[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Domain registrars requirements for 'accuracy'. (fwd)
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Domain registrars requirements for 'accuracy'. (fwd)
- From: Michael Dillon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 10:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
- Organization: Memra Communications Inc.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 01:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rahul Dhesi <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Domain registrars requirements for 'accuracy'.
Patrick Greenwell <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> You might want to cite the fact that AOLSearch.com lost their
>> domain for having inacurate data.. hence, they set a precedence.
>The fact that aolsearch.com lost their domain name was due to their
>unreachability because of inaccurate data, not simply because the data
>itself was inaccurate.
My understanding is that aolsearch.com was transferred to AOL because of
two factors that acted together: (a) Network Solutions is out of
control and (b) AOL is big and has clout and it wanted aolsearch.com.
All the descriptions I have read point to these factors.
Given that www.aolsearch.com was an active web site, inabilty to reach
the domain owner had to be an excuse, not a reason. It's not that hard
to find a live human being, starting from a valid web site URL.
Rahul Dhesi <email@example.com>
See my UUNET spam mini-faq at:
Send 'unsubscribe' in the body to 'firstname.lastname@example.org' to leave.
Eat sushi frequently. email@example.com is the human contact address.