[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ICANN) STATEMENT ON HACKING OF NETWORK SOLUTIONS' SERVERS (fwd)
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: (ICANN) STATEMENT ON HACKING OF NETWORK SOLUTIONS' SERVERS (fwd)
- From: Michael Dillon <email@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 18:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
- Organization: Memra Communications Inc.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 1999 23:12:46 -0500 (CDT)
From: Joe Shaw <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Dean Robb <email@example.com>
Cc: Randy Bush <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
David Alejandro Hernandez Alonso <email@example.com>,
Subject: Re: (ICANN) STATEMENT ON HACKING OF NETWORK SOLUTIONS' SERVERS
I personally trust ICANN and NSI as far as I can throw their collective
asses. NSI has shown repeatedly that they don't give a rat's behind one
way or the other about DNS registration system, as long as they continue
to hold power over it. ICANN are far too shady and back-room meeting
oriented to really have anyone's best interest but their own at heart.
So, who's the lesser of the two evils? Both make me shudder.
Joseph W. Shaw - firstname.lastname@example.org
Freelance Computer Security Consultant and Perl Programmer
Free UNIX advocate - "I hack, therefore I am."
On Sat, 3 Jul 1999, Dean Robb wrote:
> As part, no doubt, of the current ICANN/NSI war, NSI says that the hack
> attack come from the ISP colocated with ICANN...
> "Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of ICANN?"
> Dean Robb
> Owner, PC-EASY
> (757) 495-EASY 
> On-site computer repairs, upgrades and consultations
> Lead SimOps columnist/reviewer on http://WWW.TheGamers.Net