operational and b) everyone is working
> on these issues fulltime.
>
> I don't see how the Preliminary Report can go to ICANN since it is missing
> parts and is misrepresentative of views in other parts.
>
> Would you be interested in writing the first draft of the official comment
> that NCDNHC should submit to the Names Council?
>
> Kathryn Kleiman
> >
> >  you should act now as the deadline for comment is july 31(?) or earlier on
> >  WG-A ADR.  you should submit now before the deadline set by provisional
> > Names
> >  Council followed by debate in santiago meetings(dnso general assembly,
> >  provisional names council and icann open meeting).
> >
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to ncdnhc-discuss as: Jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ncdnhc-discuss-1799I@lyris.isoc.org

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208