[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Membership] Re: [IFWP] RE: Drawing lines
- To: jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com, GENCLASS-L@rootsweb.com, PolandBorderSurnames-L@rootsweb.com
- Subject: Re: [Membership] Re: [IFWP] RE: Drawing lines
- From: BRPWIT@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 13:34:42 EST
- Cc: ICANN Comments <Comments@icann.org>, "etrigar@teleline.es" <etrigar@teleline.es>, "edyson@edventure.com" <edyson@edventure.com>, "mmr@darwin.ptvy.ca.us" <mmr@darwin.ptvy.ca.us>, "linda_wilson@radcliffe.edu" <linda_wilson@radcliffe.edu>, "junsec@wide.ad.jp" <junsec@wide.ad.jp>, "gregcrew@iaccess.com.au" <gregcrew@iaccess.com.au>, "geraldine.capdeboscq@bull.fr" <geraldine.capdeboscq@bull.fr>, "gconrades@polarisventures.com" <gconrades@polarisventures.com>, "fitzsimmon@dnb.com" <fitzsimmon@dnb.com>, "gconrades@icann.org" <gconrades@icann.org>, "gregcrew@icann.org" <gregcrew@icann.org>, "roberts@icann.org" <roberts@icann.org>, ICANN SO comments <comment-so@icann.org>, Icann Membership <membership@icann.org>
- Sender: owner-membership@zephyr.isi.edu
All of this membership concern - for individuals may turn out to be a tempest
in a teapot - if the FCC has its way.
The phone companies are bugging FCC to start allowing them to charge for local
calls ( ie internet connections). I know this was supposed to have been put to
bed- but apparrently it raised its head again - re LA DAILY NEWS 3 19 99
article.
"Rep C> COX (R) (newport beach ca) and D DREIER (R) (covina ca) were 2 of 11
signees of a letter to W KENARD FCC CHAIRMAN opposing these types of action.
If local calls are billed on a time basis- it will impact the internet and
intern probably make these issues of the individual membership rhetorical.
thanks steve witkin