- To: ga@dnso.org
- Subject: Re: [ga] We "decided" to defer the election of our ICANN board seats
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 16:26:34 +0100
- CC: "Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>,IFWP Discussion List <list@ifwp.org>,Domain policy <DOMAIN-POLICY@LISTS.INTERNIC.NET>,"jenglund@itaa.org" <jenglund@itaa.org>,"javier@aui.es" <javier@aui.es>,"Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com" <Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com>,"harris@cabase.org.ar" <harris@cabase.org.ar>,"h.hotta@hco.ntt.co.jp" <h.hotta@hco.ntt.co.jp>,"sastre@anwalt.de" <sastre@anwalt.de>,"scaf@idealaw.com" <scaf@idealaw.com>,"susan.anthony@wcom.com" <susan.anthony@wcom.com>,"tshapiro@mpaa.org" <tshapiro@mpaa.org>,"etrigar@teleline.es" <etrigar@teleline.es>,"Esther (The clueless) Dyson" <edyson@edventure.com>,"mmr@darwin.ptvy.ca.us" <mmr@darwin.ptvy.ca.us>,"linda_wilson@radcliffe.edu" <linda_wilson@radcliffe.edu>,"junsec@wide.ad.jp" <junsec@wide.ad.jp>,"gregcrew@iaccess.com.au" <gregcrew@iaccess.com.au>,"geraldine.capdeboscq@bull.fr" <geraldine.capdeboscq@bull.fr>,"gconrades@polarisventures.com" <gconrades@polarisventures.com>,"fitzsimmon@dnb.com" <fitzsimmon@dnb.com>,"gconrades@icann.org" <gconrades@icann.org>,"gregcrew@icann.org" <gregcrew@icann.org>,"roberts@icann.org" <roberts@icann.org>,commerce <commerce@mail.house.gov>,"emaxwell@doc.gov" <emaxwell@doc.gov>,"bburr@ntia.doc.gov" <bburr@ntia.doc.gov>
- Organization: INEG. Inc. (Spokesman INEGroup)
- References: <199909152244.PAA09749@agamemnon.home.com>
Mark and all,
I agree with you completely. I was not even allowed on the conference
call.
Just yet another example of lack of openness, transparency and
accountability
on the part of the pNC and the ICANN (Initial?) Interim Board.
Again I will ask and call for the NTIA to do it's DAM job! I pay taxes
that pays their salary!
Mark C. Langston wrote:
> Apparently, this morning's NC teleconference held the following gem:
> The DNSO GA has deferred its election of its ICANN board seats.
>
> I don't know about you, but I'm a member of the DNSO GA. I was never
> asked about this. Were you? Was anyone? This is ridiculous.
>
> There was no vote. There was no "determination of consensus". There
> were none of the things that would allow anyone to make such a
> determination, and yet, there it sits. We're not electing our
> ICANN board members now.
>
> I formally request that the DNSO NC as a whole, and each DNSO NC member
> as individuals refrain from speaking in any manner for the DNSO GA,
> until and unless there is a mandate from the GA itself that you do so.
>
> There aren't words for me to say this strongly enough.
>
> --
> Mark C. Langston LATEST: ICANN refuses Let your voice be heard:
> mark@bitshift.org to consider application for http://www.idno.org
> Systems Admin Constituency status from organized http://www.icann.org
> San Jose, CA individual domain name owners http://www.dnso.org
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208