[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Membership] Re: : [IFWP] COMMENTS ON M.A.C.RECOMMENDATIONS of MARCH 18

To: list@ifwp.org
Subject: Re: [Membership] Re: : [IFWP] COMMENTS ON M.A.C.RECOMMENDATIONS of MARCH 18
From: Michael Sondow <msondow@iciiu.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 19:22:36 -0400
CC: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>, Izumi AIZU <izumi@anr.org>, ICANN MAC list <membership@icann.org>
References: <000201be8530$43da58a0$ecaf6cc7@hawk.lvrmr.mhsc.com>
Sender: owner-membership@zephyr.isi.edu

Roeland M.J. Meyer a écrit:

> You have just hit upon one of the many reasons that I have argued against a California home for what is now the ICANN. Delaware is a much better place for these, or most, things corporate. The ICANN BoD, or course, chooses not to listen to good sense.

Don't kid yourself, Roeland, Sims knew perfectly well what he was
doing when he chose California.

Prev by Date: Re: [Membership] Re: [IFWP] COMMENTS ON M.A.C. RECOMMENDATIONS ofMARCH 18
Next by Date: Re: [Membership] Re: : [IFWP] COMMENTS ON M.A.C.RECOMMENDATIONS of MARCH 18
Prev by thread: Re: [Membership] Re: [IFWP] COMMENTS ON M.A.C. RECOMMENDATIONS ofMARCH 18
Next by thread: [Membership] [Fwd: [IFWP] Re: Internet Governance?!]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread