[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Newly Updated NCDNHC Membership List
- To: DNSO GA <firstname.lastname@example.org>, ICANN Comments <Comments@icann.org>
- Subject: Re: Newly Updated NCDNHC Membership List
- From: Jeff Williams <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:08:32 +0100
- CC: Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders Constituency Discussion List <firstname.lastname@example.org>, commerce <email@example.com>
- Organization: INEG. Inc. (Spokesman INEGroup)
- References: <Your message of "Mon, 16 Aug 1999 12:52:37 PDT." <m11GSo9-00000LC@roam.psg.com> <LYR1799-5510-1999.08.16-17.20.03--Jwkckid1firstname.lastname@example.org>
Don and all,
Why should Mark's orgnization do so comply to your request if none
of the other "Applicants" have or have been ask to do so? In addition Don,
what are the criterion for doing so? Will all the other NCDNHC applicants
be required to do the same? If not, why not? Where is it specified in the
DNSO or the ICANN bylaws that this is a requirnment for constituency
applicants? Where in the NCDNHC Charter is it stated that any applicant
comply with the sort of request that you are making?
Basicaly Don, it appears that you Randy, and Kent Crispin are trying
to purposfully discredit Mark by starting a witch hunt here....
Don Heath wrote:
> At 01:23 PM 8/16/99 -0700, email@example.com wrote:
> >On 16 August 1999, Randy Bush <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >>please do something to convince us that this is a real organization.
> >Sure thing, Randy. What would you like me to do? Keep in mind that
> >any standard you set here had better be applicable to any group that
> >is qualified to be a member of this Constituency.
> >Please prove that your organization is real. I'll bet I can denouce
> >any "proof" you come up with as well.
> Orgs like ACM really don't . . . oh well, you know what I am going to
> >Let's face it Randy. You just don't like me, and you've found a
> >convenient target for a witch-hunt. Please either point to one or
> >more sections of the by-laws that have something to do with proof of
> >legitimacy that this organization has not met, or let the issue drop.
> >Otherwise, you may start to tread on the toes of the other member
> >organizations. Keep in mind that a standard for one must be a
> >standard for all.
> >If you want to persist in this, I'll simply withdraw the application.
> >However, I'll do so pointing out to all who will listen that the
> >by-laws do not match the actual membership qualifications.
> Rather than spend your energy on this sort of rhetoric, why not simply
> show the reality of your org?
> You are currently subscribed to ncdnhc-discuss as: Jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ncdnhc-discuss-1799I@lyris.isoc.org
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208