ASO

  • . (1) |
  • 2 (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (2) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (2) |
  • A (2) |
  • A (2) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (2) |
  • A (2) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (2) |
  • A (2) |
  • A (2) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (2) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (2) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |
  • A (1) |

Participation at meetings

There is an ongoing issue about how to have real and effective remote participation at ICANN meetings.

As most of you will hopefully be aware, a specific website is set up for each meeting - you can see Delhi's here: http://del.icann.org/, and Paris' at http://par.icann.org - where a webpage is provided for every meeting. That webpage contains its own chatroom; it contains the agenda, links to presentations , and, when over, a link to the transcript.

However there is still a disconnect and an advantage if you are physically in the room. As an Internet organisation trying to serve a global audience with limited resources, ICANN wants to get to the point where participation is real and possible remotely.



Add your ideas, have a discussion, review what others think at this dedicated forum to improving remote participation.

 

The biggest issue from experience is time. Meetings start and go extremely quickly from the perspective of someone not in the room. Often meetings happen at inappropriate times for those that wish to attend. Sometimes by the time a question raised remotely can be introduced into the conversation, the conversation has moved on. And this in itself discourages interaction.

So the question is: what can be done to fix this? Is the answer to make sure agendas are posted earlier? How can this be enforced? Should questions be accepted ahead of time? Should meetings on one topic be stretched over several days, allowing for more effective remote input?

What are the practicalities? How do you get the physical meeting to take remote input seriously? What needs to be done? ICANN is very interested in your views on this. And for that reason we have set up a forum on this site in order to help the community discuss, review, brainstorm and formulate possible solutions which ICANN will then experiment with in an effort to provide the global community with a more effective route into the organisation's work.



Add your ideas, have a discussion, review what others think at this dedicated forum to improving remote participation.

End of Summer Time in Europe and Remote Participation

Europe moved from summer time to winter time last night but the California won't do so until next weekend. This means that for the week of the ICANN meeting the time difference between Europe and the US is different than normal.

Anyone who wants to follow the sessions at this week's meeting will need to take account of the difference in the normal time calculations this week.
On Monday at 9am in Los Angeles it will be 5pm in Brussels and 4pm in Lisbon which is one hour earlier than last week.

IPv6 addresses for private networks

Yesterday's IPv6 deployment session ran over slightly, so there was no time to discuss a question Christian Chu Fook of Grenada's GD Management Group, asked. Nonetheless, it's a good question and touches on an active area of discussion in the IETF's IPv6 WG.


is there a scope within IPv6, like IPv4, that is reserved for private networks?

IPv6 Deployment Panel

24 يونيو 2007 - 15:00
24 يونيو 2007 - 16:30

This session takes place in the San Geronimo A/B room between 3 and 4.30pm (UTC -4) on Sunday 24 June 2007.

 

What it is?

This session is a 90 minute panel discussion focusing on the issues involved in deploying IPv6 on an IPv4 network. Although IPv6 is very similar to IPv4, there are enough differences that's it's necessary to ensure many components on deployed networks will be able to handle IPv6 as well as IPv4.

Questions for the public forum?

ICANN has changed the method by which it draws input into its public meetings - including the public forum - in an effort to make it easier to interact, and hence encourage greater interaction.

-----------

For the ICANN public forum on Thursday 29 March 2007

Please note: You need to register with the site and be logged in to gain access to the chatrooms

Webcast | Audiocast | Chatroom | Forum


-------------