Re: [IFWP] Discussion of Constituency Formation

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

RIchard and all,

  If you remember, there was some discussion and heated debate
with respect to Registrie(S) with respect to a constituency...
Of course I have yet to see a definition in terms of the DNSO,
what a legitimate "Constituency" is...  So my comment is yet
again, LET THE GAMES CONTINUE, and/or THE DIVISIVENESS
CONTINUES....

Richard J. Sexton wrote:

> At 01:04 PM 4/10/99 -0400, Bret A. Fausett wrote:
> >Following the recent posts on the ICANN web site:
> >
> >   http://www.icann.org/dnso/constituency_groups.html
>
> Is says there:
>
> >The DNSO Formation Concepts statement adopted by the ICANN Board of Directors on March 4, and the draft
> >bylaw changes designed to implement that statement, call for the formation of a number of self-organized
> >Constituency Groups within the DNSO.  In particular, these documents specify that the DNSO will include the
> >following initial Constituency Groups:
> >
> >     ccTLD registries
> >     Commercial and business entities
> >     gTLD registries
>
> gTLD registrieS ? There's only one... or does this mean "prospective
> registreis" ?
>
> --
> richard@dns.list    sexton@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> "Those who give up a little freedom for a little security
> will not have, nor do they deserve, either one"
>                --Thomas Jefferson

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208