[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Comment-Dnso] simple questions
>Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 01:01:30 -0400
>To: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
>From: Gene Marsh <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>I have tried on several occasions to re-establish some form of
communication with you and ICANN. You have committed to me your response
on several issues, but have ignored my requests and your commitments.
>I ask again publicly for you to address, directly, the following questions:
>- Why have you not responded to the formal request to you and the ICANN
board to re-evaluate the TLDA position as a gTLD DNSO Constituency? You
committed to me an answer on this topic in the first week of June.
>- Why have you ignored requests from Diebold Incorporated and other
corporations for clarification on the constituency position for corporations?
>- Why have you not followed the ICANN Bylaws regarding DNSO constituency?
>- Why has there been no recognition of existing new TLD registry interests
>These are straight-forward questions. I expect them to be answered, as
you have committed to do.
Senior Network Marketing Manager
"Building Global Services Capabilities"