registerfly

Registrar review

This forum has been set up specifically to attract comments from the wider Internet on what they believe is the best way forward for dealing with the problems exposed by registrar RegisterFly.

It is a forum, so we welcome debate on the issue, however ICANN retains the right to delete posts that stray off-topic, make libellous claims or accusations or which become abusive.

The hope is that this forum will help ideas coalesce into firm suggested policy changes.

RegisterFly chatroom discussion

The following discussion over RegisterFly occurred in the chatroom on ICANN's public participation website during the public forum on Monday 26 March.

Note: This is an excerpt of the full chatroom archive covering just the discussion over RegisterFly in the morning of Monday 26 March 2007. The full chatroom archive covering all days of the conference and all those events that took place in the main room (Floriana 1+2) can be found here.

Board discussion over RegisterFly

The following is the discussion held over RegisterFly at the ICANN Board meeting on Friday 31 March 2007.

RegisterFly was also the topic of discussion for an hour at the end of the Public Forum on Monday 26 March 2007. The public forum's full transcript is available here.

Note: Although transcript output is largely accurate, in some cases it is incomplete or inaccurate due to inaudible passages or transcription errors. It is posted as an aid to understanding the proceedings at the session, but should not be treated as an authoritative record.


NB: This is an edited excerpt of the full meeting transcript, broken down according to each Board member and produced in an effort to provide easy access to the substantive discussion. For the Board meeting's full transcript click here.

Public forum discussion over RegisterFly

The following is the discussion held over RegisterFly at the ICANN public forum on Monday 26 March 2007. The transcript for the entire public forum can be found here.

RegisterFly was also the topic of discussion at a Board meeting on Friday 31 March. A hyperlinked version of that discussion is available here.

Note: Although transcript output is largely accurate, in some cases it is incomplete or inaccurate due to inaudible passages or transcription errors. It is posted as an aid to understanding the proceedings at the session, but should not be treated as an authoritative record.


NB: This is an edited excerpt of the full meeting transcript, broken down according to each Board member and produced in an effort to provide easy access to the substantive discussion.

Comment on Registrar Accreditation Agreement Process To be Reformed - Registrants Input Needed.

The recent decision to change how things are is fine. The registrars imput is needed but also I would go further and ask that public would as well. We must prevent the chaos after register fly incident. There is no mention on the front page. It is like business as usual. The people who lost a domain because of Register fly not applying the renewal fees should have redress. There should be an easier mediation process in extreme cases like what happened at registerfly. There should be shared liability between domain reseller and the orgiginal registry.

Looking for info on RegisterFly?

ICANN will hold a special session on Monday 26 March at 12pm GMT to cover the issues raised by RegisterFly. Click here for more information.

Syndicate content