.
.
|
CARTER CENTER REPRESENTATIVES OBSERVE ICANN BALLOTING
For Immediate Release
CONTACT: Deanna Congileo, 404-420-5108; or Yawei Liu, 404-932-2199 (cell)
ATLANTA, GA, Wednesday, Oct. 11, 2000 Carter Center representatives who observed the Oct. 1-10
global online election for five regionally elected seats on the ICANN
Board of Directors said that despite serious technical problems in
initially registering eligible voters from a potential electorate of
millions of Internet users, ICANN conducted reasonably free, open, and
competitive elections.
ICANN, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, is a
nonprofit corporation overseeing the technical management of the Internet
previously carried out under the U.S. government through contractors.
ICANN "keeps the Internet running" and assigns high-level domain names,
and through registrars, e-mail addresses.
"There were challenges to an electoral process occurring almost entirely
in cyberspace. Nonetheless, this experiment with direct elections via the
Internet was unprecedented and has huge implications for the future
development of a global public discourse and further potential uses of the
Internet in public elections," said Charles Costello, director of the
Carter Center Democracy Program, which observed the electoral process.
"Subject to further review of the available balloting data, the vote
tabulations appear to reflect accurately the expressed choices of the
ICANN electorate in each region and properly identify the five winning
candidates." A preferential voting system, with votes being cast for all
candidates in a region by order of preference, first-choice,
second-choice, etc., was used.
Of some 76,000 eligible voters, 34,035 voted. The size of the electorate
was impossible to predict in advance, but ICANN established a minimum
voter roll of 5,000 to validate the election and estimated a maximum of
10,000-20,000 votes. Some 158,000 people registered to vote online. Higher
than expected number of registrants, especially late in the registration
period, led to problems of access to the ICANN server. An undetermined
number, quite possibly in the thousands, were unable to register. Of the
158,000, some 76,000 activated their membership and voting rights as
required after receiving personal identification numbers (PIN) by regular
mail delivery. In this stage as well, serious problems were encountered
with receipt by mail of PINs, especially in countries where mail service
is slow or unreliable. Initial registration far exceeded expectations, but
final voter turnout was much closer to ICANN's planning estimates.
Technical difficulties on the morning of the first day of balloting also
occurred but were corrected promptly, Costello said. In the last hour of
balloting on Oct. 10, access to the server for voting was unavailable for
approximately 30 minutes. Poll closing time was extended by some 40
minutes to make up for that time of unavailability. Vote tabulation was
executed without technical difficulties within a short time after the
closing of the polls, he added.
"Based on a limited monitoring of registration in cyberspace, member
nomination of candidates, campaigning, and voting, all online, there were
no identifiable patterns or deliberate actions evidencing attempts to
disfranchise voters or manipulate voting and vote tabulation," Costello
said.
In three regions (Asia/Pacific, Latin America and Africa) candidates
nominated by the ICANN Nominating Committee won the election. In two
regions (North America and Europe), the winners were member-nominated
candidates. In four of five regions, the winning candidates received a
majority of votes cast in the first tabulation. In the North America
region, the winner was determined on the fifth round of redistribution of
voting preferences. In the Asia/Pacific region, the winning candidate
received an unusually large majority.
Carter Center representatives noted a few issues that should be studied
and addressed. These include the need to reduce the digital gap between
the developed world and the developing world; voter privacy and security
issues; and campaigning in cyberspace.
"The concern with voter privacy and data security somewhat complicated
voters' access to actual polling and candidates' access to the voters,"
said Yawei Liu, program associate of the Carter Center Democracy Program.
"Meanwhile, campaigning in cyberspace is an urgent issue that warrants
greater attention. This election demonstrated that voter outreach and
media coverage in certain countries were clearly more extensive and
organized than they were in others, and this, therefore, had an impact on
electoral outcomes for regional representatives."
EDITORS NOTE: For more information on the final vote counts in each region
and the preferential vote tabulation system, visit the "At-Large
Membership" section of the ICANN website: www.icann.org.
Back
To The Top
© 2000 ICANN. All rights reserved.
|