ICANN participation

ALAC members,

I welcome the opportunity to convey policy interests and positions from
the At Large to the Board. Unfortunately, Board members came away from
their meeting with ALAC with a sense that the ALAC focused primarily on
procedural issues rather than prioritizing policy discussion.

If ALAC wants to say that it has not heard user concern or cannot find
evidence of individual Internet user interests on policy matters, that
is fine, but if the group is engaged in policy discussions, even those
in progress, I get the sense that Board members would prefer to get a
briefing on such issues than to hear procedural debates or be asked to
answer questions.

Thanks,
--Wendy

--
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@seltzer.org
Visiting Professor, American University Washington College of Law
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
http://www.chillingeffects.org/
https://www.torproject.org/

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann...

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac