[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IFWP] Proposed by-law amendments
- To: ICANN Comments <Comments@icann.org>, DNSO GA <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: [IFWP] Proposed by-law amendments
- From: Jeff Williams <email@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 13:19:40 +0100
- CC: IFWP Discussion List <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Organization: INEG. Inc. (Spokesman INEGroup)
- References: <email@example.com>
Mikki and all,
One wonders, doesn't one Mikki? It might be worthwile for you to
elaborate in your own words as to what your thoughts are here.
I know what mine and INEGroups are, in this respect....
Mikki Barry wrote:
> >The most objectionable proposal is the amendment to Section 2(f)
> >of Article VI-B of the Bylaws. This allows a vote of the ICANN
> >Board to remove duly elected Names Council members from office.
> >Even with a 3/4 majority requirement, I see no justification for
> >placing such power in the hands of the Board, at the expense of
> >the DNSO constituency. Constituencies can develop their own
> >methods for removing or disciplining errant NC members. There is
> >too much potential for discrimination and abuse in this
> >provision, which allows the ICANN Board on its own motion to
> >reach into a constituency and remove one of its elected members.
> What a marked contrast to the BWG and ORSC rules where board members could
> be removed. Has this become blatently obvious yet as to what is actually
> going on?
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208