[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN?

To: George Conrades <gconrades@polarisventures.com>
Subject: Re: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN?
From: Eric Weisberg <weisberg@texoma.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 09:50:20 -0600
Cc: "'rus@neteze.com'" <rus@neteze.com>, "'Joop Teernstra'" <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>, Diane Cabell <cabell@mama-tech.com>, membership@icann.org, list@ifwp.org, discuss@dnso.org, domain-policy@internic.net, domain-policy@open-rsc.org
References: <649B468310ACD211A26600A0C9EBC62F025227@ntserver.polarisventures.com>
Sender: owner-membership@zephyr.isi.edu

Do these comments indicate a preference for limiting
membership to certain categories of people/organizations?

George Conrades wrote:
> 
> rus, I am inclined to think we should move slowly on opening up membership
> in an unlimited way UNTIL we understand how the membership process works
> against a more understood or qualified database of constituents.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rus@neteze.com [mailto:rus@neteze.com]

> i do not qualify for any of the categories of membership suggested, yet i
> use the internet and believe i have a right to participate in democratic
> decision making.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN?
  - From: Karl Auerbach <karl@CaveBear.com>

References:
- RE: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN?
  - From: George Conrades <gconrades@polarisventures.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN?
Next by Date: Re: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN?
Prev by thread: RE: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN?
Next by thread: Re: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread