Supplemental
Question #11 to .org Applicants
Supplemental Question No. 11:
(posed to all applicants on 9 September for response by 12 September
2002)
Criterion 7 states in part: "The
specific registry services proposed should allow uninterrupted provision
of all services presently provided to .org registrants. In addition, plans
and provisions for additional registry services that will benefit .org
registrants will be considered. Consideration will be given to proposed
quality-of-service commitments. Any proposal should match or improve on
the performance levels of the current .org registry."
Item C28 of the proposal
form requested details regarding each applicant's proposed technical performance
and quality-of-service commitments:
C28. Describe the technical performance (including quality-of-service
commitments) you propose to make. See <http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/name/registry-agmt-appd-29jun01.htm>
for an example. The successor operator will be expected to meet the
Cross-Network Nameserver Performance Requirements set forth in section
2.1 of the document at the above URL.
In the various applicants' proposals, however, the proposed commitments
are scattered among various sections, stated in terms of different units,
and based on different measurement methods. For consistency sake, we are
asking each applicant to fill in the table below with key data on the
service commitments it proposes.
In responding to this supplemental question, please adhere to these guidelines:
1. Each applicant should respond to this supplemental question by filling
in the "commitment" and "location and proposal" columns
in the table below.
2. All data given in your supplemental response must have been included
in your .org proposal submitted on or before 18 June 2002 (or be subject
to being derived from that proposal in conjunction with well-known incorporated
references such as RFCs).
3. The "commitment" column should be filled in to give the
service commitment, if any, set forth in your proposal, stated in a manner
consistent with the entries in the "service attribute" and "unit
of measure" columns. Please note that a satisfactory service-commitment
definition may be stated even though your proposal did not specify all
service attributes in the table below.
4. The "location in proposal" column should be filled in with
one or more citations to the portion(s) of your proposal where the service
commitment was stated. If the commitment you insert in the "commitment"
column cannot readily be derived from the cited portion(s) of your proposal,
your commitment may be disregarded in connection with evaluation of your
proposal.
5. No more than 500 words of textual explanation (if needed) may be included
with the table that is submitted.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Service Attribute |
Unit of Measure |
Commitment |
Location in Proposal |
DNS service availability from each nameserver, minimum |
percentage uptime |
|
|
DNS service availability from any nameserver (i.e. at least one
nameserver available), minimum |
percentage uptime |
|
|
DNS query response rate for all nameservers combined, minimum absolute |
queries/sec |
|
|
DNS query response rate for each nameserver, minimum |
% of measured hourly peak on most loaded server |
|
|
DNS query response time, maximum, locally measured |
milliseconds |
|
|
Cross-network nameserver round-trip time, maximum |
milliseconds |
|
|
Cross-network nameserver packet loss, maximum |
percentage |
|
|
DNS update interval, maximum |
minutes |
|
|
SRS service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
|
|
SRS processing time, maximum for query operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
|
|
SRS processing time, maximum for write operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
|
|
SRS service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
|
|
SRS service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
|
|
SRS service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
|
|
SRS service extended planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/quarter |
|
|
SRS service extended planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
|
|
Whois service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
|
|
Whois query processing time, maximum |
a% < b milliseconds |
|
|
Whois update interval, maximum |
minutes |
|
|
Whois service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
|
|
Whois service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
|
|
Whois service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
|
|
Responses to Supplemental
Question No. 11:
The DotOrg Foundation
The Global Name Registry,
Limited
Internet
Multicasting Service, Inc. and Internet Software Consortium, Inc.
The Internet Society (ISOC)
NeuStar, Inc.
The .Org Foundation
Organic Names Ltd.
Register ORGanization, Inc.
SWITCH Swiss
Academic and Research Network
Union of International
Associations
Unity Registry
The DotOrg Foundation
The DotOrg Foundation (DOF) is pleased to note that its application
provides for the highest SLAs of any .org proposal. Our registry services
provider, Registry Advantage, has validated these SLAs by extensively
testing its systems using the current .org registry information. We
are confident of our ability to deliver on these metrics based on these
tests. In some cases, our commitments are more rigorous than anticipated
by ICANN’s question, as described in notes 3-5 below.
Service Attribute |
Unit of Measure |
Commitment |
Location in Proposal |
DNS service availability from each nameserver, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.95% |
C28 |
DNS service availability from any nameserver (i.e. at least one
nameserver available), minimum |
percentage uptime |
100% |
C28 (see note #3) |
DNS query response rate for all nameservers combined, minimum
absolute |
queries/sec |
140,000
(See Note #1)
|
C10, Test Results Attachment |
DNS query response rate for each nameserver, minimum |
% of measured hourly peak on most loaded server |
360%
(See Note #2)
|
C10, Test Results Attachment |
DNS query response time, maximum, locally measured |
milliseconds |
300 |
C28 |
Cross-network nameserver round-trip time, maximum |
milliseconds |
300 |
C28, referencing established ICANN CNNP guidelines |
Cross-network nameserver packet loss, maximum |
percentage |
10% |
C28, referencing established ICANN CNNP guidelines |
DNS update interval, maximum |
minutes |
5 |
C28 |
SRS service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.95% |
C28 |
SRS processing time, maximum for query operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 400 |
C28 |
SRS processing time, maximum for write operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 800 |
C28 |
SRS service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
8 (1.67 when yearly maximum is considered; see note #3) |
C28 |
SRS service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
To be determined in consultation with ICANN. See Note #5. |
|
SRS service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
3 |
C28 |
SRS service extended planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/quarter |
12 (3 when yearly maximum is considered; see note #4) |
C28 |
SRS service extended planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
To be determined in consultation with ICANN. |
|
Whois service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.95% |
C28 |
Whois query processing time, maximum |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 800 |
C28 |
Whois update interval, maximum |
minutes |
15 |
C28 |
Whois service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
8 (1.67 when yearly maximum is considered; see note #3) |
C28 |
Whois service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
To be determined in consultation with ICANN. See Note #5. |
|
Whois service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
3 |
C28 |
Notes to DotOrg Foundation Response:
1. Because our SLA commitments make no exceptions for high load situations,
we are fully committed to providing DNS service under the peak load
conditions that may exist for .org at the service levels outlined in
our applications. No specific commitments were set out in our application
as to query rate, but we view such an attempt at quantification as actually
limiting the scope of the SLA.
However, as part of the testing regimen that Registry Advantage performed
in preparation for the .org application, we have demonstrated the proven
capacity to serve over 18,000 queries per second from a single nameserver.
Extrapolating this across the eight total DNS POPs yields a combined
global capacity of over 140,000 queries per second. Additionally, DOF
proposes deploying multiple servers per POP, yielding even higher total
query rates.
2. As part of the testing regiment that Registry Advantage performed,
we have demonstrated the proven capacity to serve over 18,000 versus
an anticipated peak requirement on the most loaded nameserver of only
5,000 queries per second. (See the attachment on Test Results for the
derivation of the anticipated peak requirement.)
3. As described in C28, DOF will commit that at least half of all nameserver
clusters will be available 100% of the time; this significantly exceeds
the requirement that only a single nameserver be available.
4. In theory, a two-hour scheduled maintenance window could be used
once per week. However, as described in C28, DOF would be limited to
a total of ten scheduled maintenance windows per year. Averaging the
yearly maximum across the twelve month period yields an average monthly
limit of 1.67 hours of scheduled downtime.
5. In theory, the two six-hour extended maintenance window could be
used in the same quarter. However, DOF would be limited to a total of
two such windows per year, resulting in a quarterly average of 3 hours
of extended outage time.
6. No specific dates or times for maintenance windows were laid out
within the application. DOF expects to determine specific windows in
conjunction with ICANN. As an example, Registry Advantage's current
maintenance windows are laid out below (times in US Eastern Standard
Time):
- For critical infrastructure maintenance or updates, where possible
impact to more than once system or service may be involved, 4AM-8AM
Sundays is a reserved maintenance window.
- For non-critical infrastructure maintenance or updates, 8PM-12Midnight
Wednesday is a reserved maintenance window.
- For critical application maintenance or updates, 6AM-8AM Monday
and Thursday are reserved maintenance windows.
- For non-critical application maintenance or updates, 11AM-2PM Monday
and Thursday are reserved maintenance windows.
The Global
Name Registry, Limited
We provide the information on the service levels commitments contained
in our original application in response to Supplemental Question 11.
However, having reviewed such commitments against our actual performance
in running the .name registry over the last nine months, we have determined
that we can offer enhanced service commitments, as described below.
As required by each question, we provide each commitment and its respective
location in the application; moreover, to the extent we can offer enhanced
capabilities on any service component, we list such capabilities and
label them "REVISED" under the Commitment column. Through
our operation of the .name registry, we have proven that we can attain
such service levels, and we are confident that we can continue to do
so. We believe that by offering .org registrants and the Internet community
this greater level of commitments, we will continue to improve and create
new standards for the Internet.
Service Attribute |
Unit of Measure |
Commitment |
Location in Proposal |
DNS service availability from each nameserver, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.9% |
not available in the application |
DNS service availability from any nameserver (i.e. at least one
nameserver available), minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.999% (.org application)
REVISED: 99.9999% (actual .name number which GNR can commit to at
present) |
Printed document reference: "Section C19-C37", (Section
C28), page 30
Quote:
"99.999% per month across the nameserver constellation"
|
DNS query response rate for all nameservers combined, minimum
absolute |
queries/sec |
187,200 |
RFP reference: C17.10, figure 29 and subsequent table
Printed document reference:
"Section C17.2-16", page 115 |
DNS query response rate for each nameserver, minimum |
% of measured hourly peak on most loaded server |
The answer to this depends on the definition of "most loaded
server", and "hourly peak", which are not clearly
defined in the RFP
Each Global Name Registry nameserver performs a response rate
of 8,000 queries/second.
As calculated in Global Name Registry's response to ICANN Supplemental
Question #5, the current request volume for .org volume is about
7000 queries per second, with peaks at approximately 20,000 queries
per second. Assuming such peaks are "hourly peaks",
the Global Name Registry DNS capacity is approximately 187/20=935%
of the hourly peak.
Since Global Name Registry loadbalances all of its nameservers,
the query response rate for each nameserver should never exceed
20/187=10.6% of the measured hourly peak. |
Number not directly available, but can be calculated from numbers
at:
Printed document reference:
"Section C17.2-16", page 115 |
DNS query response time, maximum, locally measured |
milliseconds |
95% < 0.400ms (400 microseconds) locally measured
Maximum: 300ms ¹ |
not available in application |
Cross-network nameserver round-trip time, maximum |
milliseconds |
300ms |
Printed document reference: "Section C19-C37", (Section
C28), page 30 |
Cross-network nameserver packet loss, maximum |
percentage |
10%
REVISED: 1% |
Printed document reference: "Section C19-C37", (Section
C28), page 30 |
DNS update interval, maximum |
minutes |
15 minutes ² |
Printed document reference: "Section C19-C37", page
43
Quotes:
"zone files and WHOIS records being up to date within 15
minutes of registration or modification" (Section C19-C37,
page 43)
"For the purpose of the zone file residing on the Master
DNS, this is more a matter of latency than of frequency [...]The
update latency under normal operating conditions would in most
cases be measured in seconds" (Section C17.2-16, Page 40) |
SRS service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.4%
REVISED: 99.8% |
Printed document reference: "Section C19-C37", (Section
C28), page 30
(Section C28) |
SRS processing time, maximum for query operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 3000ms |
Printed document reference: "Section C19-C37", (Section
C28), page 30
Other relevant quote:
"[the query capacity] can be scaled horizontally as described
further below in this section to serve hundreds or even thousands
of requests per second. This greatly relieves the main database
from the load experienced during Add Storms" ("Section
C17.2-16", page 110)
See also:
"Section C17.2-16", page 34 ("Database design parameters")
|
SRS processing time, maximum for write operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 3000ms |
Printed document reference: "Section C19-C37", (Section
C28), page 30
Other relevant quote:
"[the query capacity] can be scaled horizontally as described
further below in this section to serve hundreds or even thousands
of requests per second. This greatly relieves the main database
from the load experienced during Add Storms"("Section
C17.2-16", page 110) |
SRS service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
8 |
Printed document reference: "Section C19-C37", (Section
C28), page 30 |
SRS service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
0600-1500 GMT Sunday |
Printed document reference: "Section C19-C37", (Section
C28), page 30 |
SRS service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
7 days |
Printed document reference: "Section C19-C37", (Section
C28), page 30 |
SRS service extended planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/quarter |
48 hours per quarter |
Printed document reference: "Section C19-C37", (Section
C28), page 30 |
SRS service extended planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
0600-1500 GMT Saturday or Sunday |
Printed document reference: "Section C19-C37", (Section
C28), page 30 |
Whois service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.4%
REVISED: 99.99% |
Printed document reference: "Section C19-C37", (Section
C28), page 30 |
Whois query processing time, maximum |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 1500ms ¹ |
Printed document reference:
"Section C19-C37", (Section C28), page 30
Other relevant quote:
"Whois Service will, on average, be able to handle 200 queries
per second"
("Section C19-C37", Page 28) |
Whois update interval, maximum |
minutes |
95% < 1 minute
maximum 15 minutes |
Printed document reference: "Section C17.2-16",
page 32
Quote:
"will usually be updated within seconds of changes to the
main database, and at most within 15 minutes" ("Section
C17.2-16", page 32) |
Whois service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
8 |
Printed document reference: "Section C19-C37", (Section
C28), page 30 |
Whois service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
0600-1500 GMT Sunday |
Printed document reference: "Section C19-C37", (Section
C28), page 30 |
Whois service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
7 days |
Printed document reference: "Section C19-C37", (Section
C28), page 30 |
Notes to GNR Response: ¹ In evaluating this information,
it is important to note that there is a distinct difference between
maximum processing time for a single query, which reflects only one
query, and the average processing time per query. Latency in the system,
including firewalls, network interfaces, TCP/IP packeting, memory access
and operating system context switching will always result in a difference
between single query time and average query time. Network interfaces
and context switching are inherently batch processes and can parallel
process many queries in one "latency timeunit". The Global
Name Registry system is designed to scale to more than 50 million domain
names, and can achieve the stated single query times even under hard
load and when processing thousands of transactions per second.
² The question has been evaluated as the time until the DNS update
will resolve on each Global Name Registry DNS location, worldwide, as
opposed to only on a (set of) master servers, where the timespan is
measured in seconds, like for Whois.
Internet
Multicasting Service, Inc. and Internet Software Consortium, Inc.
Service Attribute |
Unit of Measure |
Commitment |
Location in Proposal |
DNS service availability from each nameserver, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.99% |
3.14.4 |
DNS service availability from any nameserver (i.e. at least one
nameserver available), minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.999% |
3.14.6 [A] |
DNS query response rate for all nameservers combined, minimum
absolute |
queries/sec |
96,000 query/s |
3.14.6 [B] |
DNS query response rate for each nameserver, minimum |
% of measured hourly peak on most loaded server |
100% |
3.14.6 [C] |
DNS query response time, maximum, locally measured |
milliseconds |
150ms |
3.14.6 [D] |
Cross-network nameserver round-trip time, maximum |
milliseconds |
300ms |
3.14.4 [E] |
Cross-network nameserver packet loss, maximum |
percentage |
10% |
3.14.4 [E] |
DNS update interval, maximum |
minutes |
5 minutes |
3.14.6 [F] |
SRS service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.9% |
3.14.6 [G] |
SRS processing time, maximum for query operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 1500ms |
3.14.6 |
SRS processing time, maximum for write operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 3000ms |
3.14.6 |
SRS service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
8 hours per month |
3.14.6 |
SRS service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
not specified |
[H] |
SRS service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
3 days |
3.14.6 |
SRS service extended planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/quarter |
4.5 hours per quarter |
3.14.6 [I] |
SRS service extended planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
not specified |
[H] |
Whois service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.5% |
3.14.6 [J] |
Whois query processing time, maximum |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 1500ms |
3.14.6 |
Whois update interval, maximum |
minutes |
5 minutes |
3.14.6 [K] |
Whois service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
8 hours per month |
3.14.6 |
Whois service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
not specified |
[H] |
Whois service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
3 days |
3.14.6 |
Notes to IMS/ISC Response:
[A] In 3.14.6[5] we specified at least 99.999% uptime per calendar
year.
[B] Based on benchmarks and operational experience with similar hardware
and software, three server clusters of 2-4 systems each as specified
in the proposal.
[C] The maximum query processing time specified in 3.14.6[5] corresponds
to the theoretical case of near-total nameserver failure, where one
single public, authoritative nameserver remains in service.
[D] In 3.14.6[5] we specified 150ms for at least 95% of queries.
[E] These figures are taken from the requirements described in section
2.1 of the document "Unsponsored TLD Agreement: Appendix D (.name)"[2],
which we stated we would meet in 3.14.4[4].
[F] In 3.14.6[5] we specified 5 minutes, at least 95% of the time.
[G] In 3.14.6[5] we specified 99.9% per calendar year.
[H] We understand this question to be a request for clarification of
the timing of maintenance windows. In 3.12.3[3] we commit to establishing
regular maintenance windows, in accordance with common industry practice,
for routine, non-outage, minor changes to software, systems, or network
configuration. The specific days and hours of these maintenance windows
were considered to be a low-level detail not necessary for explicit
inclusion in the proposal.
[I] In 3.14.6[5] we specified 18 hours per calendar year, giving (18
/ 4) = 4.5 hours per quarter.
