[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IFWP] ANNOUNCE: ICANN-Santiago Remote Participation
- To: ICANN Comments <Comments@icann.org>
- Subject: Re: [IFWP] ANNOUNCE: ICANN-Santiago Remote Participation
- From: Jeff Williams <email@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 15:01:33 +0100
- Organization: INEG. Inc. (Spokesman INEGroup)
- References: <Pine.LNX.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Ellen and all,
We [INEGroup] completely agree with Ellen's conclusion here
and have stated similar concerns to ICANN before on this
practice in remote participation.
Ellen Rony wrote:
> Ben Edelman wrote:
> >We do think it will be helpful to group similar comments together. Should
> >you and David Post happen to submit comments that seem (to us!)
> >substantially the same or overlapping in part, it seems a good use of the
> >meeting's time for your agreement, along with any notable differences, to be
> >reported. ("Michael Froomkin and David Post both submitted comments noting
> >that... while Froomkin also went on to note ...")
> I think it's a grave mistake to do this. A summary loses the flavor of the
> comment and may infuse bias. Imagine if all those who attended the
> Santiago meeting were told, "We don't have time to hear your comments.
> Just tell us your concern and we will summarize it in a sentence or two
> for the ICANN board and group it together with those of similar mind."
> The remote contributions should be as valid as the physical participation,
> since many of the interested parties have neither deep pockets nor
> scheduling freedom to follow ICANN around the world. After hearing several
> public onsite comments, the board should then refer to several online
> comments, back and forth, through the open forum. Or some neutral party
> should be assigned to read a few online comments interspersed with the ones
> presented onsite.
> But establishing someone in Santiago as a filter to distill the online
> comments, to decide what is or is not important in a submission, is just
> plain wrong.
> Ellen Rony The Domain Name Handbook
> Co-author ____ http://www.domainhandbook.com
> ========================== ^..^ )6 =============================
> ISBN 0879305150 (oo) -^-- +1 (415) 435-5010
> firstname.lastname@example.org W W Tiburon, CA
> DOT COM is the Pig Latin of the Information Age
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208