Registry Operator's Proposal
 
 
 
[A Registry Operator's 
    Proposal is to be submitted as part of every new TLD application. In case 
    of applications for unsponsored TLDs, the registry operator will be the applicant 
    and should prepare and submit the proposal as part of the application. In 
    the case of applications for sponsored TLDs, the sponsoring organization (or, 
    where the sponsoring organization has not yet been formed, organization(s) 
    or person(s) proposing to form the sponsoring organization) will be the applicant. 
    The sponsoring organization should select the proposed registry operator, 
    have it prepare the Registry Operator's Proposal, and submit it as part of 
    the application.
 
Please place the legend 
    "CONFIDENTIAL" on any part of your description that you have listed 
    in item F3.1 of your Statement of Requested Confidential Treatment of Materials 
    Submitted.
 
The Registry Operator's 
    Proposal should be separately bound (if more than one volume, please sequentially 
    number them) and labeled: "Registry Operator's Proposal." and must 
    cover all topics described below. This page, signed on behalf of the registry 
    operator, should be included at the front of the Registry Operator's Proposal.]
 
 
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
 
 
 
Eurafnet is the Luxembourg holding company of an 
    Internet group which owns 100 % of
Internet-fr SA and SAM Namebay. Eurafnet is controlled 
    by Mrs Patricia Husson, a Monaco citizen, the other shareholders being Mr 
    Marco Rinaudo and Mr Domenico Surace, both Italian citizens.
 
Internet-fr is a French company founded in 1995 
    . Based In Massy near Paris, it has a significant expertise in the field of 
    critical web hosting. Its two managing directors are Marco Rinaudo and Domenico 
    Surace.
 
Namebay is a Monaco based company which has specialized in 
    domain name registration. It is one of the CORE founder (#18) and is a fully 
    operational ICANN accredited registrar for .com, .net and .org. This firm 
    is managed by Mrs Patricia Husson.
 
CSL is a Düsseldorf based ISP company founded in 
    1977. It is owned and managed by Mr Siegfried Langenbach and started offering 
    Internet services in 1994. It is one of the CORE founder (#11). It is used 
    to run large database-applications. CSL developed a registry-software for 
    CORE also known as SRS (shared registry system) when CORE became one of the 
    5 test-bed-registrars with ICANN.
 
Netbay is a Monaco company founded in 1997 which 
    shares are owned by Mr and Mrs Husson. Formerly, one of its activities was 
    domain name registration. This registrar activity was transferred to Namebay 
    in July 1999, and its other remaining activity (Electronic Document Management 
    Systems) has been recently shifted into a Sophia Antipolis company belonging 
    to Mrs Husson.
 
Mrs Patricia Husson and Mr Siegfried Langenbach 
    who both share similar views on the Internet development have decided to apply 
    jointly for the dot fin domain name registry.
 
To implement their project, they plan to use 
    the existing Netbay company as a joint 
    venture company.
 
In October 2000, several operations will be 
    conducted:
 
            Netbay 
    equity capital will be increased from EUR 228,000 to EUR 2,000,000. The new 
    shares will be subscribed by Eurafnet, Mrs Husson, Mr Langenbach and CSL;
 
The shareholder ownership will 
    be then as follows: on one hand, 51 % for Eurafnet and Mrs. Husson, on the 
    other hand, 49 % for Mr. Langenbach and CSL;
 
            In addition, Netbay will receive from its shareholders additional 
    EUR 2,500,000 in cash in current account and cash commitments. Netbay shareholders 
    have the capability to bring in the company new equity funds ( in the form 
    of capital and current accounts payments) up to EUR 10 million, if the 50 
    % level of confidence revenue schedule is not matched in time and if needed 
    for the development of the project.
 
            Mr. Siegfried Langenbach will be appointed 
    as a director and vice president;
 
            CSL 
    GmbH will be appointed as a director;
 
Netbay is sure that the appraisal of its application 
    has to take into account  the combined 
    human, technical and financial resources of the Eurafnet Group, CSL and their 
    shareholders.
 
 
D1. The first section 
    of the Registry Operator's Proposal (after the signed copy of this page) should 
    be a listing of the following information about the registry operator. Please 
    key your responses to the designators (D1, D2, D3, etc.) below.
 
 
D2. 
    The full legal name, principal address, telephone and fax numbers, and e‑mail 
    address of the registry operator.
 
Full legal name : SAM NETBAY
Principal address : 24, boulevard Princesse Charlotte 
    - MC 98000 MONACO
Telephone number : +377 97 97 21 21
Fax number : +377 97 97 21 22
e-mail address : ph@netbayregistry.net
 
 
 
 
 
 
D3. 
    The addresses and telephone and fax numbers of all other business locations 
    of the registry operator.
 
Technical services : CSL GmbH
Address : Rathausufer 16 , 40213 Düsseldorf Germany
Telephone number : +49 211 867670
Fax number : +49 211 8676710
e-mail address : sl@netbayregistry.net
 
Administration :
Address : 24 Boulevard Princesse Charlotte 
    MC 98000 MONACO
Telephone number : +377 97 97 21
Fax number : +377 97 97 21 22
e-mail address : md@netbayregistry.net
 
 
D4. 
    The registry operator's type of business entity (e.g., corporation, partnership, 
    etc.) and law (e.g., Denmark) under which it is organized.
 
Type of business entity         : Société Anonyme Monégasque (SAM)
Law                                         
    : monégasque (Monaco)
 
 
D5. 
    URL of registry operator's principal world wide web site.
 
netbayregistry.net or www.netbayregistry.net
 
 
D6. 
    Dun & Bradstreet D‑U‑N‑S Number (if any) of registry 
    operator.
 
SIC code (APE) : 737 
 
 
D7. 
    Number of employees.
 
Not applicable since Netbay is a new joint 
    venture dedicated to the dot fin registry project.
Netbay presently employs only one person, 
    but the staff of the mother companies groups amounts to 50 persons. Netbay 
    staff will be increased according to its Business Plan specifications described 
    in D13.2.
 
 
D8. 
    Registry operator's total revenue (in US dollars) in the last‑ended 
    fiscal year.
 
Not applicable for the reasons stated in D0 
    and in D7. However, 1999 revenues for CSL and Internet-fr are respectively 
    EUR 3,000,000 and EUR 1,300,000.
2000 expected revenues amount to EUR 10,000,000 
    for CSL and EUR 3,000,000 for Internet-fr.
 
D9. 
    Full names and positions of (i) all directors, (ii) all officers, (iii) all 
    relevant managers, and (iv) any persons or entities owning five percent or 
    more of registry operator.
Directors 
    :
 
Patricia Husson ( Chairman) 
Siegfried Langenbach (to be appointed in October- 
    Vice Chairman)
Robert Husson
Mathieu Dierstein
Marco Rinaudo (to be appointed in October)
Domenico Surace (to be appointed in October)
CSL (to be appointed in October)
 
 
Officers and relevant managers have not been yet 
    appointed (see D0).
 
CSL and Internet-fr have proven in the past their 
    ability to hire good technicians and efficient staff members. The directors 
    of Netbay with their extensive business experience will actively contribute 
    to the selection of Netbay staff. Incidentally, some staff members of CSL 
    and Internet-fr will join Netbay. 
 
Shareholders:
 
see D0
 
D10. 
    Name, telephone and fax number, and e‑mail address of person to contact 
    for additional information regarding this proposal. If there are multiple 
    people, please list all their names, telephone and fax numbers, and e‑mail 
    addresses and describe the areas as to which each should be contacted.
 
Business 
    / Financial :
Mathieu Dierstein
Eurafnet (director)
+33 609 774 360
md@netbayregistry.net
 
Software 
    / Protocol / Database :
Siegfried Langenbach
+49 211 86767 0
sl@netbayregistry.net
 
Thomas Serval
Savoirweb.com sarl (consultant)
+33 662 624 908
 
 
 
 
Legal 
    (USA):
David Maher
Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal
+1 312 876 8055
 
Legal 
    (Monaco and USA):
David Manasse
Attorney at Law NY Bar
+377 93 50 29 21
 
 
D11. 
    The full legal name, principal address, telephone and fax numbers, e‑mail 
    address, and Dun & Bradstreet D‑U‑N‑S Number (if any) 
    of all subcontractors identified in item D15.3 below.
 
Address: Rathausufer 16, D-40213 Düsseldorf
D&B Number:
Telephone number: +49 211 867670
Fax number: +49 211 8676710
e-mail address: info@nrw.net
 
Address:2-12, Chemin des Femmes Massy F-91300 
    
D&B Number:
Telephone number: +33 (0)1 64 53 12 12 
Fax number: +33 (0)1 64 53 12 19 
e-mail address : info@internet-fr.net
 
 
II. BUSINESS CAPABILITIES AND PLAN
 
 
D12. 
    The second section of the Registry Operator's Proposal (after the "General 
    Information" section) is a description of the registry operator's Business 
    Capabilities and Plan. This section must include a comprehensive, professional‑quality 
    business plan that provides detailed, verified business and financial information 
    about the registry operator. The topics listed below are representative of 
    the type of subjects that will be covered in the Business Capabilities and 
    Plan section of the Registry Operator's Proposal.
 