[J] In 3.14.6[5] we specified 99.5% per calendar year.
[K] In 3.14.6[5] we specified 5 minutes, at least 95% of the time.
The Internet Society
(ISOC)
In response to question #11, provided below are the service commitments
requested:
Service Attribute |
Unit of Measure |
Commitment |
Location in Proposal |
DNS service availability from each nameserver, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.73% |
C28.3 – Fig. 54 & 55 |
DNS service availability from any nameserver (i.e. at least one
nameserver available), minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.999% |
C17.13.1 |
DNS query response rate for all nameservers combined, minimum
absolute |
queries/sec |
Min. 10,000
(Maximum 300,000/sec)1,3 |
C17.5.3.a |
DNS query response rate for each nameserver, minimum |
% of measured hourly peak on most loaded server |
Not Included in our June 18 proposal |
N/A |
DNS query response time, maximum, locally measured |
milliseconds |
Not Included in our June 18 proposal |
N/A |
Cross-network nameserver round-trip time, maximum |
milliseconds |
300 |
Appendix N, Sec 2 |
Cross-network nameserver packet loss, maximum |
percentage |
<10% |
Appendix N, Sec 2 |
DNS update interval, maximum |
minutes |
15 |
C27.c.1.a |
SRS service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.45% |
C28.3 – Fig. 54 & 55 |
SRS processing time, maximum for query operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
a) No % included in our June 18 proposal; b) 400ms |
C28.3 – Fig 54 & 55 |
SRS processing time, maximum for write operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
a) No % included in our June 18 proposal; b) 800ms |
C28.3 – Fig. 54 & 55 |
SRS service planned outage2 duration, maximum |
hours/month |
8 hrs/month (includes WHOIS) |
C28.2.10 |
SRS service planned outage2 timeframe |
days and hours |
01:00 to 09:00 UTC on Sunday |
Appendix D, Exhibit G 1.9 |
SRS service planned outage2 notification, minimum |
days |
7 days |
Appendix D 5.12 |
SRS service extended planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/quarter |
0 hrs3 |
C28.2.10 |
SRS service extended planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
01:00 to 09:00 UTC on Sunday |
Appendix D, Exhibit G 1.9 |
Whois service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.45% |
C28.3 - Fig. 54 & 55 |
Whois query processing time, maximum |
a% < b milliseconds |
a) No % included in our June 18 proposal;
b) 800 ms4
|
C28.3 – Fig. 54 & 55 |
Whois update interval, maximum |
minutes |
"near real-time" |
C17.8 |
Whois service planned outage2 duration, maximum |
hours/month |
8 hrs/month (includes SRS) |
C28.2.10 |
Whois service planned outage2 timeframe |
days and hours |
01:00 to 09:00 UTC on Sunday |
Appendix D, Exhibit G 1.9 |
Whois service planned outage2 notification, minimum |
days |
7 days |
Appendix D 5.12 |
Notes to ISOC Response: 1. The ISOC proposal cited a minimum
capacity of 10,000 queries per second. The UltraDNS managed DNS service
is capable of performing at rated SLA levels up to 300,000 queries per
second.
2. The total maximum Planned Outage Time of 8 hrs/month includes both
WHOIS and SRS outage times.
3. Planned Outage Time can be used as Extended Planned Outage Time;
the total planned outage time per period is the sum of Planned Outage
and Extended Planned Outage.
4. The .INFO WHOIS system, upon which the .ORG WHOIS system is intended
to be modeled, currently performs at under 200 ms response time on average.
NeuStar, Inc.
Service Attribute |
Unit of Measure |
Commitment |
Location in Proposal |
DNS service availability from each nameserver, minimum |
percentage uptime |
The availability of each nameserver is a component of overall
DNS service availability (see below). |
Section C28, table 1, line 1 (pg. V-9) |
DNS service availability from any nameserver (i.e. at least one
nameserver available), minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.999% per calendar year. |
Section C28, table 1, line 1 (pg. V-9) |
DNS query response rate for all nameservers combined, minimum
absolute |
queries/sec |
Configured for 1,200 queries/sec per nameserver * 8 nameservers
=
9,600 queries/sec.
Sized to handle 5,000 queries/sec per nameserver * 8 nameservers
= 40,000 queries/sec. |
Section C17.10 (pg. III-64)
Section 17.1.1 (pg. III-4) |
DNS query response rate for each nameserver, minimum |
% of measured hourly peak on most loaded server |
Configured for 1,200 queries/sec per nameserver.
Sized to handle 5,000 queries/sec per nameserver. |
Section C17.1.3.2 (pg. III-16). |
DNS query response time, maximum, locally measured |
milliseconds |
95% < 1,500 ms |
Section C28, table 1, line 5 (pg. V-9) |
Cross-network nameserver round-trip time, maximum |
milliseconds |
300 ms |
Section C28, table 1, line 13 (pg. V-10) |
Cross-network nameserver packet loss, maximum |
percentage |
10% |
Section C28, table 1, line 13 (pg. V-10) |
DNS update interval, maximum |
minutes |
95% < 15 min |
Section C28, table 1, line 6 (pg. V-9) |
SRS service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.9% per calendar month |
Section C28, table 1, line 1 (pg. V-9) |
SRS processing time, maximum for query operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 1500 ms |
Section C28, table 1, line 3 (pg. V-9) |
SRS processing time, maximum for write operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 3000 ms |
Section C28, table 1, line 2 (pg. V-9) |
SRS service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
8 hours/ calendar month |
Section C28, table 1, line 7 (pg. V-9) |
SRS service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
Sun: 0600-1400 UTC |
Section C28, table 1, line 8 (pg. V-9) |
SRS service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
3 days |
Section C28, table 1, line 9 (pg. V-10) |
SRS service extended planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/quarter |
18 hours per calendar quarter |
Section C28, table 1, line 10 (pg. V-10) |
SRS service extended planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
Sat or Sun: 0600-1400 UTC |
Section C28, table 1, line 11 (pg. V-10) |
Whois service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.95% per calendar month |
Section C28, table 1, line 1 (pg. V-9) |
Whois query processing time, maximum |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 1500 ms |
Section C28, table 1, line 4 (pg. V-9) |
Whois update interval, maximum |
minutes |
95% < 15 minutes |
Section C28, table 1, line 6 (pg. V-9) |
Whois service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
8 hours per calendar month |
Section C28, table 1, line 7 (pg. V-9) |
Whois service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
Sun: 0600-1400 UTC |
Section C28, table 1, line 8 (pg. V-9) |
Whois service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
3 days |
Section C28, table 1, line 9 (pg. V-10) |
The .Org Foundation
In Section C28 we committed to the performance specifications listed
within ICANN’s Unsponsored TLD Agreement: Appendix D (.name) found
at the following ICANN website: http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/name/registry-agmt-appd-29jun01.htm.
