[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ICANN (Initial?) Interim Board Still refuses to answer stakeholder questions was:[IFWP] Re: Call for comments on DNSO Names Council amendments (Deadline: August 10)]
Congressmen and all,
Patrick Greenwell has brought forth yet again the unwillingness of
the ICANN (Initial?) Interim Boards to answer on an open public
E-Mail list forum questions that have been ask repeatedly. In addition
in the hearing that you congressmen of the Commerce committee ask
and prior to requested, Esther Dyson and Joe Sims willingly answered
of the more specific questions in a less than honest manner.
If transition is to be successful, these questions must be answered
honestly in public. (See attached reference below)
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
---- Begin included message ----
---- End included message ----
On Sat, 7 Aug 1999, Esther Dyson wrote:
> Thanks, Karl.
> We are indeed soliciting comments as you suggest at the end.
What is truly unfortunate is that despite repeated requests you have not
addressed the substance of Karl's statements.
ICANN willingly and knowingly violated its' own bylaws with the
ICANN Interim CEO and counsel present in taking actions to have certain
individuals forcibly ejected from a teleconference. Why?
Is this an issue that will ever be answered when it is asked by the
plebs, or will we be forced to have any meaningful question
asked by a Congressperson in order to receive an answer?
"This is our time. It will not come again."