[ 
    ICANN will extensively review and analyze this section of the Registry Operator's 
    Proposal. The content, clarity, and professionalism of this section will be 
    important factors in ICANN's evaluation of applications. We strongly recommend 
    securing professional assistance from financial and management consultants 
    to aid in the formulation of your business plan, in securing the necessary 
    sources of financing, and in preparation of this section.]
 
 
D13. The Business Capabilities and Plan section should consist 
    of at least the following:
 
 
D13.1. Detailed description of the registry 
    operator's capabilities. This should describe general capabilities and activities. 
    This description also offers the registry operator an opportunity to demonstrate 
    the extent of its business and managerial expertise in activities relevant 
    to the operation of the proposed registry. The following items should, at 
    a bare minimum, be covered :
 
The Eurafnet group and CSL together through 
    Netbay are forming the suitable team for the dot fin registry management.
 
They have the capacity to devote the right 
    internet technical staff with proven experience in registry / registrar environments 
    for the implementation of their project. They benefit from the seniority and 
    successful experience in finance and insurance related sectors of some of 
    the team members.
 
They bring their full backing to Netbay and 
    they are ready to support the project with the necessary financial resources.
 
Netbay ‘s project is supported by active members 
    of the finance community. It has the capability to demonstrate that the dot 
    fin registry will help the Internet community by allowing the old economy 
    entities as well as the newcomers in the financial sector to improve their 
    offer.
 
 
D13.1.1. 
    Company information. Date of formation, legal status, primary location, size 
    of staff, formal alliances, references, corporate or other structure, ownership 
    structure.
 
See Appendix D 13.1.1 "LEGAL 
    ORGANIZATION CHART"
 
 
 
 
Date of formation :                05 05 1997
Legal status :                         
    Existing company under the laws of Monaco
Primary location :                  24 Boulevard Princesse Charlotte MC 98000 Monaco
Size of staff :                          
    1 (see D0 and D7)
Formal alliances :                  With CSL and Internet-fr (see D 15.3)
References :                          Société 
    Générale (bank) 16, Avenue de la Costa MC 98000 Monaco
Corporate structure : SAM (Société Anonyme Monégasque) with a Board of Directors
Ownership 
    structure :            Eurafnet and Mrs. 
    Husson (51%); Mr. Siegfried Langenbach and CSL( 49%)
 
 
Date of formation :                08 06 1977
Legal status :                         
    Existing company under the laws of Germany
Primary location :                  Rathausufer 16, D-40213 Düsseldorf
Size of staff :                          
    18 (see D0 and D7)
Formal alliances :                  With Netbay (see D 15.3)
References :                          Commerzbank Düsseldorf 
    ( Germany )
Corporate structure : GmbH (equivalent to Ltd.)
Ownership structure :            Mr. Siegfried Langenbach ( 100%)
 
Internet-fr
 
Date of formation : 05 10 1995
Legal status :                         Existing company under 
    the laws of France
Primary location :                  2-12, Chemin des Femmes Massy F-91300 
Size of staff :                          
    25 (see D0)
Formal alliances :                  With Netbay (see D 15.3) and Namebay
References :                          BICS (bank) in Massy 
    France
Corporate structure : SA (société anonyme) with a Board of Directors 
    
Ownership structure :            Eurafnet (100%)
 
Eurafnet
 
Date of formation : 17 12 1999
Legal status :                         Existing company under 
    the laws of Luxembourg 
Primary location :                  16, rue Emmanuel Servais L- 2535 Luxembourg
Size of staff :                          
    0 (see D0)
Formal alliances :                  Holding company of Internet-fr and Namebay
References :                          Banque Privée Edmond 
    de Rothschild (Luxembourg)
Corporate structure : SA (société anonyme) with a Board of Directors
Ownership 
    structure :            Mrs. Patricia 
    Husson (52%); PAAR SA (48%), this company being owned equally by Mr. Marco 
    Rinaudo and Mr. Domenico Surace
 
Date of formation :                29 06 1999
Legal status :                         
    Existing company under the laws of Monaco
Primary location :                  24 Boulevard Princesse Charlotte MC 98000 Monaco
Size of staff :                          
    2 (see D0)
Formal alliances :                  With Internet-fr
References : Société Générale (bank) 16, Avenue de la Costa MC 98000 Monaco
Corporate structure :             SAM (Société Anonyme Monégasque) 
    with a Board of Directors
Ownership structure :            Eurafnet (100%)
 
 
D13.1.2. 
    Current business operations. Core capabilities, services offered, products 
    offered, duration of provision of services and products.
 
Internet-fr offers two main types of service 
    to its corporate customers mainly in France:
 
            Critical 
    web hosting (shared and co-located servers);
            Leased 
    lines for IP access.
 
Internet-fr is:
 
            Active 
    member of AFNIC( dot fr TLD)
            Local 
    registry for RIPE
            ISO 
    9001 
Microsoft Certified Solution 
    Provider
WAS (Web Attached Storage) 
    certified by AUSPEX
Internet-fr benefits from numerous 
    peering agreements with, for example, BULL, Abovenet, COLT, Globix, Carrier1, 
    Level 3, PSINet, Belgacom,…
 
CSL is ISP (Internet Service Provider) 
    for companies only (no individual customers), restricted to the region of 
    Nordrhein Westfalen = nrw (in revenue the biggest of the16 states of Germany, 
    18 million inhabitants)
CSL provides additionally services in Database applications 
    and statistical analysis.
 
From the list of customers to be mentioned:
·        
    Henkel
·        
    Ferrero
·        
    VDI 
    ( German association of engineers )
·        
    Weight 
    Watchers
·        
    Madakom 
    ( Standardization  association for 
    retailers in Germany )
·        
    Detekom 
    ( consultant company of Deutsche Telekom )
·        
    Ericsson
·        
    E-plus 
    ( 3rd GSM provider in Germany )
·        
    Stadtwerke 
    Düsseldorf ( civil services of town )
·        
    Ricoh
·        
    Grey
·        
    Last 
    not least CORE ( Internet Council of Registrars )
 
 
D13.1.3. Past business operations/entity 
    history. History, date of formation, legal status/type of entity, initial 
    services, duration of provision of services and products.
 
Founded in 1972, the company was transformed in 
    a GmbH in 1977, originally providing statistical analysis for market research 
    companies and departments. Database services were added in 1990, Internet 
    services in 1994.
 
CSL is used to run large database-applications 
    as examples:
 
On-line database for Weight Watchers in Germany, 
    1 million members with behavior.
 
For Madakom, a standardization body for manufacturers 
    and retailers, collecting 1 million records per week from 200 outlets of barcode-marked 
    products for statistical analysis. Online data for 2 years (= 104 weeks).
 
For Detekom, a Deutsche Telekom owned company, a 
    survey on 500,000 employees and former employees before the split of Deutsche 
    Telekom's predecessor.
 
CSL programmed and actually runs the registrar environment 
    for CORE ( Internet Council of Registrars ). CORE was chosen by ICANN as one 
    of 5 test-bed registrars back in April 1999. Originally, CORE intended to 
    run a registry for some TLDs. A software called SRS ( shared registry system 
    ) was developed to handle them. When CORE become a registrar, the software 
    was modified, thereby allowing CORE members to use it as a gateway to the 
    NSI registry. Almost 1 million domains were registered and maintained by SRS. 
    Unlike the software run by NSI as registry, this is a so called heavy-registry-software, 
    having almost all data stored at the registry level, making it easier for 
    the registrars.
 
Siegfried Langenbach was a cofounder and the first 
    head of the Supervisory Board of DENIC, the German registry, which is the 
    2nd largest registry in the world after NSI.
 
Recognized as an expert, CSL is working together 
    with the EU commission to define the technical aspects of a TLD for the EU.
 
 
Internet-fr has built up a large customer 
    base including well known organizations and companies, such as :
 
Vivendi, 
    Century 21, Argus de la Presse, Green Peace, UNICEF,
St Gobain Emballages, MAN, Virgin Cola, Geophysique, 
    Oberthur, Cilas (CEA/Matra), Dassault Systems,Lufthansa,
Jean-Paul Gaultier, Kenzo, Salvatore Ferragamo, Christian Lacroix,
OCDE, INSEE, FIANET (Axa group), Abeille Assurances,…
 
 
D13.1.4. 
    Registry/database/Internet related experience and activities. Experience with 
    database operation, Internet service provision.
 
CSL is already acting in the registry 
    / registrar operation field.
 
Since beginning of the test-bed for com-net-org 
    domains, CORE has registered almost 1 million names at NSI-Registry using 
    the technology, infrastructure and software developed by CSL.
 
Recognized as an expert, CSL is working together 
    with the EU commission to define the technical aspects of a TLD for the EU. 
    The same is valid for CORE.
 
With the CORE-project, CSL proved that it was able 
    to run a reliable registry with a significant number of registrations ( almost 
    1 million in the first year ). One of CSL s’ aim is to help and train people 
    of developing countries to build their own registry.
 
Internet-fr 
    and its management 
    team have accumulated significant 
    experience in database management and connectivity. It has developed the software 
    used by its sister company Namebay (a registrar) which enables it to communicate 
    under good conditions with NSI Registry.
 
Since 1995, Internet-fr has hosted several large 
    data bases for major companies in its Massy data center. It is able to optimize 
    and secure the data flows concerning these data bases. Internet-fr monitors 
    the data bases and, when necessary, implements special procedures to ensure 
    the best response from the data bases. It is a specialist in data base clustering.
 
Internet-fr has developed its IP backbone, 
    giving it an international operator status.
 
 
 
 
 
 
D13.1.5. Mission. The registry operator's 
    mission and how it relates to expansion into the registry operation field.
 
The registry operator mission is to provide the 
    financial community with a clearly identified distinctive top level domain 
    name that will encompass the new fields of finance and represents the old 
    economy financial institutions.
It will act independently of any registrars 
    by not providing registrar services itself and thus improving competition 
    and fairness in the registration services.
 It will 
    maintain internet stability through the sponsoring organization that will 
    deal with typical financial industry problems.
It will enhance the DNS by avoiding confusion between 
    commercial and financial activities and thereby improving the trust of the 
    internet community into the DNS.
It will extend the diversity of the DNS.
It will use the appropriate protection of rights 
    through its dispute resolution policy.
 
The owners of Netbay (ultimately its major shareholders 
    Mrs. Husson and Mr. Langenbach) have contacts in Africa and Latin America. 
    If possible, they will assist the staff of the countries on these continents 
    to become experienced in running a registry and improve, when necessary, the 
    related functions in their countries. 
 
 
D13.1.6. Management. 
    Qualifications 
    and experience of financial and business officers and other relevant employees. 
    Please address/include past experience, resumes, references, biographies.
 
Siegfried 
    Langenbach (55) has an engineering degree in electronics. 
    Before becoming independent, he worked for UNIVAC, a Sperry Corporation 
    company.
Either he or his company is member of :
RIPE NCC;
DENIC, the organization that runs the .de domain 
    (with over 2 million domains registered); Siegfried was the first Chair of 
    the Oversight Board;
CORE;
Participant in IETF;
Member of the ISPCP (Internet Service Provider constituency 
    of DNSO, ICANN)
Former member of MAC, ICANN's Member Advisory Committee.
 
Marco Rinaudo (28), Chairman of Internet-fr 
    SA graduated from Universita degli Studi di Pisa and Orsay University (Paris 
    XI) – Masters degree in Computer Science (1994). He is one of the founders 
    of Internet-fr. After graduating, he worked for BULL on the implementation 
    of the Paris Subway IP network.
 
Domenico Surace (27), CEO of Internet-fr SA, graduated 
    from Universita degli Studi di Pisa and Orsay University(Paris XI) – Masters 
    degree in Computer Science (1994). He is one of the founders of Internet-fr. 
    After graduating, he worked also for BULL on the implementation of the Paris 
    Subway IP network.
 
Patricia 
    Husson, Chairman 
    of the Eurafnet Group, has long standing experience in the insurance sector. 
    She was the owner of the largest French insurance brokerage house which was 
    sold in 1992 to Marsh and Mc Lennan, the world's largest insurance broker. 
    Today, she operates a brokerage insurance group established in Monaco. Since 
    1996, she has made successful investments in high tech companies.
 
Mathieu Dierstein (58), 
    CFO of the Eurafnet Group, has a PHD in Mathematics (Agrégation - 1967) and 
    graduated from Columbia University (Finance- Honors) in 1973. He held numerous 
    positions in industrial companies such as Roussel Uclaf (HMR) and Valeo. He 
    has been a member of the Executive Committee of Banque Vernes in Paris in 
    charge of its M&A Department.
 
 
D13.1.7. 
    Staff/employees. Current staff size, demonstrated ability to expand employee 
    base, hiring policy, employee training, space for additional staff.
 
Altogether, CSL and the Eurafnet employ almost 50 
    qualified technicians.
 
Since Netbay is a joint venture, the relevant staff 
    still have to be appointed for the registry project (see D0, D9 and D13.2.8).
 
CSL employs 18 persons with extensive 
    experience in database-technology and domain-related issues such as name service, 
    WHOIS, web, etc.
 
Being a small company, people join CSL because of 
    personal recommendations and their desire to take part in new and interesting 
    tasks.
 
Typically, the same remarks can be expressed for 
    Eurafnet staff with a headcount of 25.
 
Internet-fr has recently rented additional office 
    and technical space in Massy and in Paris (totaling approx 700 m2)
 
CSL has considerable space available in its 
    Düsseldorf offices.
 
Concerning Netbay and its future expanded 
    administrative facilities, the actions required to secure the necessary office 
    space are in progress (see 13.2.8).
 
 
D13.1.8. 
    Commercial general liability insurance. Address/include amount of insurance 
    policy, provider of policy, plans for obtaining additional insurance.
 
Netbay has subscribed several insurance policies 
    covering its business activities.
 
The most important ones concern :
 
-         
    Premises and operations liability insurance ("assurance 
    responsabilité exploitation");
 
.    the limit of liabilities amounts to EUR 4.5 million,
.    the insurance broker is Samcar located 24, 
    boulevard Princesse Charlotte – 98000 Monaco
.     the insurance company is Albingia located 
    109-111, rue Victor Hugo – 92532 Levallois-Perret Cedex.
 
-         
    Professional liability insurance ("assurance responsabilité 
    civile professionnelle");
 
.    the limit of liabilities amounts to EUR 1.5 million,
.    the insurance broker is Samcar located 24, 
    boulevard Princesse Charlotte – 98000 Monaco
.    the insurance company is AIG Europe located 
    Tour AIG – 92079 Paris La Défense Cedex 2.
 
Other policies have been also subscribed by Namebay. 
    They mainly concern multi peril insurance and legal employer's liability.
 
The documentation related to Netbay's policies is 
    shown in appendix D 13.4.5.
 
In the near future, if Netbay's registry operator 
    application is accepted by ICANN, higher limits of liability will be negotiated 
    with Netbay's insurance broker and companies.
 
It has to be recalled that Mr. et Mrs. Husson have 
    an extensive knowledge of the insurance sector being respectively the Chairman 
    and the Vice Chairman of an insurance brokerage group.
 
 
D 13.2. Business plan for the proposed registry 
    operations. This section should present a comprehensive business plan for 
    the proposed registry operations. In addition to providing basic information 
    concerning the viability of the proposed operations, this section offers the 
    registry operator an opportunity to demonstrate that it has carefully analyzed 
    the financial and operational aspects of the proposal. At a minimum, factors 
    that should be addressed are:
 
The business plan for the proposed registry operations 
    is included Appendix D13.1.
 
This appendix has been split into three parts corresponding 
    to the three demand confidence levels for registry services:
 
50 M : corresponds to the scenario in which the 
    actual level of demand has a 50 % probability of being above the level used 
    in the plan : “M” stands for “medium”;
 
10 H : corresponds to the scenario in which the 
    actual level of demand has a 10 % probability of being above the level used 
    in the plan : “H” stands for “high”;
90 L : corresponds to the scenario in which the 
    actual level of demand has a 90 % probability of being above the level used 
    in the plan : “L” stands for “low”.
 
Each of these scenarios is characterized by a set 
    of data consistent with the demand level assumption. For example, the staff 
    and related labor costs have been realistically correlated with the activity 
    volume of name registration and the expected number of registrars.
 
 
D13.2.1. 
    Services to be provided. A full description of the registry services to be 
    provided.
 
Most of Internet users do not have the same perception 
    of domains as the Internet professionals. For example, for many of them www.domain.com 
    is a domain, they don't want to care about 3rd level, name serves 
    and other technical matters. Our aim is to make the use of the DNS simple 
    for the majority of users without losing the options for the most educated 
    users. To achieve this goal, the Netbay registry will offer the following 
    set of services and options :
 
1.      
    The 
    registry database, using Informix, a well known DB-System, containing data 
    on : 
·        
    Domains
·        
    Contacts 
    ( holder, admin-c , tech-c )
·        
    Name 
    servers
·        
    Accredited 
    registrars
·        
    Accounting
2.      
    an 
    email-interface for registrars, allowing them to interact directly with the 
    registry DB and perform all necessary commands with PGP / GPG signed emails.
3.      
    An 
    interface with a specific protocol for registrars as alternative to the email-interface 
    establishing an SSL connection between registrar and registry
4.      
    WHOIS 
    for public allowing everyone to query for information
5.      
    Bulk 
    - WHOIS for special purposes with restricted policy for the use
6.      
    Nameservice 
    - the registry will operate all necessary tld-nameserves directly to
·        
    Create 
    the zone-file from the DB
·        
    Distribute 
    the zone-files to the tld-name servers
·        
    Keep 
    the TLD-name servers in synchrony
In the first phase it is planned 
    to run tld-name servers in North America, Asia, Europe
7.      
    Nameservice 
    for 3rd and higher level domains ( example www.sld.tld ) . As explained before, many users 
    require a service which includes that technical detail. This has the additional 
    advantage of lowering the number of so called lame-delegations.
8.      
    Operation 
    of a specialized web-based-search-tool for the public
Together with the registration, 
    the registrant will be able to categorize himself by answering predefined 
    questions such as
·        
    Geographic 
    area of activities
·        
    Corporations, 
    corporation branches, professionals
·        
    Type 
    of financial offer or service
·        
    Language 
    spoken
·        
    Individual 
    statements / comments
·        
    Place 
    for pictures, symbols
·        
    Links 
    to other web-sides
A web-based search-tool in 
    7 languages, the 6 official UN languages 
·        
    English
·        
    French
·        
    Russian
·        
    Spanish
·        
    Arabic
·        
    Chinese
·        
    German 
    ( not UN official language )
will be available to the public 
    for query. 
-         
    The 
    result will show the matching entries.
-         
    A 
    list of already taken domains will be available
9.      
    Help 
    desk for registrars (24/7)
·        
    Domain 
    name monitoring
10. 
    Creation 
    and maintenance of 3rd and higher level domains - thus allowing 
    independent agents of big corporations to use identifiers related to them 
    (e.g. agent.corporation.fin)
·        
    List 
    of new registered domains but still not activated (30 days rule)
11. 
    Certificates 
    of the registering will be sent to the owner by registered letter
12. 
    Special 
    protection of data (when important data is changed)
·        
    Notification 
    of admin-c by email 
·        
    Notification 
    of admin-c by fax
·        
    Request 
    for confirmation
13. 
    Clearing 
    for disputes between
·        
    Registrars 
    and registrars
·        
    Registrants 
    and registrars
 
 
D13.2.2. Revenue model. A full description 
    of the revenue model, including rates to be charged for various services.
 
The .fin registry operator has chosen a fee based 
    revenue model. The assumptions can be summarized in the following table ( 
    scenario 50 M ) :
 
Price in EUR/Year
|   | Source | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 
| Initial registration | By registrar | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 
| Renewal | By registrar | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 
| New 2nd and 3rd 
          level | By 
          registered name | 100 | 100 | 70 | 50 | 
 
 
 
| Other 
          Services | Price in EUR per year | 
|  Weekly Bulk-WHOIS | 10,000 | 
| Special 
          protection data | 200 | 
 
The contribution of the other services is difficult 
    to estimate and has been neglected in the revenue model.
 
The main source of income will be the fees paid 
    by registrars for any new domain name registered. In addition to this variable 
    revenue source, there will be an annual fixed revenue from the registrars'initial 
    registration fees (EUR 5,000) and a lower renewal fee (EUR 2,000). There will 
    be a 10 % quality refund for registrars if no significant problem occurred 
    during the last year of operation.
 
Other services will be offered for registrars 
    : most of them will be free or their revenue not taken into account. A more 
    detailed description will be found in appendix D13.2.12. “ Revenues”
 
The registry operator 's policy will be to reduce 
    as much as possible the price of the name registration without jeopardizing 
    the quality of service provided to the registrars. Consequently, we shall 
    significantly reduce the name fees but whilst maintaining the same rate of 
    initial registration fees for any new registrar.
 
Appendix D13.2.5
 
 
D13.2.3. Market. Market definition, size, demand, 
    accessibility.
 
 
There is a need for a new 
    definition. This definition must be broad enough to take into account the 
    new convergence of the financial industry especially the numerous overlapping 
    areas in insurance and banking. This definition must be strict enough to clearly 
    distinguish the financial community from the commercial world. 
Our new definition of the 
    registrant market will allow new financial intermediaries to be recognized 
    as members of the .FIN community
The new definition of the 
    finance communities will encompass the old definition and will offer new intermediaries 
    such as price comparators, new financial products and sites that deals exclusively  
    with the financial issues, e-brokers, insurance…
 
Potential registrars are 
    the already ICANN certified registrars (operational or about to be operational). 
    According to the TLD policies only certain registrars offering sufficient 
    credentials will be accredited as .FIN registrars. They will have to comply 
    with a set of procedures that will be annually audited by the sponsoring organization.
 
Financial institutions worldwide are evaluated at least 1 million. 
    Financial community may be split into 5 main activities: banking, securities 
    and brokers, insurance, combined real estate in the private sector and regulation 
    in public sector. 
 
They are currently 128 ICANN 
    registrars worldwide. With the appearance of new TLD and the filing of currently 
    operating country code registrars and of the biggest affiliates, we can estimate 
    the market size to be 250 by the end of 2004. 
 
Financial sites include 
    online banking, mortgage, insurance and investment sites. 
Internet-based financial retailing has been slow to catch on 
    for many reasons, but now it is expected to develop faster. Online banking 
    users in the world are estimated at 50 million persons and financial services 
    users close to 30 million. Both markets should grow by more than 100% in the 
    next five year.
 
The market size of financial institutions is 1 million by now 
    and will be approximately 1.25 million by 2004.
A very prudent benchmark for the market size of third level 
    names is 1.4 times the market size of financial institutions, i.e. presently 
    1.4 million and 1.7 million by 2004.
The 
    growth of the online financial market will lead traditional financial institutions 
    to develop online services. 
.fin 
    will simplify the research and the knowledge of financial services on the 
    web. 
A new 
    restricted TLD such as .finance will probably not compete with .com market.
 
According to our survey, 
    registrars are likely to join any new program for new TLD delivery. The most 
    interesting population will be the .com, .net, .org registrars.
The ability of currently 
    certified ICANN registrants to handle change of ownership upon domain name 
    with manual checking enables them to do the manual checking requested by .fin 
    registration. The simplicity of the registration rule will not impact their 
    current way of doing business. We can expect a large adhesion to .fin registration 
    process.
 
See the Business plan data 
    in appendixes D13.2.5 LMH “Market/Volume/Price”
 
 
 
 
D13.2.4. 
    Marketing plan. Advertising, publicity, promotion strategy, advertisement 
    development strategy, relationship with advertising firm. Use of registrars 
    and other marketing channels.
 
Limited to small targeted 
    professional publications in order to let the registrar community know the 
    existence of the .fin TLD. Since registrars are well informed of the evolution 
    of the ICANN policy, it seems not necessary to devote large resources to advertising.
Will be done by registrars 
    and their affiliates. Being a registry and not a registrar there will be no 
    publicity to acquire end user clients. Two exceptions to this rule will be 
    made during the first year. The registry operator will make two road shows.
None
None
None
The registrars will be used 
    as the main marketing channel; the registry will provide them with some basic 
    marketing materials to help them deal with the new type of customers.
 
Business Plan : see appendix 
    D13.2.4 LMH “Registrars”.
 
 
D13.2.5. 
    Estimated demand for registry services in the new TLD. Projected total demand 
    for registry services in the TLD, effect of projected registration fees, competition. 
    Please provide estimates for at least 10%, 50%, and 90% confidence levels.
 
 
The table below summarizes 
    the main hypothesis for the estimation of the expected demand: 
 
In thousand units
|   | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 
| Registrants | 1,000 | 1,069 | 1,147 | 1,234 | 
| Second 
          level and third level name | 1,400 | 1,497 | 1,606 | 1,727 | 
| Market 
          penetration | 0% | 3,4% | 8,2% | 14,7% | 
| Estimated demand  |   | 50,900 | 131,600 | 254,600 | 
 
 
We have evaluated the sensitivity 
    of the scenario to the hypothesis following a Gauss-Laplace law. We assume 
    that the registration of at least 1,000 new second level domain names in year 
    4 has a probability of 50%, consequently : 
·        
    the 10% confidence level scenario is 240,000 new registered 
    names in 2004 (market penetration : 3%).
·        
    the 90% confidence level scenario is 20,000 new registered 
    names in 2004 (market penetration : 1%).
 
N.B.: These assumptions 
    are linked to the number of expected registrars.
 
Business Plan : see appendix 
    D13.2.5 LMH” Market/Volume/Price”
 
 
D13.2.6. Resources required to meet demand. 
    Provide a detailed estimate of all resources (financial, technical, staff, 
    physical plant, customer service, etc.) required to meet the estimated demands, 
    using at least the 10%, 50%, and 90% confidence levels.
 
All the data related to this 
    section are displayed in appendixes D13.2.6 “Labor resources” and D13.2.8 
    “Staff”
 
The following section details 
    the requirements for the 50 M scenario. It is planned to reduce or increase 
    resources to adequate levels corresponding to the actual activity volume.
 
Technical/staff/customer service
 
1- Software development staff
·        
    1 
    day-shift , 4 persons
·        
    supervision 
    of test-system
·        
    programming 
    and testing
·        
    2nd 
    level support
 
2- Operation staff (Day to day operation of production): 
    
·        
    3 
    shifts, 2 persons each, additional 1 for  
    vacation, sick leave , total of 7 persons
·        
    monitoring 
    of production environment
·        
    frontend, 
    backend
·        
    nameservers
·        
    whois-server
·        
    special 
    web-server for search
·        
    supervising 
    performance, statistics, updates
·        
    reporting 
    and documenting bugs and problems
 
 
3- Registrar relation staff (Customer care) :
·        
    3 
    shifts, day-shift 2 persons, night-shifts 1 person each, total of 4 persons
·        
    supervision 
    of registrar test-phase (each registrar must perform a test before being connected 
    with the production environment)
·        
    administrative 
    tasks related to registrar
·        
    hot-line 
    for registrars, 1st level support
 
4- National membership organizations related staff 
    (Customer care)
·        
    1 
    day-shift , total of 2 persons
·        
    relation 
    to membership organizations (a registrant must be member of one)
keeping records, clearing of disputes 
 
5- Administrative staff 
 
A staff of 4 people has been forecast for checking 
    the electronic copies of registrant documents sent by registrars and other 
    administrative tasks.
 
6- Others
 
One CEO, one CFO and one 
    assistant to the CEO and the CFO.
 
Facilities- physical plant (please 
    see also D15.2.1):
 
The organization and structure of the dot fin registry 
    will be distributed over the whole world :
·        
    administration, 
    surveillance, hot-line in the offices of Netbay in Monaco 
·        
    test-system 
    in the offices of CSL in Düsseldorf
·        
    production 
    in co-location at a major IP-provider in Europe ( Paris , London or Düsseldorf 
    )
·        
    WHOIS 
    at the same location as production-system
·        
    WEB-Server 
    at the same location as production - system
·        
    NAMESERVER 
    at major IP-Providers in Europe ( Paris , London or Düsseldorf ), America 
    ( east coast  or west coast ), Asia 
    ( Japan or Australia ).
 
 
D13.2.7. Plans for acquiring necessary systems 
    and facilities. Describe plans for acquiring all necessary systems and facilities 
    for providing the proposed services at each estimated demand level. Provide 
    details as to the scope, cost, and vendor for any significant planned outsourcing.
 
·        
    Standard 
    software is either already available in CSL or will be bought. Ordering, delivering, 
    installation is a matter of 4 weeks, total costs EUR K 400.
·        
    Test 
    environment double processor with RAID-array mass-storage under Linux and 
    Informix is already installed and running, total costs EUR K 35. 
·        
    Production 
    environment, same components but faster, consisting of 2 independent systems 
    (2 computers each, frontend + backend)  each 
    having all major components twice, expected total cost EUR K 70;
·        
    3 
    name servers , similar to production environment but less storage, expected 
    total cost EUR K 75;
·        
    WHOIS-server, 
    similar to name server, 2 independent machines (one as backup), expected costs 
    EUR K 50
·        
    1 
    web-server for specialized queries (see D13.2.1.) similar to production-server, 
    expected costs EUR K 35;
·        
    CSL 
    has already designed, programmed and is now running an similar system, and 
    has experience with these types of software. Design for these TLD, programming 
    and test will take 6 months time for 4 people;
·        
    Negotiations 
    with connectivity providers for space in their co-locations can be postponed 
    until 3 months before the start of production. There is a wide variety of 
    offers available, expected costs for 3 different locations per year EUR K 
    80. Internet-fr will take care of the selection of connectivity providers.
 
Appendix D13.2.7a summarizes the software and hardware 
    investment necessary for implementation of the project as well as the depreciation 
    rates used for the different types of assets.
 
Appendix D13.2.7.b details the computation of the 
    company assets depreciation.
 
 
D13.2.8. 
    Staff size/expansion capability. Plans for obtaining the necessary staff resources, 
    capacity for expansion, hiring policy, employee training, space for additional 
    staff, staffing levels needed for provision of expanded technical, support, 
    escrow, and registry services.
 
            CSL and Internet-fr have proven in 
    the past their ability to hire good technicians and efficient staff members. 
    The directors of Netbay with their extensive business experience will actively 
    contribute to the selection of Netbay staff. Incidentally, some staff members 
    of CSL and Internet-fr may join Netbay.
 
            Eurafnet and CSL plan to introduce 
    a stock option plan for the members of the Netbay staff. It must be pointed 
    out that Eurafnet intends being listed by the end of 2000 in Europe. Netbay 
    shares held by the staff members could then be exchanged for listed Eurafnet 
    shares.
 
Appendix D13.2.8. shows the forecast evolution 
    of Netbay staff.
For job description please see D13.2.6
 
            Mrs. 
    Patricia Husson, the Netbay chairman is presently having discussions with 
    real estate companies in Monaco in order to provide sufficient office space 
    for Netbay registry operations.
 
            It 
    has to be recalled that both Internet-fr and CSL presently have available 
    office space  to temporarily host some 
    Netbay operations( see D13.1.7).
            Concerning 
    escrow service, there will be a daily backup on 2 different tapes at 2 different 
    locations. Additionally, there will be a weekly backup on CD-ROM which will 
    be delivered to an escrow-agency in Europe to be selected by the registry 
    and to be agreed by ICANN (please see D15.2.7).
 
 
D13.2.9. Availability of additional management 
    personnel. How will management needs be filled?
 
The PACA (Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur) area, near 
    to the Principality of Monaco, includes several towns such as Sophia – Antipolis, 
    (the French Silicon Valley) where technical resources are available. Many 
    highly skilled technicians work in this area which will supply most of the 
    company staff requirements.
 
Not all of the people who will be employed by Netbay 
    have to be specialized in Internet matters: for instance, some members of 
    the team dedicated to the registrar administration (customer care) only need 
    to be efficient administrative clerks with good commercial skills.
 
Note that several employees of Internet-fr and CSL 
    have already mentioned their intention to apply for a position in the Netbay 
    joint venture.
 
 
D13.2.10. 
    Term of registry agreement. State assumptions regarding the term of any registry 
    agreement with ICANN or the sponsoring organization. Note that the .com/.net/.org 
    registry agreement has a basic term of four years.
 
Netbay is applying for a basic term of 4 years. 
    It appears to be the minimum period necessary to amortize the heavy capital 
    investment needed by the project implementation and the extraordinary start 
    up costs of a new restricted TLD (foundation of a Sponsoring Organization, 
    ….).
 
This duration will enable Netbay to progressively 
    optimize its operating costs and will allow for decreasing registration selling 
    prices.
 
 
D13.2.11. Expected costs associated with the operation 
    of the proposed registry. Please break down the total estimated operational 
    costs by the sources of the costs for each estimated demand level. Be sure 
    to consider the TLD's share of ICANN's cost recovery needs. (See <http://www.icann.org/financials/budget-fy00-01-06jun00.htm#IIIB>.)
 
Appendix 
    D.13.2.11 a : Salaries costs (M)
 
Labor costs presented in appendix D13.2.11.a include 
    gross salaries earned by the staff and social security costs, calculated with 
    an average rate of 30%.
 
 
Gross salaries have been adjusted to the current 
    situation on the European labor market.
 
Appendix 
    D.13.2.11 b : Sponsoring organization budget (M)
 
As explained the Sponsoring Organization Proposal, 
    the costs incurred by the Sponsoring Organization are totally supported by 
    the registry operator.
 
Each of the eleven members of the Board will receive 
    an indemnity of EUR 15,000 per year and will be reimbursed up to EUR 15,000 
    for their travel and accommodation expenses. 
 
Each year, accredited registrars will be audited 
    in order to check that all procedures set up by the Sponsoring Organization 
    and the Registry have been respected, and especially that registrars have 
    correctly checked that registrants were properly authorized to register their 
    .FIN domain name. It has been assumed that these expenses will represent EUR 
    5,000 per registrar and per year.
 
Legal costs paid by the Sponsoring Organization 
    are expected to be particularly high in year 1 (EUR 250,000). These legal 
    expenses correspond to the formation of the sponsoring organization's own 
    bylaws. For the following years, an average cost of EUR 150,000, then EUR 
    100,000 has been projected as a provision for the legal treatment of possible 
    litigations.
 
Appendix 
    D.13.2.11 c : Other costs (M)
 
Marketing costs include the cost of two road shows 
    during the first two years, in some main financial centers around the world 
    (NY, Tokyo, London, …), and travels and accommodation for four persons, i.e. 
    EUR 180,000 in year 1 and EUR 240,000 in year 2.
 
A fixed allowance of EUR 80,000 has been scheduled 
    in year 1 as a contribution to ICANN expense compensation. Starting year 2, 
    Netbay will pay annually a EUR 5 fee per registered name to ICANN.
 
In addition, a grant of EUR 5 per name will be paid 
    annually to Mission Enfance, a Monaco humanitarian association for children 
    ( www.mission.enfance.org ). 
    This contribution will be paid only on a voluntarily basis.
 
Each registrar will receive a mail ("Registered 
    mail notification") stating that the name registration process has been 
    effectively completed. The cost expected for this mailing is EUR 4 per registrar.
 
Variable operating costs consist mainly of telephone 
    expenses, office supplies, computers and have been estimated to EUR 2,000 
    per person.
 
Other fixed operating costs are mainly made up of 
    office rent. It has been estimated that an average of EUR 120,000 per year 
    would adequately cover the rent and other related expenses. It has been assumed 
    that Netbay will settle from the beginning of year 1 in offices able to host 
    permanently the whole staff (i.e. 22 persons) during the business plan scope. 
 
Netbay will have to face significant legal costs 
    in year 1 (EUR 130,000), because it will have to establish all the legal documents 
    necessary to its activity. 
 
 
D13.2.12. Expected revenue associated with the operation 
    of the proposed registry. Please show how expected revenue is computed at 
    each estimated demand level.
 
The expected revenue associated 
    with the operation of the proposed registry is detailed in Appendix D13.2.12«Revenues» 
    in each scenario (M, H, L).
 
The volume demand of each 
    scenario has been derived from the conclusions of D13.2.5.
 
 
D13.2.13. Capital requirements. Quantify 
    capital requirements in amount and timing and describe how the capital will 
    be obtained. Specify in detail all sources of capital and the cost of that 
    capital (interest, etc.). Evidence of firm commitment of projected capital 
    needs will substantially increase the credibility of the registry operator's 
    proposal.
 
The capital requirements for each scenario are determined 
    through three sets of appendixes : 
 
Appendix D13.2.13.a “Sources and Uses of funds“
 
Appendix D13.2.13.b “Projected Balance sheet structures“
 
Appendix D13.2.13.c “Projected Balance sheets“
 
In scenario M, at the beginning of year 1, the share 
    capital of the Registry Operator is raised to EUR 2,000,000 and additional 
    funds in the form of current accounts granted by the shareholders to the company 
    progressively reach an amount of EUR 2,000,000. These current accounts are 
    reimbursed in year 2 and year 3. 
 
In scenario L, at the beginning of year 1, 
    the share capital of the Registry Operator is raised to EUR 2,000,000 and 
    additional funds in the form of current accounts granted by the shareholders 
    to the company progressively reach an amount of EUR 3,500,000. These current 
    accounts are reimbursed in year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5. 
 
 
In scenario H, at the beginning of year 1, the share 
    capital of the Registry Operator is raised to EUR 2,000,000 and additional 
    funds in the form of current accounts granted by the shareholders to the company 
    progressively reach an amount of EUR 1,600,000. These current accounts are 
    reimbursed in year 2. 
 
In all these scenarios, the project is financed 
    only with shareholders’ funds. No external financing is required.
 
A letter from one of a Netbay shareholder banker 
    states that he easily has the capacity to cover with equity funds the capital 
    needs of the registry project, even in the L scenario (see Appendix D.13.2.13. 
    d).
 
 
D13.2.14. Business risks and opportunities. 
    Describe upside and downside contingencies you have considered and discuss 
    your plans for addressing them.
 
The major parameters of the revenue model are :
-         
    the 
    registration selling price
-         
    the 
    attractiveness of the .FIN business to the registrars
 
 
 
D13.2.15. Registry failure provisions. 
    Please describe in detail your plans for dealing with the possibility of registry 
    failure.
 
The production system will be hosted by a major 
    international IP-Provider. Thus we will be using the high standard of security 
    provisions ( personal , technical ) those companies offer. In the very unlikely 
    case that the hosting fails, there is the possibility of shifting the production 
    service to the test-environment within 48 hours. Internet-fr will act as a 
    consultant to its sister company Netbay to help select with CSL the most suitable 
    operators.
 
Regular data escrow and complete description of 
    content will make it possible to change the registry operator. Contractual 
    agreements with CORE or other registries will be negotiated to assure mutual 
    assistance. 
 
 
D13.3. Pro‑forma financial projections. 
    Please provide detailed pro‑forma financial projections, consistent 
    with your business plan, for the demand scenarios that you estimate under 
    item D13.2.5. The pro‑formas should show revenue and expense estimates 
    broken down by detailed categories and should be broken down into periods 
    no longer than quarterly.
 
Pro-forma financial projections are stated in the 
    following appendixes : 
 
 
Appendix 
    D13.2.14 “ Profit and Loss Accounts“
 
Appendix 
    D13.2.13.a “Sources and Uses of funds“
 
Appendix 
    D13.2.13.b “Projected Balance sheet structures“
 
Appendix 
    D13.2.13.c “Projected Balance sheets“
 
 
D13.4. Supporting documentation. The following 
    documentation should be provided in support of the Business Capabilities and 
    Plan section :
 
 
D13.4.1. Registry operator's organizational documents. 
    Documents of incorporation (or similar documents).
 
Appendix 13.4.1 includes 
    the organizational documents of Netbay and the companies concerned by the 
    registry project.
 
 
D13.4.2. References. A list of significant trade 
    and credit references.
 
ICANN is invited to call or write to the following 
    institutions in order to receive directly credit references of the companies 
    involved in the project :
 
Netbay : 
 
Société Générale
Mrs. Montaner
16, Avenue de la Costa MC 98000 Monaco
Tel. +377 93 15 57 27
 
 
Eurafnet :
 
Banque Privée Edmond de Rothschild (Luxembourg) 
    
Mr. Frédéric Otto 
20, rue Emmanuel Servais L- 2535 Luxembourg
Tel. +352 47 93 46 620
Fax. +352 47 93 46 640 
 
 
Commerzbank Düsseldorf
Mr. Hans-Christian Störkel
Tel. +49 211 97108 10
Fax. +49 211 97108 15
 
 
 
BICS 
Mr. Olivier Jaeger
1 rue des Canadiens F-91300 Massy
Tel. +33 1 69 20 11 52
Fax. +33 1 69 20 14 85
 
 
D13.4.3. 
    Annual report. The registry operator's most recent annual financial report 
    (or similar document). Audited financials are preferred.
Documents withdrawn at the 
    applicant's request.
D13.4.4. 
    Proof of capital. Provide evidence of existing capital or firm commitments 
    of capital. Demonstrated access to necessary capital will be carefully scrutinized.
Documents withdrawn at the applicant's request.
 
D13.4.5. Proof of insurance. Please provide proof 
    of the insurance described in item D13.1.8.
 
The documents concerning insurance 
    policies of Netbay, described in D 13.1.8, are shown in Appendix D13.4.5.
 
 
III. TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES AND PLAN
 
D14. 
    The third section of the Registry Operator's Proposal is a description of 
    the registry operator's Technical Capabilities and Plan. This section must 
    include a comprehensive, professional‑quality technical plan that provides 
    a detailed description of the registry operator's current technical capabilities 
    as well as a full description of the operator's proposed technical solution 
    for establishing and operating all aspects of the registry. The technical 
    plan will require detailed, specific information regarding the technical capabilities 
    of the proposed registry. The topics listed below are representative of the 
    type of subjects that will be covered in the Technical Capabilities and Plan 
    section of the Registry Operator's Proposal.
 
[ICANN 
    will extensively review and analyze this section of the Registry Operator's 
    Proposal. The content, clarity, and professionalism of this section will be 
    important factors in ICANN's evaluation of applications. We strongly recommend 
    that those who are planning to apply secure professional assistance from engineers 
    and/or other technical consultants to aid in the formulation of the technical 
    plan and the preparation of the Technical Capabilities and Plan section of 
    the Registry Operator's Proposal.]
 
 
D15. The Technical Capabilities and Plan section should consist 
    of at least the following:
 
 
D15.1. Detailed description of the registry 
    operator's technical capabilities. This should provide a detailed description 
    of the registry operator's technical capabilities, including information about 
    key technical personnel (qualifications and experience), size of technical 
    workforce, and access to systems development tools. It should also describe 
    the registry operator's significant past achievements. This description offers 
    the registry operator an opportunity to demonstrate the extent of its technical 
    expertise in activities relevant to the operation of the proposed registry.
 
CSL, the company which will program the system, 
    already develops and runs the registrar environment for CORE. The system was 
    originally designed as a registry system. Since CORE was part of the test-bed 
    phase, the CSL staff now have 1 year's experience in running and tuning the 
    system. Until now the staff related to the CORE system consisted of 4 people, 
    highly experienced with TCP/IP, Informix, Linux, Perl and cc, the main tools 
    used. The hardware system components are high-end RAID-systems.
 
Netbay which is responsible for the day to 
    day running of the system, will have a staff of  technicians and administrative people who will have received suitable 
    training. 
 
See also D13.1.4.
 
 
D15.2. Technical plan for the proposed 
    registry operations. This should present a comprehensive technical plan for 
    the proposed registry operations. In addition to providing basic information 
    concerning the operator's proposed technical solution (with appropriate diagrams), 
    this section offers the registry operator an opportunity to demonstrate that 
    it has carefully analyzed the technical requirements of registry operation. 
    Factors that should be addressed in the technical plan include:
 
 
D15.2.1. General description of proposed 
    facilities and systems. Address all locations of systems. Provide diagrams 
    of all of the systems operating at each location. Address the specific types 
    of systems being used, their capacity, and their interoperability, general 
    availability, and level of security. Describe in detail buildings, hardware, 
    software systems, environmental equipment, Internet connectivity, etc.
 
 
In the first phase the system will consist of:
 
·        
    Development 
    and Test environment located at CSL
·        
    Production 
    system co-located at the facilities of a major connectivity provider
·        
    3 
    Name servers co-located at the facilities of major connectivity providers 
    in:
 
·        
    Asia
·        
    Europe
·        
    USA
·        
    1 
    Web-Server for a specialized search co-located at a major connectivity provider.
 
Statistics of the usage will show when and where 
    the equipment must be enlarged.
See also D13.2.7 where type of hardware and 
    software are given.
The production system will be located at worldwide 
    acting upstream-providers like COLT , Worldcom and similar. Minimum Bandwidth 
    of 155 Mbit / sec. (except the Test system which has 34 Mbit / sec ). The 
    usual high level of security, backup and power supply those companies offer.
All systems will be fully redundant (with RAID-Arrays 
    and daily backups). In addition the test system can replace the production 
    system within 48 hours.
 
24/7 surveillance with an reaction time of max.1 
    hour for the production system.
 
Incremental update of WHOIS in 15 min interval.
 
Zone creation and distribution every 12 hours.
 
The Web-Server will be updated once a day.
Basically the scheme is as follows :
 
 
   
   Administration, surveillance, 
                  hot-line Monaco Testsystem Düsseldorf Production 
                  system At 
                  the location of an IP-Provider frontend 
                  + backend ( Paris , London or Düsseldorf )
    
    
       
    
       
       
       
       
       
      
       
    
        
         
      
          
          
             
         
               
          
        
         
    
          
          
             
         
               
           
       
    
       
       
        
         
    
          
          
             
         
               
           
       
  
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   WEB-server Special search in 7 languages At the location of an IP-Provider ( 
                  Paris , London or Düsseldorf ) WHOIS   At 
                  the location of an IP-Provider ( 
                  Paris , London or Düsseldorf )
    
    
       
    
       
       
       
      
       
  
        
         
      
          
          
             
         
               
          
        
         
    
          
          
             
         
               
          
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   NS 
                  1 - Europe   At 
                  the location of an IP-Provider ( 
                  Paris , London or Düsseldorf )
    
    
       
    
      
       
  
        
         
    
          
          
             
         
               
          
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   NS 
                  2  - Asia   At the location of an IP-Provider ( 
                  Japan or Australia )
    
    
       
    
      
       
  
        
         
    
          
          
             
         
               
          
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   NS 
                  3  - USA   At the location of an IP-Provider ( 
                  east or west coast )
    
    
       
    
      
       
  
        
         
    
          
          
             
         
               
          
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
D15.2.2. Registry‑registrar model 
    and protocol. Please describe in detail.
 
Registrars have direct access to the Registry Data 
    Base. No manual interaction at registry-level is normally needed. CSL implemented 
    the SRS protocol of CORE which was made public as an internet-draft in November 
    1998 (Appendix D 15.2.2). This protocol will be used as basis (contractual 
    arrangements between CSL and CORE allows CSL to use it). Changes will enhance 
    the system to reflect the day to day experience.
 
Registrars create, modify and 
    delete objects they "own" (maintainer)
Objects :
·        
    Domain
·        
    Contact 
    ( holder , admin-c , tech-c )
·        
    Name 
    server ( Hosts )
 
Notification: 
Any creation or change ( incl. 
    deletion ) of an object will cause the registrar and the related person to 
    be notified by email. Important actions like deletion / transfer of a domain 
    will need an ACK from the holder.
 
Transfers :
Domains can be transferred 
    between registrars. The fact that all data is kept at registry-level, avoids 
    unauthorized changes of the contacts. Transfers will be charged without increasing 
    the lifetime of a domain.
The template for initiating 
    a transfer will be presented at the registry web-site. After entering the 
    necessary date and then submitting, a pdf-file (or similar) will be sent to 
    the applicant (by web and/or email). This document must be signed and sent 
    by regular mail to the registry in order to activate the transfer. Registrars 
    will be notified about the process so they can act accordingly.
 
Holder change: 
Similar to transfers, the old 
    and new holder will have to submit documents prepared by the registry web-site 
    to the registry. Learning from the experience in com - net - org control of 
    transfers and holder changes will be at the registry level, no longer at registrar 
    level.
 
Renewal :
Registration period will be 
    1 year, renewal always for 1 further year. Requesting a renewal every year 
    helps to keep the database up to date. The registrar must take care of the 
    renewal. If 4 weeks before the renewal-date domain is not renewed or deleted, 
    the holder will be notified by email. If the domain is still not deleted or 
    renewed by the renewal-date, admin-c will be notified by email and the domain 
    extended by a period grace of 4 weeks. During that time nameservice will be 
    suspended, thus giving a user an additional indication.
 
Communication between registry 
    and registrar :
PGP / GPG signed emails and/or 
    SSL connection.
Special tools and procedures 
    to synchronize the data-base of registry and registrar 
 
Startup :
Round Robin
Details explained in E 12
 
 
D15.2.3. Database capabilities. Database 
    size, throughput, scalability, procedures for object creation, editing, and 
    deletion, change notifications, registrar transfer procedures, grace period 
    implementation, reporting capabilities, etc.
 
The database used is Informix. Useful capabilities 
    such as integrity check, page lock, mirroring are enabled. A throughput of 
    1 registration/request per sec for at least 8 out of 24 hours per day has 
    already been tested and can be assured. Because of the queue-mechanism of 
    the requests, minor outages at the production-system will not affect the performance.
 
 
D15.2.4. Zone file 
    generation. Procedures for 
    changes, editing by registrars, updates. Address frequency, security, process, 
    interface, user authentication, logging, data back‑up.
 
Objects are created and maintained by the registrars 
    in a data-base-environment with the usual security and logging mechanism. 
    The zone-file for the name server will be created and distributed every 12 
    hours. 3 cycles of old versions are kept for emergency recovery at the name 
    server location, the old versions of at least one month will be kept on tape 
    at the registry.
 
 
D15.2.5. Zone file distribution and publication. 
    Locations of name servers, procedures for and means of distributing zone files 
    to them.
 
All name servers will be under control of the registry. 
    Transfer of zone-files by scp (secure copy).
Watchdog procedures will be used to monitor the 
    name servers (performance and usage). 
Locations of name servers not yet finally decided, 
    but according  D15.2.1. they will be 
    distributed across 3 continents ( America , Asia, Europe )
 
 
D15.2.6. Billing and collection systems. 
    Technical characteristics, system security, accessibility.
 
Prepayment will be enforced. Accredited Registrars 
    will have to credit an account on the system to be able to register domains. 
    Payment will be accepted by
·        
    credit 
    card (together with a signed fax), crediting within working day
·        
    bank 
    transfer (with a signed fax announcing the amount), crediting after credited 
    at the registry-bank.
·        
    Registrar 
    will be able to define a minimum balance of his account at which he will be 
    notified by email
 
 
 
 
D15.2.7. Data escrow and backup. Frequency 
    and procedures for backup of data. Describe hardware and systems used, data 
    format, identity of escrow agents, procedures for retrieval of data/rebuild 
    of database, etc.
 
It should be noted that the system will use RAID-Storage 
    with full redundancy. Additionally there will be: 
·        
    daily 
    backup on 2 tapes (one copy at the location of the production environment, 
    2nd at the programming side)
·        
    weekly 
    backup on CD, to be used as escrow at an appropriate deposit
 
Recovery-procedure will be tested at random.
 
 
D15.2.8. Publicly accessible look up/WHOIS 
    service. Address software and hardware, connection speed, search capabilities, 
    coordination with other WHOIS systems, etc.
 
WHOIS-server will be updated every 15 minutes. Usual 
    data will be shown in a machine- and human- readable format. A web-interface 
    for the WHOIS-server will be available. Reduction of reaction time for series 
    of queries from same ip, will be considered, although not yet decided.
 
An important additional web-based service will be 
    offered :
 
·        
    when 
    registering a domain, the registrant has the opportunity to define factors 
    describing his services.
·        
    Users 
    will be able to use these arguments to search for registrants that match.
See also D13.2.1. for details.
 
 
D15.2.9. System security. Technical and 
    physical capabilities and procedures to prevent system hacks, break‑ins, 
    data tampering, and other disruptions to operations. Physical security.
 
The system architecture provides highest possible 
    security. There are basically 2 separate computer systems:
 
·        
    Frontend 
    which is known to community, with normal IP-address, which only accepts the 
    requests and sends messages, the interface to the registrars. The Frontend 
    ( B ) is easily scalable by adding additional equipment (B2, B3 etc.)
 
·        
    Backend 
    which is isolated in an inner network, not accessible from outside, which 
    does the processing and keeps the data (database)
 
Physical and technical security is granted by the 
    subcontractors providing co-location.
 
   
   A Backend DataBase      
    
    
       
    
      
       
  
        
         
    
          
          
             
         
               
          
 
 
 
 
 
   
  
    
    
       
    
      
       
  
       
Internal network
(not accessible 
    
from world)
 
 
 
 
 
   
   B1 Frontend Gateway       B2 Frontend Gateway      
    
    
       
    
       
       
       
      
       
  
        
         
      
          
          
             
         
               
          
        
         
    
          
          
             
         
               
          
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
External network
 
     R§ Registrar         R1 Registrar         R2 Registrar        
      
     
     
         
     
           
      
            
            
               
           
                 
            
      
     
     
         
     
           
      
            
            
               
           
                 
            
      
    Worldwide-known 
     
         
     
           
      
            
            
               
           
                 
            
    
D15.2.10. Peak capacities. Technical 
    capability for handling a larger‑than‑projected demand for registration 
    or load. Effects on load on servers, databases, back‑up systems, support 
    systems, escrow systems, maintenance, personnel.
 
The various stages of the registration process and 
    other tasks are interconnected by queues. Failure of one component or process 
    does not harm, but only slow down the overall performance. Requests are not 
    lost, but queued for processing after recovery.
The initial system is designed to accept a minimum 
    work load of 1 registration/request per sec.
 
 
D15.2.11. System reliability. Define, 
    analyze, and quantify quality of service.
 
·        
    Name 
    servers : the presence of at least 3 independent systems at 3 different locations 
    ( Asia, Europe, USA ) at locations of well known connectivity providers will 
    assure the highest possible reliability (reaction time 1 hour).
·        
    WHOIS 
    : 2 systems will be available, one for backup (reaction time 1 hour).
·        
    Production-server 
    : 2 systems (2 backend , 2 frontend) will be available, both with the main 
    components redundant, one for backup (reaction time 1 hour).
·        
    Web-server 
    for queries : 1 system with main components redundant (reaction time 1 hour)
·        
    7/24 
    systems surveillance and alarm system for 2nd level support.
 
 
D15.2.12. System outage prevention. Procedures 
    for problem detection, redundancy of all systems, back up power supply, facility 
    security, technical security, availability of back up software, operating 
    system, and hardware, system monitoring, technical maintenance staff, server 
    locations.
 
The major components of the production-system are 
    redundant ( RAID mass-storage, double-processors etc.) 
 
Daily backup on 2 Tapes (one at co-location, another 
    at programming side) allows fast recovery in case of severe data-loss.
 
The co-location facilities of the connection providers 
    have the usual high standard of outage prevention, automatic fire-extinction, 
    alternative power supply , security etc.
 
 
D15.2.13. System recovery procedures. 
    Procedures for restoring the system to operation in the event of a system 
    outage, both expected and unexpected. Identify redundant/diverse systems for 
    providing service in the event of an outage and describe the process for recovery 
    from various types of failures, the training of technical staff who will perform 
    these tasks, the availability and backup of software and operating systems 
    needed to restore the system to operation, the availability of the hardware 
    needed to restore and run the system, backup electrical power systems, the 
    projected time for restoring the system, the procedures for testing the process 
    of restoring the system to operation in the event of an outage, the documentation 
    kept on system outages and on potential system problems that could result 
    in outages.
 
·        
    Using 
    environments with dual-processors, RAID-Systems and principal components redundant 
    allows partially automatic recovery. Assumed recovery time max. 2 hours.
·        
    In 
    the rare case of failure of a machine without the possibility to access the 
    RAID-array, recovery can be carried out from the daily backup-tape on the 
    2nd environment at the same side. Assumed recovery time : 8 hours.
·        
    In 
    the very rare case of sabotage or equivalent damage of the location the 2nd 
    copy of the daily backup-tape or the weekly escrow-disk can be used to initially 
    run the production on the test-environment. Assumed recovery time : 24-48 
    hours.
·        
    Details 
    of the recovery-procedure to be defined (which includes the already available 
    backup-procedures from the data-base software), recovery-procedure will be 
    tested at random.
·        
    Physical 
    security (access , electrical power etc) provided by major IP-connectivity 
    providers.
 
 
D15.2.14. Technical and other support. 
    Support for registrars and for Internet users and registrants. Describe technical 
    help systems, personnel accessibility, web‑based, telephone and other 
    support, support services to be offered, time availability of support, and 
    language‑availability of support.
 
·        
    Registrars 
    will be supported by
·        
    Email
·        
    Telephone
 
·        
    dispute 
    resolutions between 
·        
    registrar 
    and registrar
·        
    registrant 
    and registrar
will be available at registry 
    level
 
In the initial phase the following languages will 
    be supported
·        
    English
·        
    French
·        
    German
 
The registry-registrar agreement will have provisions 
    that the registrar has to provide support for registrants.
 
D15.3 
    Subcontractors. If you intend to subcontract any the following:
 
 
•                                             
all of the registry operation function;
•                                             
any portion of the registry function
accounting for 10% or more of overall costs of the registry function; or 
•                                             
any portion of any of the following
parts of the registry function accounting for 25% or more of overall
costs of the part: database operation, zone file generation, zone file
distribution and publication, billing
and collection, data
escrow and backup, and WHOIS service please 
 
(a) identify the subcontractor; 
(b) state the scope and terms of the
subcontract; and 
(c) attach a comprehensive technical
proposal from the subcontractor that describes its technical plans and
capabilities in a manner similar to that of the Technical Capabilities and Plan
section of the Registry Operator's Proposal. In addition, subcontractor
proposals should include full information on the subcontractor's technical,
financial, and management capabilities and resources.
 
 
The connectivity providers for the co-locations
are not yet determined.
 
The deposit for the data-escrow has not been
decided yet.
 
Programming and testing will be carried out by:
 
CSL GmbH.
Rathausufer 16
D-40213 Düsseldorf
 
Internet-fr will provide consulting for
connectivity and selection of hosting providers.
 
Internet-fr
2-12, Chemin de Femmes Massy F-91300
 
By signing this Registry Operator's Proposal, the
undersigned certifies (a) that he or she has authority to do so on behalf of
the registry operator and, on his or her own behalf and on behalf of the
registry operator, (b) that all information contained in this proposal, and all
documents attached to this proposal, is true and accurate to the best of
his/her/its knowledge and information. The undersigned and the registry
operator understand that any material misstatement or misrepresentation will
reflect negatively on any application of which this proposal is a part and may
cause cancellation of any delegation of a top‑level domain based on such
an application.
 
 
_______________________________
                                                Signature
 
_______________________________
Name (please print)
                                                PATRICIA HUSSON
_______________________________
Title
                                                CHAIRMAN
_______________________________
Name of Registry Operator
                                                NETBAY
_______________________________
Date
                                                30/09/2000
 
 
 
_______________________________                      _______________________________
Signature                                                                     Signature         
 
_______________________________                      _______________________________
Name (please
print)                                                    Name
(please print)
PATRICIA HUSSON                                                   SIEGFRIED
LANGENBACH
_______________________________                      _______________________________
Title                                                                             Title     
CHAIRMAN                                                                  CHAIRMAN
_______________________________                      _______________________________
Name of
Shareholder                                                  Name
of Shareholder
EURAFNET SA                                                           CSL GmbH
_______________________________                      _______________________________
Date                                                                            Date    
30/09/2000                                                                  30/09/2000
 
 
 
 
 (c) 2000 The Internet Corporation for Assigned
Names and Numbers
All rights
reserved.
Updated August 15, 2000