[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Court Ruling Could Prohibit Stealth Sites (internet.com) (fwd)
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Court Ruling Could Prohibit Stealth Sites (internet.com) (fwd)
- From: Michael Dillon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 17:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
- Organization: Memra Communications Inc.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 14:50:53 -0400
From: Dennis <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Court Ruling Could Prohibit Stealth Sites (internet.com)
At 10:48 PM 4/22/99 -1000, you wrote:
>On Thu, 22 Apr 1999, Christian Nielsen wrote:
>> Network Solutions declines to register the domain name for which you have
>> Network Solutions has a right founded in the First Amendment to the
>> U.S. Constitution to refuse to register, and thereby publish, on the
>> Internet registry of domain names words that it deems to be inappropriate.
>> In one sense, they say it is only string and numbers then go on to say that
>> they refuse to register a name cause they 'deem it to be inappropriate'.
>Hold on a moment... NetSol was granted the contract to run the InterNIC
>database by the US government... So if I want to register
>FUCKOFFANDDIE.com, shouldn't it be allowed? NetSol must follow the
>rules/regulations of the US gov't. and the First Amendment Rights, that
Netsol is out of control. Plain and simple.
Send 'unsubscribe' in the body to 'firstname.lastname@example.org' to leave.
Eat sushi frequently. email@example.com is the human contact address.