[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN?

To: "Karl Auerbach" <karl@CaveBear.com>, "Eric Weisberg" <weisberg@texoma.net>
Subject: Re: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN?
From: "Dr Nii Quaynor" <quaynor@ghana.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 17:17:32 -0000
Cc: "George Conrades" <gconrades@polarisventures.com>, <rus@neteze.com>, "'Joop Teernstra'" <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>, "Diane Cabell" <cabell@mama-tech.com>, <membership@icann.org>
Sender: owner-membership@zephyr.isi.edu

>
>Most of the membership class structures which I have seen to date are very
>biased towards corporate interests.  As such it could well be that even if
>a category for individual membership is created it would be effectively
>powerless.
>
>My own suggestion: no classes.  Only people as members.  Anyone coming up
>with the initiation fee and the necessary identification can be a member.
>


I find this option very appealing.

Nii

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN?
  - From: Daniel Kaplan <dkaplan@terra-nova.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN?
Next by Date: RE: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN?
Prev by thread: Re: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN?
Next by thread: Re: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread