[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Membership] Remote Participation in the Singapore Open Meeting

To: "Michael Gendron" <mgendron@gcstech.com>, "'Bob Allisat'" <bob@fcn.net>
Subject: Re: [Membership] Remote Participation in the Singapore Open Meeting
From: "Dr Nii Quaynor" <quaynor@ghana.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 17:59:29 -0000
Cc: <clare.wardle@postoffice.co.uk>, "Ben Edelman" <edelman-list@cyber.law.harvard.edu>, <membership@icann.org>
Sender: owner-membership@zephyr.isi.edu



>Again, my original question - what was the decision criteria for having a
meeting in Singapore? Why not Toronto or LA or Mexico City or the Caribbean?
Why Singapore - that is my question?  Like I said, I appreciate the real
video connection, but why Singapore?
>


Why *not* Timbuctou, Cairo, Johannesburg, Bamako, Kampala, Accra, Nairobi,
Luanda, Cotonou, Manzini ............ I wish I could toss a biased coin ;-)
Its good for Asia this time around and lets hope for Jamaica in future.

Nii

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Membership] Remote Participation in the Singapore Open Meeting
  - From: Bob Allisat <bob@fcn.net>

Prev by Date: RE: [Membership] Remote Participation in the Singapore Open Meeting
Next by Date: [Membership] Why Singapore?
Prev by thread: Re: [Membership] Why Singapore?
Next by thread: Re: [Membership] Remote Participation in the Singapore Open Meeting
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread