Links | 链接

Local Time | 本地时间

ChinaTue, 26 Jan 2016, 09:24

感谢赞助商

gold
Verisign

Afilias

Public Interest Registry

HiChina

silver
Symantec
APNIC
NCC Group
apTLD
Freedom Registry
bronze

Uniregistry

AFNIC


 

政策与实施

日期: 
2013 年 4 月 10 日 - 09:00 - 10:30
会议室: 
大厅 A

会议主持人: Marika Konings | Sr Director, Policy Development Support

将提供文字记录
Remote Participation - Low Bandwidth
Remote Participation - High Bandwidth
概述

说明:在新 gTLD 计划的实施相关问题引发的讨论之影响下,大家更加关注哪些主题要求制定政策、哪些主题要求开展实施工作,其中包括应该使用哪些流程、何时以及如何处理意见分歧。为了促进这些讨论,ICANN 工作人员为机构群体讨论编制了一份框架草案,其中确定了可能促进未来处理相似问题的大量步骤和标准。该文确定了机构群体可能希望在此背景下进一步考虑的诸多问题,以及可在短期考虑的多条改进建议。针对何为政策或哪些实施也许不可行来制定明确的规则时,希望的是通过确立清晰流程并为不同的利益主体确认明确的职责和责任,使未来处理这些问题更容易,且更容易实现广泛的参与和介入。为了促进机构群体对该主题的讨论,组织本次会议在于获取机构群体意见并确认可行的后续步骤。

详细会议议程:

Moderator:

  • Bruce Tonkin - ICANN Board, Vice Chair

Panel Members:

  • Don Blumenthal – Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC)
  • Evan Leibovitch – At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC)
  • Chuck Gomes – GNSO Registry Stakeholder Group (RySG)
  • Avri Doria – GNSO Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG)
  • Steve DelBianco - GNSO Business Constituency (BC)
  • Brian Winterfeldt - GNSO Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC)
  • James Bladel - GNSO Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG)
  • Aparna Sridhar - Google

Agenda

  • Welcome – David Olive, ICANN, VP Policy Development Support (2 minutes)
  • Introduction of the panel, outline of the session – Bruce Tonkin, ICANN Board, Vice-Chair (3 minutes)
  • Short presentation of staff paper and comments received in response to public comment forum – Marika Konings, ICANN, Sr. Policy Director (5 minutes)
  • Question 1 - What is from the perspective of your community the main priority with regard to the discussion on policy vs. implementation
Response Panel (10 minutes)
Comments / questions from the floor (8 minutes)
  • Question 2 - Do you believe that an overall framework could be created for all policy implementation activities within ICANN or should specific models be created that would apply for ASO/ccNSO/GNSO policy implementation activities?
Response Panel (10 minutes)
Comments / questions from the floor (8 minutes)
  • Question 3 - One of the questions that was raised in the staff discussion paper is how to deal with instances where no consensus can be reached on key issues or competing ‘policy advice’ is received from different SO/ACs? From your perspective, should additional mechanisms be developed that would ‘force’ cross-community engagement and decision-making (see for example EU conciliation procedure http://www.se2009.eu/en/meetings_news/2009/11/4/how_does_the_conciliation_procedure_work.html) or should alternative approaches be explored?
Response Panel (10 minutes)
Comments / questions from the floor (8 minutes)
  • Question 4 - What should be the next step in addressing this issue? Some have suggested the creation of a cross-community WG. What is your view on this approach? Are there certain elements that would need a cross-community approach while others should be addressed within respective SO/ACs?
Response Panel (10 minutes)
Comments / questions from the floor (8 minutes)
Conclusion & Next steps – Bruce Tonkin (8 minutes)

Background material:

For further details, including bios, please see https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Policy+vs+Implementation.