Registry Operator's Proposal
[A Registry Operator's
Proposal is to be submitted as part of every new TLD application. In case
of applications for unsponsored TLDs, the registry operator will be the applicant
and should prepare and submit the proposal as part of the application. In
the case of applications for sponsored TLDs, the sponsoring organization (or,
where the sponsoring organization has not yet been formed, organization(s)
or person(s) proposing to form the sponsoring organization) will be the applicant.
The sponsoring organization should select the proposed registry operator,
have it prepare the Registry Operator's Proposal, and submit it as part of
the application.
Please place the legend
"CONFIDENTIAL" on any part of your description that you have listed
in item F3.1 of your Statement of Requested Confidential Treatment of Materials
Submitted.
The Registry Operator's
Proposal should be separately bound (if more than one volume, please sequentially
number them) and labeled: "Registry Operator's Proposal." and must
cover all topics described below. This page, signed on behalf of the registry
operator, should be included at the front of the Registry Operator's Proposal.]
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
Eurafnet is the Luxembourg holding company of an
Internet group which owns 100 % of
Internet-fr SA and SAM Namebay. Eurafnet is controlled
by Mrs Patricia Husson, a Monaco citizen, the other shareholders being Mr
Marco Rinaudo and Mr Domenico Surace, both Italian citizens.
Internet-fr is a French company founded in 1995
. Based In Massy near Paris, it has a significant expertise in the field of
critical web hosting. Its two managing directors are Marco Rinaudo and Domenico
Surace.
Namebay is a Monaco based company which has specialized in
domain name registration. It is one of the CORE founder (#18) and is a fully
operational ICANN accredited registrar for .com, .net and .org. This firm
is managed by Mrs Patricia Husson.
CSL is a Düsseldorf based ISP company founded in
1977. It is owned and managed by Mr Siegfried Langenbach and started offering
Internet services in 1994. It is one of the CORE founder (#11). It is used
to run large database-applications. CSL developed a registry-software for
CORE also known as SRS (shared registry system) when CORE became one of the
5 test-bed-registrars with ICANN.
Netbay is a Monaco company founded in 1997 which
shares are owned by Mr and Mrs Husson. Formerly, one of its activities was
domain name registration. This registrar activity was transferred to Namebay
in July 1999, and its other remaining activity (Electronic Document Management
Systems) has been recently shifted into a Sophia Antipolis company belonging
to Mrs Husson.
Mrs Patricia Husson and Mr Siegfried Langenbach
who both share similar views on the Internet development have decided to apply
jointly for the dot fin domain name registry.
To implement their project, they plan to use
the existing Netbay company as a joint
venture company.
In October 2000, several operations will be
conducted:
Netbay
equity capital will be increased from EUR 228,000 to EUR 2,000,000. The new
shares will be subscribed by Eurafnet, Mrs Husson, Mr Langenbach and CSL;
The shareholder ownership will
be then as follows: on one hand, 51 % for Eurafnet and Mrs. Husson, on the
other hand, 49 % for Mr. Langenbach and CSL;
In addition, Netbay will receive from its shareholders additional
EUR 2,500,000 in cash in current account and cash commitments. Netbay shareholders
have the capability to bring in the company new equity funds ( in the form
of capital and current accounts payments) up to EUR 10 million, if the 50
% level of confidence revenue schedule is not matched in time and if needed
for the development of the project.
Mr. Siegfried Langenbach will be appointed
as a director and vice president;
CSL
GmbH will be appointed as a director;
Netbay is sure that the appraisal of its application
has to take into account the combined
human, technical and financial resources of the Eurafnet Group, CSL and their
shareholders.
D1. The first section
of the Registry Operator's Proposal (after the signed copy of this page) should
be a listing of the following information about the registry operator. Please
key your responses to the designators (D1, D2, D3, etc.) below.
D2.
The full legal name, principal address, telephone and fax numbers, and e‑mail
address of the registry operator.
Full legal name : SAM NETBAY
Principal address : 24, boulevard Princesse Charlotte
- MC 98000 MONACO
Telephone number : +377 97 97 21 21
Fax number : +377 97 97 21 22
e-mail address : ph@netbayregistry.net
D3.
The addresses and telephone and fax numbers of all other business locations
of the registry operator.
Technical services : CSL GmbH
Address : Rathausufer 16 , 40213 Düsseldorf Germany
Telephone number : +49 211 867670
Fax number : +49 211 8676710
e-mail address : sl@netbayregistry.net
Administration :
Address : 24 Boulevard Princesse Charlotte
MC 98000 MONACO
Telephone number : +377 97 97 21
Fax number : +377 97 97 21 22
e-mail address : md@netbayregistry.net
D4.
The registry operator's type of business entity (e.g., corporation, partnership,
etc.) and law (e.g., Denmark) under which it is organized.
Type of business entity : Société Anonyme Monégasque (SAM)
Law
: monégasque (Monaco)
D5.
URL of registry operator's principal world wide web site.
netbayregistry.net or www.netbayregistry.net
D6.
Dun & Bradstreet D‑U‑N‑S Number (if any) of registry
operator.
SIC code (APE) : 737
D7.
Number of employees.
Not applicable since Netbay is a new joint
venture dedicated to the dot fin registry project.
Netbay presently employs only one person,
but the staff of the mother companies groups amounts to 50 persons. Netbay
staff will be increased according to its Business Plan specifications described
in D13.2.
D8.
Registry operator's total revenue (in US dollars) in the last‑ended
fiscal year.
Not applicable for the reasons stated in D0
and in D7. However, 1999 revenues for CSL and Internet-fr are respectively
EUR 3,000,000 and EUR 1,300,000.
2000 expected revenues amount to EUR 10,000,000
for CSL and EUR 3,000,000 for Internet-fr.
D9.
Full names and positions of (i) all directors, (ii) all officers, (iii) all
relevant managers, and (iv) any persons or entities owning five percent or
more of registry operator.
Directors
:
Patricia Husson ( Chairman)
Siegfried Langenbach (to be appointed in October-
Vice Chairman)
Robert Husson
Mathieu Dierstein
Marco Rinaudo (to be appointed in October)
Domenico Surace (to be appointed in October)
CSL (to be appointed in October)
Officers and relevant managers have not been yet
appointed (see D0).
CSL and Internet-fr have proven in the past their
ability to hire good technicians and efficient staff members. The directors
of Netbay with their extensive business experience will actively contribute
to the selection of Netbay staff. Incidentally, some staff members of CSL
and Internet-fr will join Netbay.
Shareholders:
see D0
D10.
Name, telephone and fax number, and e‑mail address of person to contact
for additional information regarding this proposal. If there are multiple
people, please list all their names, telephone and fax numbers, and e‑mail
addresses and describe the areas as to which each should be contacted.
Business
/ Financial :
Mathieu Dierstein
Eurafnet (director)
+33 609 774 360
md@netbayregistry.net
Software
/ Protocol / Database :
Siegfried Langenbach
+49 211 86767 0
sl@netbayregistry.net
Thomas Serval
Savoirweb.com sarl (consultant)
+33 662 624 908
Legal
(USA):
David Maher
Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal
+1 312 876 8055
Legal
(Monaco and USA):
David Manasse
Attorney at Law NY Bar
+377 93 50 29 21
D11.
The full legal name, principal address, telephone and fax numbers, e‑mail
address, and Dun & Bradstreet D‑U‑N‑S Number (if any)
of all subcontractors identified in item D15.3 below.
Address: Rathausufer 16, D-40213 Düsseldorf
D&B Number:
Telephone number: +49 211 867670
Fax number: +49 211 8676710
e-mail address: info@nrw.net
Address:2-12, Chemin des Femmes Massy F-91300
D&B Number:
Telephone number: +33 (0)1 64 53 12 12
Fax number: +33 (0)1 64 53 12 19
e-mail address : info@internet-fr.net
II. BUSINESS CAPABILITIES AND PLAN
D12.
The second section of the Registry Operator's Proposal (after the "General
Information" section) is a description of the registry operator's Business
Capabilities and Plan. This section must include a comprehensive, professional‑quality
business plan that provides detailed, verified business and financial information
about the registry operator. The topics listed below are representative of
the type of subjects that will be covered in the Business Capabilities and
Plan section of the Registry Operator's Proposal.
[
ICANN will extensively review and analyze this section of the Registry Operator's
Proposal. The content, clarity, and professionalism of this section will be
important factors in ICANN's evaluation of applications. We strongly recommend
securing professional assistance from financial and management consultants
to aid in the formulation of your business plan, in securing the necessary
sources of financing, and in preparation of this section.]
D13. The Business Capabilities and Plan section should consist
of at least the following:
D13.1. Detailed description of the registry
operator's capabilities. This should describe general capabilities and activities.
This description also offers the registry operator an opportunity to demonstrate
the extent of its business and managerial expertise in activities relevant
to the operation of the proposed registry. The following items should, at
a bare minimum, be covered :
The Eurafnet group and CSL together through
Netbay are forming the suitable team for the dot fin registry management.
They have the capacity to devote the right
internet technical staff with proven experience in registry / registrar environments
for the implementation of their project. They benefit from the seniority and
successful experience in finance and insurance related sectors of some of
the team members.
They bring their full backing to Netbay and
they are ready to support the project with the necessary financial resources.
Netbay ‘s project is supported by active members
of the finance community. It has the capability to demonstrate that the dot
fin registry will help the Internet community by allowing the old economy
entities as well as the newcomers in the financial sector to improve their
offer.
D13.1.1.
Company information. Date of formation, legal status, primary location, size
of staff, formal alliances, references, corporate or other structure, ownership
structure.
See Appendix D 13.1.1 "LEGAL
ORGANIZATION CHART"
Date of formation : 05 05 1997
Legal status :
Existing company under the laws of Monaco
Primary location : 24 Boulevard Princesse Charlotte MC 98000 Monaco
Size of staff :
1 (see D0 and D7)
Formal alliances : With CSL and Internet-fr (see D 15.3)
References : Société
Générale (bank) 16, Avenue de la Costa MC 98000 Monaco
Corporate structure : SAM (Société Anonyme Monégasque) with a Board of Directors
Ownership
structure : Eurafnet and Mrs.
Husson (51%); Mr. Siegfried Langenbach and CSL( 49%)
Date of formation : 08 06 1977
Legal status :
Existing company under the laws of Germany
Primary location : Rathausufer 16, D-40213 Düsseldorf
Size of staff :
18 (see D0 and D7)
Formal alliances : With Netbay (see D 15.3)
References : Commerzbank Düsseldorf
( Germany )
Corporate structure : GmbH (equivalent to Ltd.)
Ownership structure : Mr. Siegfried Langenbach ( 100%)
Internet-fr
Date of formation : 05 10 1995
Legal status : Existing company under
the laws of France
Primary location : 2-12, Chemin des Femmes Massy F-91300
Size of staff :
25 (see D0)
Formal alliances : With Netbay (see D 15.3) and Namebay
References : BICS (bank) in Massy
France
Corporate structure : SA (société anonyme) with a Board of Directors
Ownership structure : Eurafnet (100%)
Eurafnet
Date of formation : 17 12 1999
Legal status : Existing company under
the laws of Luxembourg
Primary location : 16, rue Emmanuel Servais L- 2535 Luxembourg
Size of staff :
0 (see D0)
Formal alliances : Holding company of Internet-fr and Namebay
References : Banque Privée Edmond
de Rothschild (Luxembourg)
Corporate structure : SA (société anonyme) with a Board of Directors
Ownership
structure : Mrs. Patricia
Husson (52%); PAAR SA (48%), this company being owned equally by Mr. Marco
Rinaudo and Mr. Domenico Surace
Date of formation : 29 06 1999
Legal status :
Existing company under the laws of Monaco
Primary location : 24 Boulevard Princesse Charlotte MC 98000 Monaco
Size of staff :
2 (see D0)
Formal alliances : With Internet-fr
References : Société Générale (bank) 16, Avenue de la Costa MC 98000 Monaco
Corporate structure : SAM (Société Anonyme Monégasque)
with a Board of Directors
Ownership structure : Eurafnet (100%)
D13.1.2.
Current business operations. Core capabilities, services offered, products
offered, duration of provision of services and products.
Internet-fr offers two main types of service
to its corporate customers mainly in France:
Critical
web hosting (shared and co-located servers);
Leased
lines for IP access.
Internet-fr is:
Active
member of AFNIC( dot fr TLD)
Local
registry for RIPE
ISO
9001
Microsoft Certified Solution
Provider
WAS (Web Attached Storage)
certified by AUSPEX
Internet-fr benefits from numerous
peering agreements with, for example, BULL, Abovenet, COLT, Globix, Carrier1,
Level 3, PSINet, Belgacom,…
CSL is ISP (Internet Service Provider)
for companies only (no individual customers), restricted to the region of
Nordrhein Westfalen = nrw (in revenue the biggest of the16 states of Germany,
18 million inhabitants)
CSL provides additionally services in Database applications
and statistical analysis.
From the list of customers to be mentioned:
·
Henkel
·
Ferrero
·
VDI
( German association of engineers )
·
Weight
Watchers
·
Madakom
( Standardization association for
retailers in Germany )
·
Detekom
( consultant company of Deutsche Telekom )
·
Ericsson
·
E-plus
( 3rd GSM provider in Germany )
·
Stadtwerke
Düsseldorf ( civil services of town )
·
Ricoh
·
Grey
·
Last
not least CORE ( Internet Council of Registrars )
D13.1.3. Past business operations/entity
history. History, date of formation, legal status/type of entity, initial
services, duration of provision of services and products.
Founded in 1972, the company was transformed in
a GmbH in 1977, originally providing statistical analysis for market research
companies and departments. Database services were added in 1990, Internet
services in 1994.
CSL is used to run large database-applications
as examples:
On-line database for Weight Watchers in Germany,
1 million members with behavior.
For Madakom, a standardization body for manufacturers
and retailers, collecting 1 million records per week from 200 outlets of barcode-marked
products for statistical analysis. Online data for 2 years (= 104 weeks).
For Detekom, a Deutsche Telekom owned company, a
survey on 500,000 employees and former employees before the split of Deutsche
Telekom's predecessor.
CSL programmed and actually runs the registrar environment
for CORE ( Internet Council of Registrars ). CORE was chosen by ICANN as one
of 5 test-bed registrars back in April 1999. Originally, CORE intended to
run a registry for some TLDs. A software called SRS ( shared registry system
) was developed to handle them. When CORE become a registrar, the software
was modified, thereby allowing CORE members to use it as a gateway to the
NSI registry. Almost 1 million domains were registered and maintained by SRS.
Unlike the software run by NSI as registry, this is a so called heavy-registry-software,
having almost all data stored at the registry level, making it easier for
the registrars.
Siegfried Langenbach was a cofounder and the first
head of the Supervisory Board of DENIC, the German registry, which is the
2nd largest registry in the world after NSI.
Recognized as an expert, CSL is working together
with the EU commission to define the technical aspects of a TLD for the EU.
Internet-fr has built up a large customer
base including well known organizations and companies, such as :
Vivendi,
Century 21, Argus de la Presse, Green Peace, UNICEF,
St Gobain Emballages, MAN, Virgin Cola, Geophysique,
Oberthur, Cilas (CEA/Matra), Dassault Systems,Lufthansa,
Jean-Paul Gaultier, Kenzo, Salvatore Ferragamo, Christian Lacroix,
OCDE, INSEE, FIANET (Axa group), Abeille Assurances,…
D13.1.4.
