[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Membership] Singapore - how it should be discussed

To: Michael Gendron <mgendron@gcstech.com>
Subject: Re: [Membership] Singapore - how it should be discussed
From: K S LIM <ks_lim@logchina.com.sg>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 10:45:36 +0930
CC: "membership@icann.org" <membership@icann.org>
Organization: LOGIC GROUP OF COMPANIES
References: <01BE5C58.F7E1CB40@toshiba-164-204.nycap.rr.com>
Reply-To: ks_lim@logchina.com.sg
Sender: owner-membership@zephyr.isi.edu

Michael Gendron wrote:
> 
> Well. I was just trying to determine how Singapore was decided on. It is important for all voices to be heard, but the voices should be civil.  If I added fuel to any inopportune fires, I apologize.
> 
> Michael Gendron
Dear Michael
You have been very civil compared to some others.  I don't think any
body would have problem with you.
Best regards.
-- 
KS LIM
LOGIC GROUP OF COMPANIES
180 Cecil Street, #15-03
Bangkok Bank Building
SINGAPORE 069546
TEL:65-2211208,FAX:65-2221170
E-MAIL: ks_lim@logchina.com.sg
        kslim@singnet.com.sg

References:
- [Membership] Singapore - how it should be discussed
  - From: Michael Gendron <mgendron@gcstech.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [Membership] A Model for Community & Global - complete version
Next by Date: [Membership] Is "head to head" the answer for ICANN?
Prev by thread: [Membership] Singapore - how it should be discussed
Next by thread: [Membership] RE: Government Advisiort Committee
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread