[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Comment-Dnso] Re: [IFWP] Re: [dnso.discuss] Modifications to ICIIU Guidelines a nd NCDNHC definition

On Tue, 01 Jun 1999 02:14:15 +0100, Jeff Williams
<jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>  I don't agree with you here Kent.  WIlliam was simply pointing out and
>in this
>one case correctly so, that the ISOC more often than not, speaks out of
>both sides of its proverbial mouth, so to speak.  In other words, if the
>chooses to lead the effort for the NCDNHC, as Mr Sondow has informed us,
>and it certainly seems as though it is attempting to do, it is doing so
>inappropriately.  And any insistence of Don Heath made at the Berlin
>meeting, in this respect was both irrational and ineffectual.

It should be noted that it is just as inappropriate for Mr Sondow to
be trying to lead the constituency.  Almost all of his "Adherents" who
support his effort (so he says, I read that page as only meaning they
have an interest in being a member of a non commercial constituency)
are commercial interests that his own rules would have excluded.

Neither of these two belong at the helm.

Time for some fresh blood.

William X. Walsh william@dso.net
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
Fax:(209) 671-7934

The Law is not your mommy or daddy to go 
crying to every time you have something 
to whimper about.