|
|
TLD Application: Description
of TLD Policies
15 August 2000
|
Description of TLD Policies
[INSTRUCTION:
For sponsored TLDs, this part of the application is to be completed
by the sponsoring organization. For unsponsored TLDs, the registry
operator should complete this part of the application. Please
refer to the Detailed Application Instructions for more information
on the requirements for new TLD applications.
The operation
of a TLD involves the implementation of policies on a very large
number of topics. Applicants are urged to use their response
to this part of the application to demonstrate their detailed
knowledge of what topics are involved and their careful analysis
and clear articulation of the policies they propose on these
topics.
Please place
the legend "CONFIDENTIAL" on any part of your description
that you have listed in item F3.1 of your Statement of Requested Confidential
Treatment of Materials Submitted.
Section III
of this application applies only to applicants for restricted
TLDs. Ordinarily, restricted TLDs should be sponsored.]
I. GENERAL
TLD POLICIES (Required for all
TLDs. Note that two special policy areas--policies during the
start-up period and restrictions on who may register within the
TLD and for what purpose--are covered in sections II
and III below.)
E1. In General.
Please provide a full and detailed description of all policies
to be followed in the TLD (other than those covered in response
to items E11-E21). If the
TLD's policy on a particular topic is proposed to be identical
to that reflected by a particular version of any of the following
documents, it is sufficient for your response to identify the
topic, to give a brief summary of the policy, and for the details
to reference the document and section:
Your response should comprehensively describe
policies on all topics to be followed in connection with the
proposed TLD. The following items (E2-E10)
are examples only and should not limit your description.
E2. TLD String.
Please identify the TLD string(s) you are proposing. For format
requirements for TLD strings, see the answer to FAQ
#5.
E3. Naming conventions.
Describe the naming conventions and structure within the TLD.
E.g., will registrants have names registered at the second level
(directly under the TLD, as in registered-name.com), or will
the TLD be organized with sub-domains so that registered domain
names are created at a lower level (as in registered-name.travel.com)?
E4. Registrars.
Describe in detail the policies for selection of, and competition
among, registrars. Will domain-name holders deal through registrars,
directly with the registry operator, or some combination of the
two? What are the respective roles, functions, and responsibilities
for the registry operator and registrars? If registrars are to
be employed, how and by whom will they be selected or accredited?
If the number of registrars will be restricted, what number of
registrars will be selected? Have the qualifying registrars already
been selected? On what basis will selections among those seeking
to be registrars be made, and who will make them? If registrars
are to be used, what mechanisms will be used to ensure that TLD
policies are implemented?
E5. Intellectual
Property Provisions. Describe the policies for protection
of intellectual property. Your response should address at least
the following questions, as appropriate to the TLD:
E5.1.
What measures will be taken to discourage registration of domain
names that infringe intellectual property rights?
E5.2.
If you are proposing pre-screening for potentially infringing
registrations, how will the pre-screening be performed?
E5.3.
What registration practices will be employed to minimize abusive
registrations?
E5.4.
What measures do you propose to comply with applicable trademark
and anti-cybersquatting legislation?
E5.5.
Are you proposing any special protections (other than during
the start-up period) for famous trademarks?
E5.6.
How will complete, up-to-date, reliable, and conveniently provided
Whois data be maintained, updated, and accessed concerning registrations
in the TLD?
E6. Dispute Resolution.
Describe the policies for domain name and other dispute resolution.
If you are proposing variations to the policies followed in .com,
.net, and .org, consider the following questions:
E6.1.
To what extent are you proposing to implement the Uniform
Dispute Resolution Policy?
E6.2.
Please describe any additional, alternative, or supplemental
dispute resolution procedures you are proposing.
E7. Data Privacy, Escrow,
and Whois. Describe the proposed policies on data privacy,
escrow and Whois service.
E8. Billing and Collection.
Describe variations in or additions to the policies for billing
and collection.
E9. Services and Pricing.
What registration services do you propose to establish charges
for and, for each such service, how much do you propose to charge?
E10. Other. Please
describe any policies concerning topics not covered by the above
questions.
II. REGISTRATION
POLICIES DURING THE START-UP PERIOD
(Required for all TLDs)
E11. In this section,
you should thoroughly describe all policies (including implementation
details) that you propose to follow during the start-up phase
of registrations in the TLD, to the extent they differ from the
General TLD Policies covered in items E1-E9. The following questions highlight some of
the areas that should be considered for start-up policies:
E12. How do you propose
to address the potential rush for registration at the initial
opening of the TLD? How many requested registrations do you project
will be received by the registry operator within the first day,
week, month, and quarter? What period do you believe should be
considered the TLD's "start-up period," during which
special procedures should apply?
E13. Do you propose to
place limits on the number of registrations per registrant? Per
registrar? If so, how will these limits be implemented?
E14. Will pricing mechanisms
be used to dampen a rush for registration at the initial opening
of the TLD? If so, please describe these mechanisms in detail.
E15. Will you offer any
"sunrise period" in which certain potential registrants
are offered the opportunity to register before registration is
open to the general public? If so, to whom will this opportunity
be offered (those with famous marks, registered trademarks, second-level
domains in other TLDs, pre-registrations of some sort, etc.)?
How will you implement this?
III. REGISTRATION
RESTRICTIONS (Required for restricted
TLDs only)
E16. As noted in the
New TLD Application
Process Overview, a restricted TLD is one with enforced restrictions
on (1) who may apply for a registration within the domain, (2)
what uses may be made of those registrations, or (3) both. In
this section, please describe in detail the restrictions you
propose to apply to the TLD. Your description should should define
the criteria to be employed, the manner in which you propose
they be enforced, and the consequences of violation of the restrictions.
Examples of matters that should be addressed are:
E17. Describe in detail
the criteria for registration in the TLD. Provide a full explanation
of the reasoning behind the specific policies chosen.
E18. Describe the application
process for potential registrants in the TLD.
E19. Describe the enforcement
procedures and mechanisms for ensuring registrants meet the registration
requirements.
E20. Describe any appeal
process from denial of registration.
E21. Describe any procedure
that permits third parties to seek cancellation of a TLD registration
for failure to comply with restrictions.
IV. CONTEXT
OF THE TLD WITHIN THE DNS (Required
for all TLDs)
E22. This section is
intended to allow you to describe the benefits of the TLD and
the reasons why it would benefit the global Internet community
or some segment of that community. Issues you might consider
addressing include:
E23. What will distinguish
the TLD from existing or other proposed TLDs? How will this distinction
be beneficial?
E24. What community and/or
market will be served or targeted by this TLD? To what extent
is that community or market already served by the DNS?
E25. Please describe
in detail how your proposal would enable the DNS to meet presently
unmet needs.
E26. How would the introduction
of the TLD enhance the utility of the DNS for Internet users?
For the community served by the TLD?
E27. How would the proposed
TLD enhance competition in domain-name registration services,
including competition with existing TLD registries?
V. VALUE OF
PROPOSAL AS A PROOF OF CONCEPT
(Required for all TLDs)
E28. Recent experience
in the introduction of new TLDs is limited in some respects.
The current program of establishing new TLDs is intended to allow
evaluation of possible additions and enhancements to the DNS
and possible methods of implementing them. Stated differently,
the current program is intended to serve as a "proof of
concept" for ways in which the DNS might evolve in the longer
term. This section of the application is designed to gather information
regarding what specific concept(s) could be evaluated if the
proposed TLD is introduced, how you propose the evaluation should
be done, and what information would be learned that might be
instructive in the long-term management of the DNS. Well-considered
and articulated responses to this section will be positively
viewed in the selection process. Matters you should discuss in
this section include:
E29. What concepts are
likely to be proved/disproved by evaluation of the introduction
of this TLD in the manner you propose?
E30. How do you propose
that the results of the introduction should be evaluated? By
what criteria should the success or lack of success of the TLD
be evaluated?
E31. In what way would
the results of the evaluation assist in the long-range management
of the DNS?
E32. Are there any reasons
other than evaluation of the introduction process that this particular
TLD should be included in the initial introduction?
By signing this application through its
representative, the Applicant attests that the information contained
in this Description of TLD Policies, and all referenced supporting
documents, are true and accurate to the best of Applicant's knowledge.
_______________________________
Signature
_______________________________
Name (please print)
_______________________________
Title
_______________________________
Name of Applicant Entity
_______________________________
Date
Comments concerning the layout, construction and
functionality of this site
should be sent to webmaster@icann.org.
Page Updated 15-August-00.
(c) 2000 The Internet Corporation
for Assigned Names and Numbers All rights reserved.
|