Registry/database/Internet related experience and activities. Experience with
database operation, Internet service provision.
CSL is already acting in the registry
/ registrar operation field.
Since beginning of the test-bed for com-net-org
domains, CORE has registered almost 1 million names at NSI-Registry using
the technology, infrastructure and software developed by CSL.
Recognized as an expert, CSL is working together
with the EU commission to define the technical aspects of a TLD for the EU.
The same is valid for CORE.
With the CORE-project, CSL proved that it was able
to run a reliable registry with a significant number of registrations ( almost
1 million in the first year ). One of CSL s’ aim is to help and train people
of developing countries to build their own registry.
Internet-fr
and its management
team have accumulated significant
experience in database management and connectivity. It has developed the software
used by its sister company Namebay (a registrar) which enables it to communicate
under good conditions with NSI Registry.
Since 1995, Internet-fr has hosted several large
data bases for major companies in its Massy data center. It is able to optimize
and secure the data flows concerning these data bases. Internet-fr monitors
the data bases and, when necessary, implements special procedures to ensure
the best response from the data bases. It is a specialist in data base clustering.
Internet-fr has developed its IP backbone,
giving it an international operator status.
D13.1.5. Mission. The registry operator's
mission and how it relates to expansion into the registry operation field.
The registry operator mission is to provide the
financial community with a clearly identified distinctive top level domain
name that will encompass the new fields of finance and represents the old
economy financial institutions.
It will act independently of any registrars
by not providing registrar services itself and thus improving competition
and fairness in the registration services.
It will
maintain internet stability through the sponsoring organization that will
deal with typical financial industry problems.
It will enhance the DNS by avoiding confusion between
commercial and financial activities and thereby improving the trust of the
internet community into the DNS.
It will extend the diversity of the DNS.
It will use the appropriate protection of rights
through its dispute resolution policy.
The owners of Netbay (ultimately its major shareholders
Mrs. Husson and Mr. Langenbach) have contacts in Africa and Latin America.
If possible, they will assist the staff of the countries on these continents
to become experienced in running a registry and improve, when necessary, the
related functions in their countries.
D13.1.6. Management.
Qualifications
and experience of financial and business officers and other relevant employees.
Please address/include past experience, resumes, references, biographies.
Siegfried
Langenbach (55) has an engineering degree in electronics.
Before becoming independent, he worked for UNIVAC, a Sperry Corporation
company.
Either he or his company is member of :
RIPE NCC;
DENIC, the organization that runs the .de domain
(with over 2 million domains registered); Siegfried was the first Chair of
the Oversight Board;
CORE;
Participant in IETF;
Member of the ISPCP (Internet Service Provider constituency
of DNSO, ICANN)
Former member of MAC, ICANN's Member Advisory Committee.
Marco Rinaudo (28), Chairman of Internet-fr
SA graduated from Universita degli Studi di Pisa and Orsay University (Paris
XI) – Masters degree in Computer Science (1994). He is one of the founders
of Internet-fr. After graduating, he worked for BULL on the implementation
of the Paris Subway IP network.
Domenico Surace (27), CEO of Internet-fr SA, graduated
from Universita degli Studi di Pisa and Orsay University(Paris XI) – Masters
degree in Computer Science (1994). He is one of the founders of Internet-fr.
After graduating, he worked also for BULL on the implementation of the Paris
Subway IP network.
Patricia
Husson, Chairman
of the Eurafnet Group, has long standing experience in the insurance sector.
She was the owner of the largest French insurance brokerage house which was
sold in 1992 to Marsh and Mc Lennan, the world's largest insurance broker.
Today, she operates a brokerage insurance group established in Monaco. Since
1996, she has made successful investments in high tech companies.
Mathieu Dierstein (58),
CFO of the Eurafnet Group, has a PHD in Mathematics (Agrégation - 1967) and
graduated from Columbia University (Finance- Honors) in 1973. He held numerous
positions in industrial companies such as Roussel Uclaf (HMR) and Valeo. He
has been a member of the Executive Committee of Banque Vernes in Paris in
charge of its M&A Department.
D13.1.7.
Staff/employees. Current staff size, demonstrated ability to expand employee
base, hiring policy, employee training, space for additional staff.
Altogether, CSL and the Eurafnet employ almost 50
qualified technicians.
Since Netbay is a joint venture, the relevant staff
still have to be appointed for the registry project (see D0, D9 and D13.2.8).
CSL employs 18 persons with extensive
experience in database-technology and domain-related issues such as name service,
WHOIS, web, etc.
Being a small company, people join CSL because of
personal recommendations and their desire to take part in new and interesting
tasks.
Typically, the same remarks can be expressed for
Eurafnet staff with a headcount of 25.
Internet-fr has recently rented additional office
and technical space in Massy and in Paris (totaling approx 700 m2)
CSL has considerable space available in its
Düsseldorf offices.
Concerning Netbay and its future expanded
administrative facilities, the actions required to secure the necessary office
space are in progress (see 13.2.8).
D13.1.8.
Commercial general liability insurance. Address/include amount of insurance
policy, provider of policy, plans for obtaining additional insurance.
Netbay has subscribed several insurance policies
covering its business activities.
The most important ones concern :
-
Premises and operations liability insurance ("assurance
responsabilité exploitation");
. the limit of liabilities amounts to EUR 4.5 million,
. the insurance broker is Samcar located 24,
boulevard Princesse Charlotte – 98000 Monaco
. the insurance company is Albingia located
109-111, rue Victor Hugo – 92532 Levallois-Perret Cedex.
-
Professional liability insurance ("assurance responsabilité
civile professionnelle");
. the limit of liabilities amounts to EUR 1.5 million,
. the insurance broker is Samcar located 24,
boulevard Princesse Charlotte – 98000 Monaco
. the insurance company is AIG Europe located
Tour AIG – 92079 Paris La Défense Cedex 2.
Other policies have been also subscribed by Namebay.
They mainly concern multi peril insurance and legal employer's liability.
The documentation related to Netbay's policies is
shown in appendix D 13.4.5.
In the near future, if Netbay's registry operator
application is accepted by ICANN, higher limits of liability will be negotiated
with Netbay's insurance broker and companies.
It has to be recalled that Mr. et Mrs. Husson have
an extensive knowledge of the insurance sector being respectively the Chairman
and the Vice Chairman of an insurance brokerage group.
D 13.2. Business plan for the proposed registry
operations. This section should present a comprehensive business plan for
the proposed registry operations. In addition to providing basic information
concerning the viability of the proposed operations, this section offers the
registry operator an opportunity to demonstrate that it has carefully analyzed
the financial and operational aspects of the proposal. At a minimum, factors
that should be addressed are:
The business plan for the proposed registry operations
is included Appendix D13.1.
This appendix has been split into three parts corresponding
to the three demand confidence levels for registry services:
50 M : corresponds to the scenario in which the
actual level of demand has a 50 % probability of being above the level used
in the plan : “M” stands for “medium”;
10 H : corresponds to the scenario in which the
actual level of demand has a 10 % probability of being above the level used
in the plan : “H” stands for “high”;
90 L : corresponds to the scenario in which the
actual level of demand has a 90 % probability of being above the level used
in the plan : “L” stands for “low”.
Each of these scenarios is characterized by a set
of data consistent with the demand level assumption. For example, the staff
and related labor costs have been realistically correlated with the activity
volume of name registration and the expected number of registrars.
D13.2.1.
Services to be provided. A full description of the registry services to be
provided.