Additional (more restrictive and higher) performance commitments are
stated in the rest of Section C28 and elsewhere in our proposal.
Service Attribute |
Unit of Measure |
Commitment |
Location in Proposal |
DNS service availability from each nameserver, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.999% |
C28
See note 1 below |
DNS service availability from any nameserver (i.e. at least one
nameserver available), minimum |
percentage uptime |
100% |
C28, C17.13 |
DNS query response rate for all nameservers combined, minimum
absolute |
queries/sec |
32,233/sec |
C28
See note 2 below |
DNS query response rate for each nameserver, minimum |
% of measured hourly peak on most loaded server |
300% |
C28 |
DNS query response time, maximum, locally measured |
milliseconds |
5 |
C15.2, C17.12
See note 3 below |
Cross-network nameserver round-trip time, maximum |
milliseconds |
300 |
C28 |
Cross-network nameserver packet loss, maximum |
percentage |
10% |
C28 |
DNS update interval, maximum |
minutes |
0.16 |
C28 |
SRS service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.5% |
C17.13, C28 |
SRS processing time, maximum for query operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
100%<3000 milliseconds |
C28 |
SRS processing time, maximum for write operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
100%<3000 milliseconds |
C28 |
SRS service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
4 |
C17.13
See note 4 below |
SRS service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
0600-1500 GMT Sunday |
C28 |
SRS service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
7 |
C28 |
SRS service extended planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/quarter |
36 |
C28 |
SRS service extended planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
0600-1500 GMT Saturday or Sunday |
C28 |
Whois service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.4% |
C28 |
Whois query processing time, maximum |
a% < b milliseconds |
100%<1500 |
C28 |
Whois update interval, maximum |
minutes |
0.16 |
C28 |
Whois service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
4 |
C17.13
See note 4 below |
Whois service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
0600-1800 GMT Saturday or Sunday |
C28 |
Whois service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
7 |
C28 |
Notes to .Org Foundation Response:
Note 1: We proposed at least 5 physical DNS servers behind each of
7 virtual IPs. We interpreted the specification we cited in section
C28 “across name servers” to mean for each name-server IP
address, therefore we committed to 99.999% uptime (or approx 30 seconds
of downtime per month) for each nameserver IP. This in essence represents
the uptime for the particular data center where the DNS server shared
IP and associated name servers are located (for example, rackspace.com,
offer 99.999% uptime SLAs). We commit to having at least one of the
5 physical servers behind that IP up 100% of the time.
Note 2: The number of DNS queries performed on the current .org name
server constellation was not disclosed in the confidential information
given to us. Therefore, in section C28, we estimated that the current
.org name server constellation is sized to handle 390 million requests
per day per name server on each of 10 name servers (see C28 4.1.2 Performance
Level). We proposed 7 name server virtual IPs, and therefore committed
(in compliance with RFC2870) to a capacity of 557 million queries per
day for each shared name server IP. Since we committed to 99.999% uptime
for each shared name server IP, it is extremely unlikely that more than
one name server shared IP will be completely down at the same time.
If this unlikely event happens and two are completely down at the same
time, the remaining 5 IPs (25 physical servers) will support 2.785 billion
queries per day, therefore the minimum committed amount is 32,233 per
second. Each DNS server (not shared IP, but physical box) has been measured
to perform approximately 1200 queries per second (max sustained capacity)
consistently, so if any 10 out of the proposed minimum 35 physical servers
are down or unreachable, the minimum commitment will still be met. The
maximum, or the capacity when all name servers (all 35 proposed servers)
are functioning and reachable, is 3.9 billion queries per day or 45,138
per second.
Note 3: In our proposal we commit to being compliant with all RFCs
and BCPs. RFC2870 replaces RFC2010, which specifies a 5 milliseconds
response time. RFC 2870 does not specify a DNS response time.
Note 4: SRS and Whois service planned outage duration combined will
not exceed 4 hours per month. A maximum of 4 hours per month will be
scheduled for downtime, which can be used for whois or SRS, or both
(if both are scheduled for downtime during the same period). This 4-hour
downtime commitment for whois and SRS includes the scheduled downtime
required for the switchover from the prior registry operator to The
.Org Foundation as registry operator (see proposal section C18.4).
Organic Names Ltd.
Service Attribute |
Unit of Measure |
Commitment |
Location in Proposal |
DNS service availability from each nameserver, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.9999% |
p66 |
DNS service availability from any nameserver (i.e. at least one
nameserver available), minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.9999% |
p66 |
DNS query response rate for all nameservers combined, minimum
absolute |
queries/sec |
65,000 |
Derived - See note 1 below |
DNS query response rate for each nameserver, minimum |
% of measured hourly peak on most loaded server |
1300% |
Derived - See note 1 below |
DNS query response time, maximum, locally measured |
milliseconds |
500ms |
p65 |
Cross-network nameserver round-trip time, maximum |
milliseconds |
500ms |
p65 |
Cross-network nameserver packet loss, maximum |
percentage |
0.1% |
p65 |
DNS update interval, maximum |
minutes |
180 |
p52 |
SRS service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.5% |
p66 |
SRS processing time, maximum for query operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 2000ms |
p65 |
SRS processing time, maximum for write operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 2000ms |
p65 |
SRS service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
12hrs |
p66 |
SRS service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
0400-1200 GMT
Sundays
|
p66 |
SRS service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
7 |
p66 |
SRS service extended planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/quarter |
36hrs/qtr |
p66 |
SRS service extended planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
0400-1500 GMT
Sundays
|
p66 |
Whois service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.5% |
p66 |
Whois query processing time, maximum |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 1500ms |
p66 |
Whois update interval, maximum |
minutes |
5 minutes |
p57 |
Whois service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
8hrs/month |
p66 |
Whois service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
0400-1200 GMT
Sunday
|
p66 |
Whois service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
7 days |
p66 |
Note to Organic Names Response:
Note 1: We are assuming that under normal conditions .org generates
approximately an average of 2,500 queries per second, peaking at twice
this, i.e. 5,000 queries per second. We have committed that any single
server from our constellation can handle the load of the entire constellation,
thus the maximum capacity we have committed to across a fully operative
constellation of servers is 13 x 5,000 or 65,000 queries per second,
and the each name-server has capacity of at least 13 times the peak
hourly load (1300%).
Register ORGanization,
Inc.
Below please find RegisterOrg's response to supplemental question 11.
RegisterOrg is pleased to note that its application for the redelegation
of the .org registry provides the highest SLAs of any .org proposal.
Our registry services provider, Registry Advantage, has validated these
SLAs by extensively testing its systems using the current .org registry
information. We are confident in our ability to deliver on these metrics
based on these tests. Indeed, in some cases, our SLA commitments are
more rigorous than anticipated by the question posed by ICANN, as described
in notes 3-5.
Service Attribute |
Unit of Measure |
Commitment |
Location in Proposal |
DNS service availability from each nameserver, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.95% |
C28 |
DNS service availability from any nameserver (i.e. at least one
nameserver available), minimum |
percentage uptime |
100% |
C28 (see note #3)
|
DNS query response rate for all nameservers combined, minimum
absolute |
queries/sec |
140,000 (See Note #1)
|
C10, Test Results Attachment |
DNS query response rate for each nameserver, minimum |
% of measured hourly peak on most loaded server |
360% (See Note #2)
|
C10, Test Results Attachment |
DNS query response time, maximum, locally measured |
milliseconds |
300 |
C28 |
Cross-network nameserver round-trip time, maximum |
milliseconds |
300 |
C28, referencing established ICANN CNNP guidelines |
Cross-network nameserver packet loss, maximum |
percentage |
10% |
C28, referencing established ICANN CNNP guidelines |
DNS update interval, maximum |
minutes |
5 |
C28 |
SRS service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.95% |
C28 |
SRS processing time, maximum for query operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 400 |
C28 |
SRS processing time, maximum for write operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 800 |
C28 |
SRS service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
8 (1.67 when yearly maximum is considered; see note #3) |
C28 |
SRS service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
To be determined in consultation with ICANN. See Note #5. |
|
SRS service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
3 |
C28 |
SRS service extended planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/quarter |
12 (3 when yearly maximum is considered; see note #4) |
C28 |
SRS service extended planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
To be determined in consultation with ICANN. |
|
Whois service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.95% |
C28 |
Whois query processing time, maximum |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 800 |
C28 |
Whois update interval, maximum |
minutes |
15 |
C28 |
Whois service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
8 (1.67 when yearly maximum is considered; see note #3) |
C28 |
Whois service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
To be determined in consultation with ICANN. See Note #5. |
|
Whois service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
3 |
C28 |
Notes to RegisterORGanization Response:
1. Because our SLA commitments make no exceptions for high load situations,
we are fully committed to providing DNS service under the peak load
conditions that may exist for .org at the service levels outlined in
our applications. No specific commitments were set out in our application
as to query rate, but we view such an attempt at quantification as actually
limiting the scope of the SLA.
However, as part of the testing regimen performed by Registry Advantage
as part of our application, we have demonstrated the proven capacity
to serve over 18,000 queries per second from a single nameserver. Extrapolating
this across the eight total DNS POPs yields a combined global capacity
of over 140,000 queries per second. Additionally, RegisterOrg proposes
deploying multiple servers per POP, yielding even higher total query
rates.
2. As part of the testing regiment that Registry Advantage performed,
we have demonstrated the capacity to serve over 18,000 versus an anticipated
peak requirement on the most loaded nameserver of only 5,000 queries
per second. (See the Test Results attachment for the derivation of the
anticipated peak requirement.)
3. As described in C28, RegisterOrg will commit that at least half
of all nameserver clusters will be available 100% of the time; this
significantly exceeds the requirement that only a single nameserver
be available.
4. In theory, a two-hour scheduled maintenance window could be used
once per week. However, as described in C28, RegisterOrg would be limited
to a total of ten scheduled maintenance windows per year. Averaging
the yearly maximum across the twelve month period yields an average
monthly limit of 1.67 hours of scheduled downtime.
5. In theory, the two six-hour extended maintenance window could be
used in the same quarter. However, RegisterOrg would be limited to a
total of two such windows per year, resulting in a quarterly average
of 3 hours of extended outage time.
6. Specific dates and times for maintenance windows were not stated
in our application. RegisterOrg expects to establish specific windows
in conjunction with ICANN. As an example, Registry Advantage’s
current maintenance windows are provided (times noted are Eastern Standard
Time):
- For critical infrastructure maintenance or updates, where possible
impact to more than one system or service may be involved, 4AM-8AM
Sundays is a reserved maintenance window.
- For non-critical infrastructure maintenance or updates, 8PM-12
AM Wednesday is a reserved maintenance window.
- For critical application maintenance or updates, 6AM-8AM Monday
and Thursday are reserved maintenance windows.
