Barbara Simons
- posted on 2000-10-05 15:22:07
|
I have been concerned about privacy issues for many years, and I am a member of the Board of the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC). Of course ICANN must comply with federal privacy laws. But there is also a privacy issue with the whois database. If I am elected to the Board, I shall attempt to get the whois database modified in the following ways:
1. require authentication prior to giving access to the database;
2. log acesses (after authentication);
3. notify the person whose record has been accessed.
|
Harris Miller
- posted on 2000-09-29 12:07:42
|
As a private non-profit corporation, ICANN is already subject to state and federal laws, including disclosure. As a Board member of several for profit and non profit organizations, I know the importance of ensuring corporate compliance with relevant laws. ICANN should be and is no different.
|
Lyman Chapin
- posted on 2000-09-29 11:33:30
|
I agree that ICANN's directors should understand privacy issues well beyond a position of non-involvement, but ICANN has no authority to decide whether or not it will comply with the law.
|
Emerson Tiller, J.D., Ph.D.
- posted on 2000-09-25 00:25:05
|
As long as ICANN is a U.S. nonprofit corporation, it will be subject to state and federal laws regarding privacy. As director, I would insist that ICANN comply with federal disclosure requirements.
|
Lawrence Lessig
- posted on 2000-09-24 13:19:35
|
ICANN has no choice but to comply with
federal law, including federal privacy law.
My point has been that ICANN is not itself
to become a privacy regulator -- or any
regulator at all.
|