Most of Internet users do not have the same perception
of domains as the Internet professionals. For example, for many of them www.domain.com
is a domain, they don't want to care about 3rd level, name serves
and other technical matters. Our aim is to make the use of the DNS simple
for the majority of users without losing the options for the most educated
users. To achieve this goal, the Netbay registry will offer the following
set of services and options :
1.
The
registry database, using Informix, a well known DB-System, containing data
on :
·
Domains
·
Contacts
( holder, admin-c , tech-c )
·
Name
servers
·
Accredited
registrars
·
Accounting
2.
an
email-interface for registrars, allowing them to interact directly with the
registry DB and perform all necessary commands with PGP / GPG signed emails.
3.
An
interface with a specific protocol for registrars as alternative to the email-interface
establishing an SSL connection between registrar and registry
4.
WHOIS
for public allowing everyone to query for information
5.
Bulk
- WHOIS for special purposes with restricted policy for the use
6.
Nameservice
- the registry will operate all necessary tld-nameserves directly to
·
Create
the zone-file from the DB
·
Distribute
the zone-files to the tld-name servers
·
Keep
the TLD-name servers in synchrony
In the first phase it is planned
to run tld-name servers in North America, Asia, Europe
7.
Nameservice
for 3rd and higher level domains ( example www.sld.tld ) . As explained before, many users
require a service which includes that technical detail. This has the additional
advantage of lowering the number of so called lame-delegations.
8.
Operation
of a specialized web-based-search-tool for the public
Together with the registration,
the registrant will be able to categorize himself by answering predefined
questions such as
·
Geographic
area of activities
·
Corporations,
corporation branches, professionals
·
Type
of financial offer or service
·
Language
spoken
·
Individual
statements / comments
·
Place
for pictures, symbols
·
Links
to other web-sides
A web-based search-tool in
7 languages, the 6 official UN languages
·
English
·
French
·
Russian
·
Spanish
·
Arabic
·
Chinese
·
German
( not UN official language )
will be available to the public
for query.
-
The
result will show the matching entries.
-
A
list of already taken domains will be available
9.
Help
desk for registrars (24/7)
·
Domain
name monitoring
10.
Creation
and maintenance of 3rd and higher level domains - thus allowing
independent agents of big corporations to use identifiers related to them
(e.g. agent.corporation.fin)
·
List
of new registered domains but still not activated (30 days rule)
11.
Certificates
of the registering will be sent to the owner by registered letter
12.
Special
protection of data (when important data is changed)
·
Notification
of admin-c by email
·
Notification
of admin-c by fax
·
Request
for confirmation
13.
Clearing
for disputes between
·
Registrars
and registrars
·
Registrants
and registrars
D13.2.2. Revenue model. A full description
of the revenue model, including rates to be charged for various services.
The .fin registry operator has chosen a fee based
revenue model. The assumptions can be summarized in the following table (
scenario 50 M ) :
Price in EUR/Year
|
Source |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
Initial registration |
By registrar |
5,000 |
5,000 |
5,000 |
5,000 |
Renewal |
By registrar |
2,000 |
2,000 |
2,000 |
2,000 |
New 2nd and 3rd
level |
By
registered name |
100 |
100 |
70 |
50 |
Other
Services |
Price in EUR per year |
Weekly Bulk-WHOIS |
10,000 |
Special
protection data |
200 |
The contribution of the other services is difficult
to estimate and has been neglected in the revenue model.
The main source of income will be the fees paid
by registrars for any new domain name registered. In addition to this variable
revenue source, there will be an annual fixed revenue from the registrars'initial
registration fees (EUR 5,000) and a lower renewal fee (EUR 2,000). There will
be a 10 % quality refund for registrars if no significant problem occurred
during the last year of operation.
Other services will be offered for registrars
: most of them will be free or their revenue not taken into account. A more
detailed description will be found in appendix D13.2.12. “ Revenues”
The registry operator 's policy will be to reduce
as much as possible the price of the name registration without jeopardizing
the quality of service provided to the registrars. Consequently, we shall
significantly reduce the name fees but whilst maintaining the same rate of
initial registration fees for any new registrar.
Appendix D13.2.5
D13.2.3. Market. Market definition, size, demand,
accessibility.
There is a need for a new
definition. This definition must be broad enough to take into account the
new convergence of the financial industry especially the numerous overlapping
areas in insurance and banking. This definition must be strict enough to clearly
distinguish the financial community from the commercial world.
Our new definition of the
registrant market will allow new financial intermediaries to be recognized
as members of the .FIN community
The new definition of the
finance communities will encompass the old definition and will offer new intermediaries
such as price comparators, new financial products and sites that deals exclusively
with the financial issues, e-brokers, insurance…
Potential registrars are
the already ICANN certified registrars (operational or about to be operational).
According to the TLD policies only certain registrars offering sufficient
credentials will be accredited as .FIN registrars. They will have to comply
with a set of procedures that will be annually audited by the sponsoring organization.
Financial institutions worldwide are evaluated at least 1 million.
Financial community may be split into 5 main activities: banking, securities
and brokers, insurance, combined real estate in the private sector and regulation
in public sector.
They are currently 128 ICANN
registrars worldwide. With the appearance of new TLD and the filing of currently
operating country code registrars and of the biggest affiliates, we can estimate
the market size to be 250 by the end of 2004.
Financial sites include
online banking, mortgage, insurance and investment sites.
Internet-based financial retailing has been slow to catch on
for many reasons, but now it is expected to develop faster. Online banking
users in the world are estimated at 50 million persons and financial services
users close to 30 million. Both markets should grow by more than 100% in the
next five year.
The market size of financial institutions is 1 million by now
and will be approximately 1.25 million by 2004.
A very prudent benchmark for the market size of third level
names is 1.4 times the market size of financial institutions, i.e. presently
1.4 million and 1.7 million by 2004.
The
growth of the online financial market will lead traditional financial institutions
to develop online services.
.fin
will simplify the research and the knowledge of financial services on the
web.
A new
restricted TLD such as .finance will probably not compete with .com market.
According to our survey,
registrars are likely to join any new program for new TLD delivery. The most
interesting population will be the .com, .net, .org registrars.
The ability of currently
certified ICANN registrants to handle change of ownership upon domain name
with manual checking enables them to do the manual checking requested by .fin
registration. The simplicity of the registration rule will not impact their
current way of doing business. We can expect a large adhesion to .fin registration
process.
See the Business plan data
in appendixes D13.2.5 LMH “Market/Volume/Price”
D13.2.4.
Marketing plan. Advertising, publicity, promotion strategy, advertisement
development strategy, relationship with advertising firm. Use of registrars
and other marketing channels.
Limited to small targeted
professional publications in order to let the registrar community know the
existence of the .fin TLD. Since registrars are well informed of the evolution
of the ICANN policy, it seems not necessary to devote large resources to advertising.
Will be done by registrars
and their affiliates. Being a registry and not a registrar there will be no
publicity to acquire end user clients. Two exceptions to this rule will be
made during the first year. The registry operator will make two road shows.
None
None
None
The registrars will be used
as the main marketing channel; the registry will provide them with some basic
marketing materials to help them deal with the new type of customers.
Business Plan : see appendix
D13.2.4 LMH “Registrars”.
D13.2.5.
Estimated demand for registry services in the new TLD. Projected total demand
for registry services in the TLD, effect of projected registration fees, competition.
Please provide estimates for at least 10%, 50%, and 90% confidence levels.
The table below summarizes
the main hypothesis for the estimation of the expected demand:
In thousand units
|
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
Registrants |
1,000 |
1,069 |
1,147 |
1,234 |
Second
level and third level name |
1,400 |
1,497 |
1,606 |
1,727 |
Market
penetration |
0% |
3,4% |
8,2% |
14,7% |
Estimated demand |
|
50,900 |
131,600 |
254,600 |
We have evaluated the sensitivity
of the scenario to the hypothesis following a Gauss-Laplace law. We assume
that the registration of at least 1,000 new second level domain names in year
4 has a probability of 50%, consequently :
·
the 10% confidence level scenario is 240,000 new registered
names in 2004 (market penetration : 3%).
·
the 90% confidence level scenario is 20,000 new registered
names in 2004 (market penetration : 1%).
N.B.: These assumptions
are linked to the number of expected registrars.
Business Plan : see appendix
D13.2.5 LMH” Market/Volume/Price”
D13.2.6. Resources required to meet demand.
Provide a detailed estimate of all resources (financial, technical, staff,
physical plant, customer service, etc.) required to meet the estimated demands,
using at least the 10%, 50%, and 90% confidence levels.
All the data related to this
section are displayed in appendixes D13.2.6 “Labor resources” and D13.2.8
“Staff”
The following section details
the requirements for the 50 M scenario. It is planned to reduce or increase
resources to adequate levels corresponding to the actual activity volume.
Technical/staff/customer service
1- Software development staff
·
1
day-shift , 4 persons
·
supervision
of test-system
·
programming
and testing
·
2nd
level support
2- Operation staff (Day to day operation of production):
·
3
shifts, 2 persons each, additional 1 for
vacation, sick leave , total of 7 persons
·
monitoring
of production environment
·
frontend,
backend
·
nameservers
·
whois-server
·
special
web-server for search
·
supervising
performance, statistics, updates
·
reporting
and documenting bugs and problems
3- Registrar relation staff (Customer care) :
·
3
shifts, day-shift 2 persons, night-shifts 1 person each, total of 4 persons
·
supervision
of registrar test-phase (each registrar must perform a test before being connected
with the production environment)
·
administrative
tasks related to registrar
·
hot-line
for registrars, 1st level support
4- National membership organizations related staff
(Customer care)
·
1
day-shift , total of 2 persons
·
relation
to membership organizations (a registrant must be member of one)
keeping records, clearing of disputes
5- Administrative staff
A staff of 4 people has been forecast for checking
the electronic copies of registrant documents sent by registrars and other
administrative tasks.
6- Others
One CEO, one CFO and one
assistant to the CEO and the CFO.
Facilities- physical plant (please
see also D15.2.1):
The organization and structure of the dot fin registry
will be distributed over the whole world :
·
administration,
surveillance, hot-line in the offices of Netbay in Monaco
·
test-system
in the offices of CSL in Düsseldorf
·
production
in co-location at a major IP-provider in Europe ( Paris , London or Düsseldorf
)
·
WHOIS
at the same location as production-system
·
WEB-Server
at the same location as production - system
·
NAMESERVER
at major IP-Providers in Europe ( Paris , London or Düsseldorf ), America
( east coast or west coast ), Asia
( Japan or Australia ).
D13.2.7. Plans for acquiring necessary systems
and facilities. Describe plans for acquiring all necessary systems and facilities
for providing the proposed services at each estimated demand level. Provide
details as to the scope, cost, and vendor for any significant planned outsourcing.
·
Standard
software is either already available in CSL or will be bought. Ordering, delivering,
installation is a matter of 4 weeks, total costs EUR K 400.
·
Test
environment double processor with RAID-array mass-storage under Linux and
Informix is already installed and running, total costs EUR K 35.
·
Production
environment, same components but faster, consisting of 2 independent systems
(2 computers each, frontend + backend) each
having all major components twice, expected total cost EUR K 70;
·
3
name servers , similar to production environment but less storage, expected
total cost EUR K 75;
·
WHOIS-server,
similar to name server, 2 independent machines (one as backup), expected costs
EUR K 50
·
1
web-server for specialized queries (see D13.2.1.) similar to production-server,
expected costs EUR K 35;
·
CSL
has already designed, programmed and is now running an similar system, and
has experience with these types of software. Design for these TLD, programming
and test will take 6 months time for 4 people;
·
Negotiations
with connectivity providers for space in their co-locations can be postponed
until 3 months before the start of production. There is a wide variety of
offers available, expected costs for 3 different locations per year EUR K
80. Internet-fr will take care of the selection of connectivity providers.
Appendix D13.2.7a summarizes the software and hardware
investment necessary for implementation of the project as well as the depreciation
rates used for the different types of assets.
Appendix D13.2.7.b details the computation of the
company assets depreciation.
D13.2.8.
Staff size/expansion capability. Plans for obtaining the necessary staff resources,
capacity for expansion, hiring policy, employee training, space for additional
staff, staffing levels needed for provision of expanded technical, support,
escrow, and registry services.
CSL and Internet-fr have proven in
the past their ability to hire good technicians and efficient staff members.
The directors of Netbay with their extensive business experience will actively
contribute to the selection of Netbay staff. Incidentally, some staff members
of CSL and Internet-fr may join Netbay.
Eurafnet and CSL plan to introduce
a stock option plan for the members of the Netbay staff. It must be pointed
out that Eurafnet intends being listed by the end of 2000 in Europe. Netbay
shares held by the staff members could then be exchanged for listed Eurafnet
shares.
Appendix D13.2.8. shows the forecast evolution
of Netbay staff.
For job description please see D13.2.6
Mrs.
Patricia Husson, the Netbay chairman is presently having discussions with
real estate companies in Monaco in order to provide sufficient office space
for Netbay registry operations.
It
has to be recalled that both Internet-fr and CSL presently have available
office space to temporarily host some
Netbay operations( see D13.1.7).
Concerning
escrow service, there will be a daily backup on 2 different tapes at 2 different
locations. Additionally, there will be a weekly backup on CD-ROM which will
be delivered to an escrow-agency in Europe to be selected by the registry
and to be agreed by ICANN (please see D15.2.7).
D13.2.9. Availability of additional management
personnel. How will management needs be filled?
The PACA (Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur) area, near
to the Principality of Monaco, includes several towns such as Sophia – Antipolis,
(the French Silicon Valley) where technical resources are available. Many
highly skilled technicians work in this area which will supply most of the
company staff requirements.
Not all of the people who will be employed by Netbay
have to be specialized in Internet matters: for instance, some members of
the team dedicated to the registrar administration (customer care) only need
to be efficient administrative clerks with good commercial skills.
Note that several employees of Internet-fr and CSL
have already mentioned their intention to apply for a position in the Netbay
joint venture.
D13.2.10.
Term of registry agreement. State assumptions regarding the term of any registry
agreement with ICANN or the sponsoring organization. Note that the .com/.net/.org
registry agreement has a basic term of four years.
Netbay is applying for a basic term of 4 years.
It appears to be the minimum period necessary to amortize the heavy capital
investment needed by the project implementation and the extraordinary start
up costs of a new restricted TLD (foundation of a Sponsoring Organization,
….).
This duration will enable Netbay to progressively
optimize its operating costs and will allow for decreasing registration selling
prices.
D13.2.11. Expected costs associated with the operation
of the proposed registry. Please break down the total estimated operational
costs by the sources of the costs for each estimated demand level. Be sure
to consider the TLD's share of ICANN's cost recovery needs. (See <http://www.icann.org/financials/budget-fy00-01-06jun00.htm#IIIB>.)
Appendix
D.13.2.11 a : Salaries costs (M)
Labor costs presented in appendix D13.2.11.a include
gross salaries earned by the staff and social security costs, calculated with
an average rate of 30%.
Gross salaries have been adjusted to the current
situation on the European labor market.
Appendix
D.13.2.11 b : Sponsoring organization budget (M)
As explained the Sponsoring Organization Proposal,
the costs incurred by the Sponsoring Organization are totally supported by
the registry operator.
