[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IFWP] [Fwd: Generalisimo Sola (DNSO) rebuffed.. was: [ga] Santiago DNSO GA Chair]
- To: DNSO GA <ga@dnso.org>, ICANN Comments <Comments@icann.org>
- Subject: Re: [IFWP] [Fwd: Generalisimo Sola (DNSO) rebuffed.. was: [ga] Santiago DNSO GA Chair]
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 23:56:45 +0100
- CC: list@ifwp.org, "jenglund@itaa.org" <jenglund@itaa.org>, "javier@aui.es" <javier@aui.es>, "Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com" <Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com>, "harris@cabase.org.ar" <harris@cabase.org.ar>, "h.hotta@hco.ntt.co.jp" <h.hotta@hco.ntt.co.jp>, "sastre@anwalt.de" <sastre@anwalt.de>, "scaf@idealaw.com" <scaf@idealaw.com>, "susan.anthony@wcom.com" <susan.anthony@wcom.com>, "tshapiro@mpaa.org" <tshapiro@mpaa.org>, "emaxwell@doc.gov" <emaxwell@doc.gov>, "bburr@ntia.doc.gov" <bburr@ntia.doc.gov>
- Organization: INEG. Inc. (Spokesman INEGroup)
- References: <37A6C70A.917A29B5@ix.netcom.com> <37A8C0B6.BAFE05A4@ix.netcom.com>
Brian and all,
I believe that I have made a similar sort of suggestion to the ICANN
(Initial?) Interim Board before. However I am extremely doubtful that
such a event is likely to take place given the errant behavior of that
very ICANN (Initial?) Interim Board itself, nor, if done, would I trust
that it would be sufficient.
Brian C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> Jeff and Everyone,
>
> Mr. Sola's demeanor and attitude has not gone unnoticed by many in the
> EU and EC of late. Some private discussions that I have had have
> expressed much dismay in his attitude and deliberance of dictating
> "Edicts" as if he were some sort of "Royal Line". I tend to agree
> with Jeff's and I have noticed of late, others characterization of
> Mr. Sola a "Generalisimo", as likely appropriate. It may be time for
> the
> ICANN Interim Board to take this fellow aside and council him
> sternly....
>
> Jeff Williams wrote:
>
> > Mark and all,
> >
> > Excellent rebuff of the Generalisimo.
> >
> > I believe though I do not know that Generalisimo Sola has either
> > not read the ICANN Bylaws and Berlin resolutions at all of closely
> > enough,
> > or he is attempting to misstate and there fore misuse those resolutions
> > and/or bylaws. I have tried to point this out along with many others
> > to the Generalisimo, and it seems that he is unable to grasp the
> > reality of the facts they currently exist...
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
> > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> > Contact Number: 972-447-1894
> > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Subject: Re: [ga] Santiago DNSO GA Chair
> > Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 09:18:36 -0700
> > From: "Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>
> > To: ga@dnso.org
> >
> > On 3 August 1999, Javier SOLA <javier@aui.es> wrote:
> > >
> > >Please show some respect for the bylaws and the consensus that they
> > >represent. They are the working tool that we have now. It has taken a very
> > >long time to reach this agreement. It is very bad policy to start playing
> > >with them for the benefit of a specific group, you might get the other
> > >groups that have reached consensus on the bylaws very annoyed.
> >
> > Okay! In that case, Mr. Sola, please declare all WG activity null and
> > void, because none of the WGs meet the following criteria, taken
> > directly from the ICANN bylaws, which you tout so strongly:
> >
> > Section 2: THE NAMES COUNCIL
> >
> > (b) The NC is responsible for the management of the consensus building
> > process of the DNSO. It shall adopt such procedures and policies as
> > it sees fit to carry out that responsibility, including the
> > designation of such research or drafting committees, working groups
> > and other bodies of the GA as it determines are appropriate to carry
> > out the substantive work of the DNSO. Such bodies shall include at
> > least one representative nominated by each recognized Constituency,
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > and shall provide appropriate means, as determined by the NC, for
> > input and such participation as is practicable under the circumstances
> > by other interested parties. Any reports or recommendations presented
> > to the NC by such bodies shall be posted on a web site accessible by
> > the public for public review and comment; absent clear justification,
> > which shall be publicly stated at the time of any action, the NC shall
> > not act on any report or recommendation until a reasonable time for
> > public comment has passed and the NC has reviewed and evaluated all
> > public comments received. The NC is responsible for ensuring that all
> > responsible views have been heard and considered prior to a decision
> > by the NC.
> >
> > No WG is composed of at laest one representative nominated by each
> > recognized Constituency.
> >
> > Furthermore, there is doubt as to whether there exist "recognized"
> > Constituencies:
> >
> > ICANN Resolutions, May 27, 1999:
> >
> > Resolution on DNSO Constituencies
> >
> > The Board discussed the applications received to date from groups
> > desiring to form Constituencies of the Domain Names Supporting
> > Organization. After consideration, the Board unanimously adopted the
> > following resolutions.
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the following Constituencies (as defined in Article
> > VI-B of the Bylaws) are provisionally recognized until the annual
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > meeting of the Board in 1999,
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > to operate in accordance with the
> > proposals received by the Corporation and ordered attached to these
> > minutes:
> >
> > ccTLD registries
> > Commercial and business entities
> > gTLD registries
> > Intellectual property
> > ISPs and connectivity providers
> > Registrars
> >
> > FURTHER RESOLVED, that the President of the Corporation is directed to
> > work with the Constituencies to amend their proposals to address
> > deficiencies noted by the Board, which amended proposals must include
> > a commitment of the submitting Constituency to hold a new election of
> > Names Council representatives promptly following the approval by the
> > Board of such amended proposal.
> >
> > FURTHER RESOLVED, that, when such proposals are so amended, the Board
> > should examine such proposals to determine whether the deficiencies
> > have been satisfactorily addressed and whether to extend the
> > recognition today made.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> --
> Brian C. Hollingsworth
> Sr. Legal Advisor, International House of Justice Internet
> Communications Affairs and Policy
> Advisory council for Public Affairs and Internet Policy, European
> Union
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208