Re: [Membership] Structure of 'at large' membership

[BRPWIT@aol.com]

Russ:
Till I got to the below response from you, i thought there was some common
ground. In your response you more than recognize the naming and content
problem. 

My aim is to ge these things put up front then figure out how to get a
structure to handle it.  

In response to:

n a message dated 99-02-06 04:00:14 EST, you write:

<< Rather than someone standing on your foot it sounds more like you
 sit there and think up things that might bother you and then go out and try
 to find them and censor it (church lady syndrome). >>

Two answers to this  comment(?):

1- I want to attack the problem Before it occurs rather than wait till after -
if you had read what i wrote and not what you wanted to read - you would see i
am trying to be pro-active rather than reactivce.

2- church like - just because i didn't say what action i would take when you
step on my foot  - 

 My taking a position that things shouild be identified first in order to
develop a structure to handle it is proactive not being a waiter as you
propose.

The structure needs to deal with the FREEDOM of Speech Issue. or are you
saying let everyone do what they want to the detriment of what they want?
steve