Each of the eleven members of the Board will receive
an indemnity of EUR 15,000 per year and will be reimbursed up to EUR 15,000
for their travel and accommodation expenses.
Each year, accredited registrars will be audited
in order to check that all procedures set up by the Sponsoring Organization
and the Registry have been respected, and especially that registrars have
correctly checked that registrants were properly authorized to register their
.FIN domain name. It has been assumed that these expenses will represent EUR
5,000 per registrar and per year.
Legal costs paid by the Sponsoring Organization
are expected to be particularly high in year 1 (EUR 250,000). These legal
expenses correspond to the formation of the sponsoring organization's own
bylaws. For the following years, an average cost of EUR 150,000, then EUR
100,000 has been projected as a provision for the legal treatment of possible
litigations.
Appendix
D.13.2.11 c : Other costs (M)
Marketing costs include the cost of two road shows
during the first two years, in some main financial centers around the world
(NY, Tokyo, London, …), and travels and accommodation for four persons, i.e.
EUR 180,000 in year 1 and EUR 240,000 in year 2.
A fixed allowance of EUR 80,000 has been scheduled
in year 1 as a contribution to ICANN expense compensation. Starting year 2,
Netbay will pay annually a EUR 5 fee per registered name to ICANN.
In addition, a grant of EUR 5 per name will be paid
annually to Mission Enfance, a Monaco humanitarian association for children
( www.mission.enfance.org ).
This contribution will be paid only on a voluntarily basis.
Each registrar will receive a mail ("Registered
mail notification") stating that the name registration process has been
effectively completed. The cost expected for this mailing is EUR 4 per registrar.
Variable operating costs consist mainly of telephone
expenses, office supplies, computers and have been estimated to EUR 2,000
per person.
Other fixed operating costs are mainly made up of
office rent. It has been estimated that an average of EUR 120,000 per year
would adequately cover the rent and other related expenses. It has been assumed
that Netbay will settle from the beginning of year 1 in offices able to host
permanently the whole staff (i.e. 22 persons) during the business plan scope.
Netbay will have to face significant legal costs
in year 1 (EUR 130,000), because it will have to establish all the legal documents
necessary to its activity.
D13.2.12. Expected revenue associated with the operation
of the proposed registry. Please show how expected revenue is computed at
each estimated demand level.
The expected revenue associated
with the operation of the proposed registry is detailed in Appendix D13.2.12«Revenues»
in each scenario (M, H, L).
The volume demand of each
scenario has been derived from the conclusions of D13.2.5.
D13.2.13. Capital requirements. Quantify
capital requirements in amount and timing and describe how the capital will
be obtained. Specify in detail all sources of capital and the cost of that
capital (interest, etc.). Evidence of firm commitment of projected capital
needs will substantially increase the credibility of the registry operator's
proposal.
The capital requirements for each scenario are determined
through three sets of appendixes :
Appendix D13.2.13.a “Sources and Uses of funds“
Appendix D13.2.13.b “Projected Balance sheet structures“
Appendix D13.2.13.c “Projected Balance sheets“
In scenario M, at the beginning of year 1, the share
capital of the Registry Operator is raised to EUR 2,000,000 and additional
funds in the form of current accounts granted by the shareholders to the company
progressively reach an amount of EUR 2,000,000. These current accounts are
reimbursed in year 2 and year 3.
In scenario L, at the beginning of year 1,
the share capital of the Registry Operator is raised to EUR 2,000,000 and
additional funds in the form of current accounts granted by the shareholders
to the company progressively reach an amount of EUR 3,500,000. These current
accounts are reimbursed in year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.
In scenario H, at the beginning of year 1, the share
capital of the Registry Operator is raised to EUR 2,000,000 and additional
funds in the form of current accounts granted by the shareholders to the company
progressively reach an amount of EUR 1,600,000. These current accounts are
reimbursed in year 2.
In all these scenarios, the project is financed
only with shareholders’ funds. No external financing is required.
A letter from one of a Netbay shareholder banker
states that he easily has the capacity to cover with equity funds the capital
needs of the registry project, even in the L scenario (see Appendix D.13.2.13.
d).
D13.2.14. Business risks and opportunities.
Describe upside and downside contingencies you have considered and discuss
your plans for addressing them.
The major parameters of the revenue model are :
-
the
registration selling price
-
the
attractiveness of the .FIN business to the registrars
D13.2.15. Registry failure provisions.
Please describe in detail your plans for dealing with the possibility of registry
failure.
The production system will be hosted by a major
international IP-Provider. Thus we will be using the high standard of security
provisions ( personal , technical ) those companies offer. In the very unlikely
case that the hosting fails, there is the possibility of shifting the production
service to the test-environment within 48 hours. Internet-fr will act as a
consultant to its sister company Netbay to help select with CSL the most suitable
operators.
Regular data escrow and complete description of
content will make it possible to change the registry operator. Contractual
agreements with CORE or other registries will be negotiated to assure mutual
assistance.
D13.3. Pro‑forma financial projections.
Please provide detailed pro‑forma financial projections, consistent
with your business plan, for the demand scenarios that you estimate under
item D13.2.5. The pro‑formas should show revenue and expense estimates
broken down by detailed categories and should be broken down into periods
no longer than quarterly.
Pro-forma financial projections are stated in the
following appendixes :
Appendix
D13.2.14 “ Profit and Loss Accounts“
Appendix
D13.2.13.a “Sources and Uses of funds“
Appendix
D13.2.13.b “Projected Balance sheet structures“
Appendix
D13.2.13.c “Projected Balance sheets“
D13.4. Supporting documentation. The following
documentation should be provided in support of the Business Capabilities and
Plan section :
D13.4.1. Registry operator's organizational documents.
Documents of incorporation (or similar documents).
Appendix 13.4.1 includes
the organizational documents of Netbay and the companies concerned by the
registry project.
D13.4.2. References. A list of significant trade
and credit references.
ICANN is invited to call or write to the following
institutions in order to receive directly credit references of the companies
involved in the project :
Netbay :
Société Générale
Mrs. Montaner
16, Avenue de la Costa MC 98000 Monaco
Tel. +377 93 15 57 27
Eurafnet :
Banque Privée Edmond de Rothschild (Luxembourg)
Mr. Frédéric Otto
20, rue Emmanuel Servais L- 2535 Luxembourg
Tel. +352 47 93 46 620
Fax. +352 47 93 46 640
Commerzbank Düsseldorf
Mr. Hans-Christian Störkel
Tel. +49 211 97108 10
Fax. +49 211 97108 15
BICS
Mr. Olivier Jaeger
1 rue des Canadiens F-91300 Massy
Tel. +33 1 69 20 11 52
Fax. +33 1 69 20 14 85
D13.4.3.
Annual report. The registry operator's most recent annual financial report
(or similar document). Audited financials are preferred.
Documents withdrawn at the
applicant's request.
D13.4.4.
Proof of capital. Provide evidence of existing capital or firm commitments
of capital. Demonstrated access to necessary capital will be carefully scrutinized.
Documents withdrawn at the applicant's request.
D13.4.5. Proof of insurance. Please provide proof
of the insurance described in item D13.1.8.
The documents concerning insurance
policies of Netbay, described in D 13.1.8, are shown in Appendix D13.4.5.
III. TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES AND PLAN
D14.
The third section of the Registry Operator's Proposal is a description of
the registry operator's Technical Capabilities and Plan. This section must
include a comprehensive, professional‑quality technical plan that provides
a detailed description of the registry operator's current technical capabilities
as well as a full description of the operator's proposed technical solution
for establishing and operating all aspects of the registry. The technical
plan will require detailed, specific information regarding the technical capabilities
of the proposed registry. The topics listed below are representative of the
type of subjects that will be covered in the Technical Capabilities and Plan
section of the Registry Operator's Proposal.