- For non-critical application maintenance or updates, 11AM-2PM Monday
and Thursday are reserved.
SWITCH
Swiss Academic and Research Network
Service Attribute |
Unit of Measure |
Commitment |
Location in Proposal |
DNS service availability from each nameserver, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99 |
Appendix C, Section 3 |
DNS service availability from any nameserver (i.e. at least one
nameserver available), minimum |
percentage uptime |
100 |
App. C, Section 3 and
App. CA, Section 15, "GNS Feature Summary" |
DNS query response rate for all nameservers combined, minimum
absolute |
queries/sec |
see reference [1] |
|
DNS query response rate for each nameserver, minimum |
% of measured hourly peak on most loaded server |
see reference [1] |
|
DNS query response time, maximum, locally measured |
milliseconds |
derived from service attribute no. 3 |
Comment:
We interpret this service attribute to be understood as the time
between reception of a query on a local interface and submission
of a response, which is essentially given by the inverse of the
maximum sustained query rate stated in [1]. |
Cross-network nameserver round-trip time, maximum |
milliseconds |
300, see reference [2] |
|
Cross-network nameserver packet loss, maximum |
percentage |
10, see reference [2] |
|
DNS update interval, maximum |
minutes |
120 |
App. C, Section 3 and
App. CA, Section 6, "Updating the DotOrg Zone" Comment:
This number is not a technical limitation (which is actually well
below that, see App. C, Section 3, item 4), it is a design choice
that takes into account the caching mechanism inherent in DNS
(very low TTL values of NS records should be avoided). |
SRS service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.4, see reference [3] |
App. B, Section 7b |
SRS processing time, maximum for query operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
Processing time = 100…200 ms (estimated)
Maximum queuing delay (peak load) =
(burstqueue + 1) * processing time
<3000 ms
|
App. B, Section 8b
App. B, Section 8b
|
SRS processing time, maximum for write operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
Processing time = 100…200 ms (estimated)
Maximum queuing delay (peak load) =
(burstqueue + 1) * processing time
<5000 ms
|
App. B, Section 8b
App. B, Section 8b
|
SRS service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
0 |
see reference [3] |
SRS service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
0 |
see reference [3] |
SRS service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
0 |
see reference [3] |
SRS service extended planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/quarter |
0 |
see reference [3] |
SRS service extended planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
0 |
see reference [3] |
Whois service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.9 |
|
Whois query processing time, maximum |
a% < b milliseconds |
Processing time = 400 ms (estimated)
Maximum processing time (substring search) <6000 ms |
App. B, Section 6a
App. B, Section 6a
|
Whois update interval, maximum |
minutes |
<1 |
immediate synchronization of WHOIS data base |
Whois service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
0 |
see reference [3] |
Whois service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
0 |
see reference [3] |
Whois service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
0 |
see reference [3] |
References for SWITCH Response:
[1] Instead of service attributes 3 and 4 above, we provide maximum
sustained query rates for each server as stated below:
Commitment |
values between 1’500 and 30’000 queries/second |
Location in Proposal |
App. C, Section 11 |
Comment |
The meaning of service attribute no. 4 is unclear to us. We make
the commitment that all name servers will be able to handle at least
three times the estimated average load which is 430 queries/sec
(see App. CA, Section 7, “System Capacity"). Note that
figures derived from real-world conditions have not yet been disclosed
to us by VeriSign.
Unfortunately, the figures in fields 17, 18, 19 in our tables
in App. C, Section 11, are inconsistently assigned. The only relevant
number, however, is the maximal sustained query rate, which is
always the largest number in any of the three fields in all tables
in App. C, Section 11. |
[2] Comment:
We commit ourselves to the performance parameters as stated in http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/name/registry-agmt-appd-29jun01.htm.
While these parameters are well defined and verifiable, we believe that
they are not a meaningful measure for the quality of service as perceived
by an "average user" in the Internet. Please refer to App.
CA, Section 9, "Global Infrastructure and Connectivity" of
our proposed DNS solution for statements with regard to this issue.
[3] Comment to planned outage times:
There are no planned outages for SRS and WHOIS services due to the redundant
design of our data centers. During an update of one system the secondary
system takes over all services. SRS availability = 99.4%. The probability
of failure is comprised of the square of the sum of the probabilities
of failure of components (data base, RRP/EPP server, gateway) plus the
probability of failure induced by human interaction (see App. B, Section
7b).
Union of
International Associations
Service Attribute |
Unit of Measure |
Commitment |
Location in Proposal |
DNS service availability from each nameserver, minimum |
percentage uptime |
|
|
DNS service availability from any nameserver (i.e. at least one
nameserver available), minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.999% |
Appendix C
Pg. 9 Sec. 7.3
|
DNS query response rate for all nameservers combined, minimum
absolute |
queries/sec |
5,000,000/sec. |
Pg. 80 Sec. C17.10 |
DNS query response rate for each nameserver, minimum |
% of measured hourly peak on most loaded server |
300% |
Appendix C
Pg. 5 Sec. 4.1.2 |
DNS query response time, maximum, locally measured |
milliseconds |
300 ms |
Appendix C
Pg. 6 Sec. 4.1.3 |
Cross-network nameserver round-trip time, maximum |
milliseconds |
300 ms |
Appendix C
Exhibit A
Pg. 10 Sec. 2.1 |
Cross-network nameserver packet loss, maximum |
percentage |
10% |
Appendix C
Exhibit A
Pg. 10 Sec. 2.1 |
DNS update interval, maximum |
minutes |
3 min. |
Pg. 66 Sec. C17.8 |
SRS service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.4% |
Appendix C
Pg. 9 Sec. 7.3 |
SRS processing time, maximum for query operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 3000 ms |
Appendix C
Pg. 9 Sec. 7.3 |
SRS processing time, maximum for write operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 3000 ms |
Appendix C
Pg. 9 Sec. 7.3 |
SRS service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
8 hrs./mo. |
Appendix C
Pg. 9 Sec. 7.3 |
SRS service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
0000-0400 GMT Sunday |
Appendix C
Pg. 9 Sec. 7.3 |
SRS service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
7 days |
Appendix C
Pg. 9 Sec. 7.3 |
SRS service extended planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/quarter |
12 hrs. |
Appendix C
Pg. 9 Sec. 7.3 |
SRS service extended planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
0000-1200 GMT
Sat. or Sun.
