[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Competition; was Re: [Membership] ICANN: The Issue of Membership---

To: <membership@icann.org>
Subject: RE: Competition; was Re: [Membership] ICANN: The Issue of Membership---
From: a@help.org
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 1999 22:35:48 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <199902062329.SAA24101@panix3.panix.com>
Reply-To: <a@help.org>
Sender: owner-membership@zephyr.isi.edu

Note that the agreement Internic and DOC is a cooperative agreement.  These
are substantially different than a contract.  DOC has substantially less
authority in this case.  It was also transferred to NTIA which is concerned
with general policy rather than technical or operational issues.

Russ Smith
http://consumer.net



>The Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) at the NTIA in Nov. 1998
>didn't provide any authority to transfer any assets. It only
>provided auhtority of the Dept of commerce to make contracts.

References:
- Re: Competition; was Re: [Membership] ICANN: The Issue of Membership---
  - From: Ronda Hauben <ronda@panix.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [Membership] MAC reports and models-New URLs
Next by Date: Re: [Membership] MAC reports and models-New URLs
Prev by thread: Re: Competition; was Re: [Membership] ICANN: The Issue of Membership---
Next by thread: Re: Competition; was Re: [Membership] ICANN: The Issue of Membership---
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread