[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Comment-Dnso] Re: [IFWP] Re: Register.com and the Testbed charges effect
Roberto and all,
Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> Richard Sexton wrote:
> >firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > >I'd say this is a pretty clear determination of the effects NSI's
> > >prepayment requirement is going to have on its new and future
> > >prospective registrars.
> > Where were you 6 months ago when it seemed like I was the only one on
> > email@example.com advocating no prepayment???
> The big issue, as I see it, is not "prepayment yes" vs. "prepayment no",
> but "prepayment yes for some and no for others".
> It is self-evident (please correct me if I'm wrong) that this situation is
> not a level field for competition.
Completely agreed Roberto. And as such the Test bed registrars
under the arcane and non-competition based "Accreditation Policy"
demonstrates this very clearly.... And it does so in many other
ways other than just the questionably portion of that "Accreditation
Policy" of pre-payment. Time will also show this as well.
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208