|
Appendix C
Pg. 9 Sec. 7.3 |
Whois service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.4% |
Appendix C
Pg. 9 Sec. 7.3 |
Whois query processing time, maximum |
a% < b milliseconds |
95% < 1500 ms |
Appendix C
Pg. 9 Sec. 7.3 |
Whois update interval, maximum |
minutes |
3 min. |
Pg. 66 Sec. C17.8 |
Whois service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
8 hrs./mo. |
Appendix C
Pg. 9 Sec. 7.3 |
Whois service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
0000-0400 GMT
Sunday
|
Appendix C
Pg. 9 Sec. 7.3 |
Whois service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
7 days |
Appendix C
Pg. 9 Sec. 7.3 |
Unity Registry
Service Attribute |
Unit of Measure |
Commitment |
Location in Proposal |
DNS service availability from each nameserver, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.999% |
Section C28 |
DNS service availability from any nameserver (i.e. at least one
nameserver available), minimum |
percentage uptime |
100% |
Section 17.5 |
DNS query response rate for all nameservers combined, minimum
absolute |
queries/sec |
30,000 queries / sec (per server) |
Section 17.5 |
DNS query response rate for each nameserver, minimum |
% of measured hourly peak on most loaded server |
300% |
Section C28 |
DNS query response time, maximum, locally measured |
milliseconds |
1.5s |
Section C28 |
Cross-network nameserver round-trip time, maximum |
milliseconds |
300ms |
Section C28 |
Cross-network nameserver packet loss, maximum |
percentage |
10% |
Section C28 |
DNS update interval, maximum |
minutes |
15mins (Though updates will be preformed "instantly"
in real time using dynamic updates as per RFC-2136, 15 min max propagation
to secondary servers) |
Section C28, C17.4, C17.5 |
SRS service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.90% |
Section C28 |
SRS processing time, maximum for query operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
97% < 4000ms |
Section C28 |
SRS processing time, maximum for write operations |
a% < b milliseconds |
97% < 4000ms |
Section C28 |
SRS service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
8hours / month |
Section C28 |
SRS service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
0600-1400 Sunday UTC |
Section C28 |
SRS service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
7days |
Section C28 |
SRS service extended planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/quarter |
18 hours / quarter |
Section C28 |
SRS service extended planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
0600-1400 Sunday UTC |
Section C28 |
Whois service availability, minimum |
percentage uptime |
99.95% |
Section C28 |
Whois query processing time, maximum |
a% < b milliseconds |
97% < 1.5s |
Section C28 |
Whois update interval, maximum |
minutes |
15mins |
Section C28 |
Whois service planned outage duration, maximum |
hours/month |
8hours / month |
Section C28 |
Whois service planned outage timeframe |
days and hours |
0600-1400 Sunday UTC |
Section C28 |
Whois service planned outage notification, minimum |
days |
7days |
Section C28 |
Notes to Unity Registry Response:
- The above mentioned SLA’s do not make up the complete set
of SLA's guaranteed by Unity Registry, see extra table below for remaining
SLA’s. We would also call attention to the statement:
"Unity Registry expects to enter into detailed discussion with
ICANN about the technical performance commitments and as part of the
process of drawing up the Registry Agreement" which is contained
within section C28 of our tender.
- It is also worth noting that Unity Registry systems have been designed
to perform as fast as possible without reducing stability and security,
note the following statement:
"The EPP Daemon design focused on performance and robustness,
utilizing advanced features offered in the Linux Kernel. The software
has been rigorously tested by both AusRegistry and an independent
third party, Afilias, the current administrators of the .info registry
and, on their own admission, has proved to exceptionally better and
out perform other EPP registries."
- We would just like draw your attention to the fact that Unity Registry
in some cases has specified higher response times then some applicants,
these response times are specified as: "@ performance level"
(at committed transaction performance level). These times are not
indicative of the true high performance capabilities of the registry
system, when severs are experiencing standard load levels, transaction
times will significantly reduce. The current .au registry operated
by AusRegistry provides exceptional performance on white box Intel
hardware (performance figures available upon request) Unity is expecting
similar industry leading performance from our .org registry design
based on Sun/Intel hardware.
Additional SLA's
Service Attribute |
Unit of Measure |
Commitment |
Location in Proposal |
SRS Performance Level (RRP) |
tx/s |
400tx/s |
Section C28 |
SRS Performance Level (EPP) |
tx/s |
200tx/s |
Section C28 |
WhoIs Performance Level (WhoIs) |
tx/s |
400tx/s |
Section C28 |
Admin Web Interface availability |
percentage uptime |
99.90% |
Section C28 |
Admin Web Interface Response time |
a% < b milliseconds |
97% < 4000ms |
Section C28 |
Admin Web Interface Planned Outages |
hours/month |
8hours / month |
Section C28 |
Admin Web Interface Planned Outages timeframe |
days and hours |
0600-1400 Sunday UTC |
Section C28 |
Admin Web Interface Extended Planned Outages |
hours/quarter |
18hours / quarter |
Section C28 |
Admin Web Interface Extended Planned Outages Timeframe |
days and hours |
0600-1400 Sunday UTC |
Section C28 |
Notification ALL planned outages |
days |
7days |
Section C28 |
Notification ALL Extended planned outages |
days |
21days |
Section C28 |
>
Comments
concerning the layout, construction and functionality of this site
should be sent to webmaster@icann.org.
Page updated
15-Sep-2002
©2002 The Internet Corporation for Assigned
Names and Numbers. All rights reserved. |