[ICANN
will extensively review and analyze this section of the Registry Operator's
Proposal. The content, clarity, and professionalism of this section will be
important factors in ICANN's evaluation of applications. We strongly recommend
that those who are planning to apply secure professional assistance from engineers
and/or other technical consultants to aid in the formulation of the technical
plan and the preparation of the Technical Capabilities and Plan section of
the Registry Operator's Proposal.]
D15. The Technical Capabilities and Plan section should consist
of at least the following:
D15.1. Detailed description of the registry
operator's technical capabilities. This should provide a detailed description
of the registry operator's technical capabilities, including information about
key technical personnel (qualifications and experience), size of technical
workforce, and access to systems development tools. It should also describe
the registry operator's significant past achievements. This description offers
the registry operator an opportunity to demonstrate the extent of its technical
expertise in activities relevant to the operation of the proposed registry.
CSL, the company which will program the system,
already develops and runs the registrar environment for CORE. The system was
originally designed as a registry system. Since CORE was part of the test-bed
phase, the CSL staff now have 1 year's experience in running and tuning the
system. Until now the staff related to the CORE system consisted of 4 people,
highly experienced with TCP/IP, Informix, Linux, Perl and cc, the main tools
used. The hardware system components are high-end RAID-systems.
Netbay which is responsible for the day to
day running of the system, will have a staff of technicians and administrative people who will have received suitable
training.
See also D13.1.4.
D15.2. Technical plan for the proposed
registry operations. This should present a comprehensive technical plan for
the proposed registry operations. In addition to providing basic information
concerning the operator's proposed technical solution (with appropriate diagrams),
this section offers the registry operator an opportunity to demonstrate that
it has carefully analyzed the technical requirements of registry operation.
Factors that should be addressed in the technical plan include:
D15.2.1. General description of proposed
facilities and systems. Address all locations of systems. Provide diagrams
of all of the systems operating at each location. Address the specific types
of systems being used, their capacity, and their interoperability, general
availability, and level of security. Describe in detail buildings, hardware,
software systems, environmental equipment, Internet connectivity, etc.
In the first phase the system will consist of:
·
Development
and Test environment located at CSL
·
Production
system co-located at the facilities of a major connectivity provider
·
3
Name servers co-located at the facilities of major connectivity providers
in:
·
Asia
·
Europe
·
USA
·
1
Web-Server for a specialized search co-located at a major connectivity provider.
Statistics of the usage will show when and where
the equipment must be enlarged.
See also D13.2.7 where type of hardware and
software are given.
The production system will be located at worldwide
acting upstream-providers like COLT , Worldcom and similar. Minimum Bandwidth
of 155 Mbit / sec. (except the Test system which has 34 Mbit / sec ). The
usual high level of security, backup and power supply those companies offer.
All systems will be fully redundant (with RAID-Arrays
and daily backups). In addition the test system can replace the production
system within 48 hours.
24/7 surveillance with an reaction time of max.1
hour for the production system.
Incremental update of WHOIS in 15 min interval.
Zone creation and distribution every 12 hours.
The Web-Server will be updated once a day.
Basically the scheme is as follows :
Administration, surveillance,
hot-line Monaco Testsystem Düsseldorf Production
system At
the location of an IP-Provider frontend
+ backend ( Paris , London or Düsseldorf )
WEB-server Special search in 7 languages At the location of an IP-Provider (
Paris , London or Düsseldorf ) WHOIS At
the location of an IP-Provider (
Paris , London or Düsseldorf )
NS
1 - Europe At
the location of an IP-Provider (
Paris , London or Düsseldorf )
NS
2 - Asia At the location of an IP-Provider (
Japan or Australia )
NS
3 - USA At the location of an IP-Provider (
east or west coast )
D15.2.2. Registry‑registrar model
and protocol. Please describe in detail.
Registrars have direct access to the Registry Data
Base. No manual interaction at registry-level is normally needed. CSL implemented
the SRS protocol of CORE which was made public as an internet-draft in November
1998 (Appendix D 15.2.2). This protocol will be used as basis (contractual
arrangements between CSL and CORE allows CSL to use it). Changes will enhance
the system to reflect the day to day experience.
Registrars create, modify and
delete objects they "own" (maintainer)
Objects :
·
Domain
·
Contact
( holder , admin-c , tech-c )
·
Name
server ( Hosts )
Notification:
Any creation or change ( incl.
deletion ) of an object will cause the registrar and the related person to
be notified by email. Important actions like deletion / transfer of a domain
will need an ACK from the holder.
Transfers :
Domains can be transferred
between registrars. The fact that all data is kept at registry-level, avoids
unauthorized changes of the contacts. Transfers will be charged without increasing
the lifetime of a domain.
The template for initiating
a transfer will be presented at the registry web-site. After entering the
necessary date and then submitting, a pdf-file (or similar) will be sent to
the applicant (by web and/or email). This document must be signed and sent
by regular mail to the registry in order to activate the transfer. Registrars
will be notified about the process so they can act accordingly.
Holder change:
Similar to transfers, the old
and new holder will have to submit documents prepared by the registry web-site
to the registry. Learning from the experience in com - net - org control of
transfers and holder changes will be at the registry level, no longer at registrar
level.
Renewal :
Registration period will be
1 year, renewal always for 1 further year. Requesting a renewal every year
helps to keep the database up to date. The registrar must take care of the
renewal. If 4 weeks before the renewal-date domain is not renewed or deleted,
the holder will be notified by email. If the domain is still not deleted or
renewed by the renewal-date, admin-c will be notified by email and the domain
extended by a period grace of 4 weeks. During that time nameservice will be
suspended, thus giving a user an additional indication.
Communication between registry
and registrar :
PGP / GPG signed emails and/or
SSL connection.
Special tools and procedures
to synchronize the data-base of registry and registrar
Startup :
Round Robin
Details explained in E 12
D15.2.3. Database capabilities. Database
size, throughput, scalability, procedures for object creation, editing, and
deletion, change notifications, registrar transfer procedures, grace period
implementation, reporting capabilities, etc.
The database used is Informix. Useful capabilities
such as integrity check, page lock, mirroring are enabled. A throughput of
1 registration/request per sec for at least 8 out of 24 hours per day has
already been tested and can be assured. Because of the queue-mechanism of
the requests, minor outages at the production-system will not affect the performance.
D15.2.4. Zone file
generation. Procedures for
changes, editing by registrars, updates. Address frequency, security, process,
interface, user authentication, logging, data back‑up.
Objects are created and maintained by the registrars
in a data-base-environment with the usual security and logging mechanism.
The zone-file for the name server will be created and distributed every 12
hours. 3 cycles of old versions are kept for emergency recovery at the name
server location, the old versions of at least one month will be kept on tape
at the registry.
D15.2.5. Zone file distribution and publication.
Locations of name servers, procedures for and means of distributing zone files
to them.
All name servers will be under control of the registry.
Transfer of zone-files by scp (secure copy).
Watchdog procedures will be used to monitor the
name servers (performance and usage).
Locations of name servers not yet finally decided,
but according D15.2.1. they will be
distributed across 3 continents ( America , Asia, Europe )
D15.2.6. Billing and collection systems.
Technical characteristics, system security, accessibility.
Prepayment will be enforced. Accredited Registrars
will have to credit an account on the system to be able to register domains.
Payment will be accepted by
·
credit
card (together with a signed fax), crediting within working day
·
bank
transfer (with a signed fax announcing the amount), crediting after credited
at the registry-bank.
·
Registrar
will be able to define a minimum balance of his account at which he will be
notified by email
D15.2.7. Data escrow and backup. Frequency
and procedures for backup of data. Describe hardware and systems used, data
format, identity of escrow agents, procedures for retrieval of data/rebuild
of database, etc.
It should be noted that the system will use RAID-Storage
with full redundancy. Additionally there will be:
·
daily
backup on 2 tapes (one copy at the location of the production environment,
2nd at the programming side)
·
weekly
backup on CD, to be used as escrow at an appropriate deposit
Recovery-procedure will be tested at random.
D15.2.8. Publicly accessible look up/WHOIS
service. Address software and hardware, connection speed, search capabilities,
coordination with other WHOIS systems, etc.
WHOIS-server will be updated every 15 minutes. Usual
data will be shown in a machine- and human- readable format. A web-interface
for the WHOIS-server will be available. Reduction of reaction time for series
of queries from same ip, will be considered, although not yet decided.
An important additional web-based service will be
offered :
·
when
registering a domain, the registrant has the opportunity to define factors
describing his services.
·
Users
will be able to use these arguments to search for registrants that match.
See also D13.2.1. for details.
D15.2.9. System security. Technical and
physical capabilities and procedures to prevent system hacks, break‑ins,
data tampering, and other disruptions to operations. Physical security.
The system architecture provides highest possible
security. There are basically 2 separate computer systems:
·
Frontend
which is known to community, with normal IP-address, which only accepts the
requests and sends messages, the interface to the registrars. The Frontend
( B ) is easily scalable by adding additional equipment (B2, B3 etc.)
·
Backend
which is isolated in an inner network, not accessible from outside, which
does the processing and keeps the data (database)
Physical and technical security is granted by the
subcontractors providing co-location.
A Backend DataBase
Internal network
(not accessible
from world)
B1 Frontend Gateway B2 Frontend Gateway
External network
R§ Registrar R1 Registrar R2 Registrar
Worldwide-known
D15.2.10. Peak capacities. Technical
capability for handling a larger‑than‑projected demand for registration
or load. Effects on load on servers, databases, back‑up systems, support
systems, escrow systems, maintenance, personnel.
The various stages of the registration process and
other tasks are interconnected by queues. Failure of one component or process
does not harm, but only slow down the overall performance. Requests are not
lost, but queued for processing after recovery.
The initial system is designed to accept a minimum
work load of 1 registration/request per sec.
D15.2.11. System reliability. Define,
analyze, and quantify quality of service.
·
Name
servers : the presence of at least 3 independent systems at 3 different locations
( Asia, Europe, USA ) at locations of well known connectivity providers will
assure the highest possible reliability (reaction time 1 hour).
·
WHOIS
: 2 systems will be available, one for backup (reaction time 1 hour).
·
Production-server
: 2 systems (2 backend , 2 frontend) will be available, both with the main
components redundant, one for backup (reaction time 1 hour).
·
Web-server
for queries : 1 system with main components redundant (reaction time 1 hour)
·
7/24
systems surveillance and alarm system for 2nd level support.
D15.2.12. System outage prevention. Procedures
for problem detection, redundancy of all systems, back up power supply, facility
security, technical security, availability of back up software, operating
system, and hardware, system monitoring, technical maintenance staff, server
locations.
The major components of the production-system are
redundant ( RAID mass-storage, double-processors etc.)
Daily backup on 2 Tapes (one at co-location, another
at programming side) allows fast recovery in case of severe data-loss.
The co-location facilities of the connection providers
have the usual high standard of outage prevention, automatic fire-extinction,
alternative power supply , security etc.
D15.2.13. System recovery procedures.
Procedures for restoring the system to operation in the event of a system
outage, both expected and unexpected. Identify redundant/diverse systems for
providing service in the event of an outage and describe the process for recovery
from various types of failures, the training of technical staff who will perform
these tasks, the availability and backup of software and operating systems
needed to restore the system to operation, the availability of the hardware
needed to restore and run the system, backup electrical power systems, the
projected time for restoring the system, the procedures for testing the process
of restoring the system to operation in the event of an outage, the documentation
kept on system outages and on potential system problems that could result
in outages.
·
Using
environments with dual-processors, RAID-Systems and principal components redundant
allows partially automatic recovery. Assumed recovery time max. 2 hours.
·
In
the rare case of failure of a machine without the possibility to access the
RAID-array, recovery can be carried out from the daily backup-tape on the
2nd environment at the same side. Assumed recovery time : 8 hours.
·
In
the very rare case of sabotage or equivalent damage of the location the 2nd
copy of the daily backup-tape or the weekly escrow-disk can be used to initially
run the production on the test-environment. Assumed recovery time : 24-48
hours.
·
Details
of the recovery-procedure to be defined (which includes the already available
backup-procedures from the data-base software), recovery-procedure will be
tested at random.
·
Physical
security (access , electrical power etc) provided by major IP-connectivity
providers.
D15.2.14. Technical and other support.
Support for registrars and for Internet users and registrants. Describe technical
help systems, personnel accessibility, web‑based, telephone and other
support, support services to be offered, time availability of support, and
language‑availability of support.
·
Registrars
will be supported by
·
Email
·
Telephone
·
dispute
resolutions between
·
registrar
and registrar
·
registrant
and registrar
will be available at registry
level
In the initial phase the following languages will
be supported
·
English
·
French
·
German
The registry-registrar agreement will have provisions
that the registrar has to provide support for registrants.
D15.3
Subcontractors. If you intend to subcontract any the following:
•
all of the registry operation function;
•
any portion of the registry function
accounting for 10% or more of overall costs of the registry function; or
•
any portion of any of the following
parts of the registry function accounting for 25% or more of overall
costs of the part: database operation, zone file generation, zone file
distribution and publication, billing
and collection, data
escrow and backup, and WHOIS service please
(a) identify the subcontractor;
(b) state the scope and terms of the
subcontract; and
(c) attach a comprehensive technical
proposal from the subcontractor that describes its technical plans and
capabilities in a manner similar to that of the Technical Capabilities and Plan
section of the Registry Operator's Proposal. In addition, subcontractor
proposals should include full information on the subcontractor's technical,
financial, and management capabilities and resources.
The connectivity providers for the co-locations
are not yet determined.
The deposit for the data-escrow has not been
decided yet.
Programming and testing will be carried out by:
CSL GmbH.
Rathausufer 16
D-40213 Düsseldorf
Internet-fr will provide consulting for
connectivity and selection of hosting providers.
Internet-fr
2-12, Chemin de Femmes Massy F-91300
By signing this Registry Operator's Proposal, the
undersigned certifies (a) that he or she has authority to do so on behalf of
the registry operator and, on his or her own behalf and on behalf of the
registry operator, (b) that all information contained in this proposal, and all
documents attached to this proposal, is true and accurate to the best of
his/her/its knowledge and information. The undersigned and the registry
operator understand that any material misstatement or misrepresentation will
reflect negatively on any application of which this proposal is a part and may
cause cancellation of any delegation of a top‑level domain based on such
an application.
_______________________________
Signature
_______________________________
Name (please print)
PATRICIA HUSSON
_______________________________
Title
CHAIRMAN
_______________________________
Name of Registry Operator
NETBAY
_______________________________
Date
30/09/2000
_______________________________ _______________________________
Signature Signature
_______________________________ _______________________________
Name (please
print) Name
(please print)
PATRICIA HUSSON SIEGFRIED
LANGENBACH
_______________________________ _______________________________
Title Title
CHAIRMAN CHAIRMAN
_______________________________ _______________________________
Name of
Shareholder Name
of Shareholder
EURAFNET SA CSL GmbH
_______________________________ _______________________________
Date Date
30/09/2000 30/09/2000
(c) 2000 The Internet Corporation for Assigned
Names and Numbers
All rights
reserved.
Updated August 15, 2000