[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN?
At 19:43 6/02/99 -0500, George Conrades wrote:
>Joop, what's your arguement for limiting to Domain name holders?
Is it
>simplicity or something more? If I am an interested student
sharing an email
>account am I not qualified to express an at large vote? Why are
you so
>concerned about enlarging the scope to at least the broad
constituency of
>Internet users? FYI, I have been a proponent of Domain names
only until I
>had the input of our International members on the
committee.
>
George, Daniel, Diane and all,
The whole idea is to move the discussion to this list. I am very
happy that you and other MAC members are taking it up.
My arguments for an ICANN of Domain Name and Address space
holders:
1. It is the easiest way to create a real electoral roll.
2. Low cost and simplicity of administration/verification (a
tick-box for an extra contribution at the time of
(re)registration.)
3. Real democracy has always progressed in small steps-- I
have had much personal experience with systems that profess to give a
voice to "the masses" ; it is an easy cloak for populist
tyrants.
4. The Net is a very open communication tool. The interested student
with the email account can still contribute her idea's freely and
convince others with good argument. If voting becomes the real issue,
then there will be democratic organisations that can represent the
disenfranchised. I am also proposing that "all users" can
be given a voice via petition and referendum.
5. I am afraid that ordinary Domain Name Owners will not join, if
they feel that "it's all a sham anyway"
To get enough real members is a major consideration. If the
membership base is too small, capture looms large.
6. Giving the vote to "all users" pretends to create that
"World Government" that you would wish to avoid.
7. It is not proper to give a vote to those who have no
"skin" in the system. It may go at the expense of those who
do.
8. The DNSO can be the vehicle for input from organisations
representing email-only users.
In the end it boils down to trust , I think. From my other posts on
the subject you may see that I am afraid of membership manipulation
made easy by using the conventional media (or large cyber corporations
like AOL or MSFT) to recruit members selectively.
I am not against an unlimited franchise, but i would like to see it
come about in stages, as the trust in the ICANN process grows.
Of course I could change my mind, like you did , but I have to hear
real convincing argument from the proponents on all those points above.
--Joop--
http://www.democracy.org.nz/model.html