DNS Root Server System Advisory Committee, SUNTEC Convention Center, Singapore
Fecha: 
2 Marzo, 1999
Agenda
- Introduction
- Background/Charter
- Members
- Issues/Tasks
- Future schedule
- Open meeting planning
Initial reasons for RSSAC
- Root Server System issues have been addressed
 - in the Green Paper and White Paper process
- in the formation of ICANN.
 
 
 
 
- Root Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC) mandated
 - in ICANN JPA-MoU with the US Government
 
 in ICANN bylaws
 
 
 
- Jon Postel left.
Additional background
- Changes in the root server system have been discussed inside and
 outside of the US government for over two years. As part of the Green
 Paper and White Paper process, it was agreed that the entire system
 would be reviewed as part of the formation of ICANN to assess its
 current state and possible areas where improvement might be needed.
 
- Consequently, a specific provision for a Root Server System Advisory
 Committee (RSSAC) was included in the bylaws from the beginning.
 
- The passing of Jon Postel left some policy issues and some
 day-to-day operational concerns without clear direction. It is
 important to note that he set up a reliable system that has continued
 to function without him, but these issues need to be addressed in a
 way that protects both the short term and long term operational
 stability of the Net.
 
Meeting Summary of RSSAC
- March 2, 1999 10:00-15:00
- 15 participants
- Root server operators group
- IETF/IAB
- IEPG
- RIRs
- IANA staff
- ICANN CEO
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Work Items
- To write technical procedures for operation of the primary root server
 including procedures that permit modifications, additions or deletions
 to the root zone file.
 
- To make the management of the root server system more robust and
 secure:
 - Operational requirements of root name servers, including host hardware
 capacities, operating system and name server software versions, network
 connectivity, and physical environment.
- Examination of the security aspects of the root name server  system
 and review of the number, location, and distribution of root name
 servers considering the total system performance, robustness, and
 reliability.
- Development of operational procedures for the root server  system,
 including formalization of contractual relationships under which root
 servers throughout the world are operated.
 
 
 
 
 
 
- Operational requirements of root name servers, including host hardware
- To design, develop, and test a plan for addressing the operational
 issues raised by possible expansion of the
 number of gTLDs. The designed process should consider and take into
 account the following:
 - New gTLDs
- IPv6 deployment
- Security issues
 
 
 
 
 
Other Issues discussed
- Future Relationship with other groups
 - IETF related WG for large scale DNS operations (large/many
 zones)
- RFC2010 revision
- ICANN SOs - ASO/DNSO policy and operations decisions will need
 coordination with root nameserver operation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- IETF related WG for large scale DNS operations (large/many
- Y2K problems
- do the root servers have a Y2K problem? It does not seem so
 but further investigation is required.
 
- What formal statement/report/certification will need to be
 made on this?
 
 
 
 
 
 
- do the root servers have a Y2K problem? It does not seem so
- Risk Management
Membership
- The ICANN Board is responsible for appointing the initial chairman of
 the RSSAC, which it did at its meeting of 1/17/99 by appointing Jun
 Murai.
 
- It is anticipated that the chairman will nominate an initial slate of
 members for the RSSAC.
- It is not required that the committee have a specific number of
 members, nor that the full complement of members be appointed
 immediately.
 
- It has been the group consensus so far that it needs to include:
 Root nameserver operators, DNS, and Topology area technical experts.
 
Schedules
 The second meeting of RSSAC
 IETF/Minneapolis (March 15-19), Tuesday, March 16.
- Expected initial output draft after the second meeting
 - preliminary list of milestones tbd in Minneapolis
- initial draft(s) for internal review around March 31,
 1999(?)
- Mailing list for committee's work to be established
 
 
 
 
 
 
Open part of this meeting
- Introduction/background
- Work Items
- Members
- Hearing requirements
- Discussions
- Announcement of the 2nd meeting
The Chair made sure interested observers at the open portion of the meeting
had the background and mission of the committee explained. Some
questions were taken from a couple of observers.
Adjourned approx. 15:00.





























